Author Topic: Gold Shield  (Read 34179 times)

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #125 on: August 24, 2008, 04:02:16 AM »
0
nice. i've been waiting for this ruling for awhile.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Hedgehogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • In America!!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #126 on: August 24, 2008, 02:42:10 PM »
0
That is awesome, and I agree completely. Thanks Bryon. :)
I'll prove I'm not a loser, by challenging you to a children's card game!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #127 on: August 24, 2008, 04:12:39 PM »
0
+1 and support.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #128 on: August 25, 2008, 12:00:42 AM »
0
What we're talking about here is a new precedent since Golden Shield is the first card to convert a Hero but allow it to keep it's Hero status.  In the past convert cards removed the character from battle which caused initiative to be passed.  Since Golden Shield doesn't cause the character to leave battle and the SA does not (directly) cause them to lose, I would rule that the Hero does not get initiative to play an interrupt/negate in their prior brigade, only in the new brigade that is chosen by Golden Shield.
This is correct.  I'm playing catch-up on 4 pages of ruling questions, so I'm going to pass on reading beyond the first page on this thread. 

The rules give a player a chance to play a negate based on "prior state" in only one case: Losing By Removal.  Gold Shield does not remove the hero from the battle, so the hero does not get the chance to use a negate based on prior state.  The player may only play a negate of the new brigade color.

Just so I'm straight on this: if my King David in battle is replaced with red David with a CTR card, is King David considered removed?

You see, to me this is the same situation as a hero that changes brigade with Gold Shield.  Same hero, different brigades.  The only difference between the two situations is that in one the hero is on two separate physical cards.  And that's a distinction that can become confusing to some.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #129 on: August 25, 2008, 12:03:55 AM »
0
I'm happy with the new ruling, but I wonder how long it will take before MN decides to accept this ruling as well.
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #130 on: August 25, 2008, 12:27:44 AM »
0
if my King David in battle is replaced with red David with a CTR card, is King David considered removed?
yes

Offline DaClock

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3196
  • TKP Lives?
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #131 on: August 25, 2008, 12:53:36 AM »
0
What we're talking about here is a new precedent since Golden Shield is the first card to convert a Hero but allow it to keep it's Hero status.  In the past convert cards removed the character from battle which caused initiative to be passed.  Since Golden Shield doesn't cause the character to leave battle and the SA does not (directly) cause them to lose, I would rule that the Hero does not get initiative to play an interrupt/negate in their prior brigade, only in the new brigade that is chosen by Golden Shield.
This is correct.  I'm playing catch-up on 4 pages of ruling questions, so I'm going to pass on reading beyond the first page on this thread. 

The rules give a player a chance to play a negate based on "prior state" in only one case: Losing By Removal.  Gold Shield does not remove the hero from the battle, so the hero does not get the chance to use a negate based on prior state.  The player may only play a negate of the new brigade color.

Just so I'm straight on this: if my King David in battle is replaced with red David with a CTR card, is King David considered removed?

You see, to me this is the same situation as a hero that changes brigade with Gold Shield.  Same hero, different brigades.  The only difference between the two situations is that in one the hero is on two separate physical cards.  And that's a distinction that can become confusing to some.

Obviously this is illegal, you cannot control 2 of the same unique character.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #132 on: August 25, 2008, 08:43:01 AM »
0
I'm happy with the new ruling, but I wonder how long it will take before MN decides to accept this ruling as well.

Are you kidding?  We were already playing it that way.

Essentially non-negatable evil battle winner, for...uh...for the win, I guess.

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #133 on: August 25, 2008, 10:06:52 AM »
0
I'm happy with the new ruling, but I wonder how long it will take before MN decides to accept this ruling as well.


Don't blame MN for the mistakes of one Hobbit.

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #134 on: August 26, 2008, 04:39:38 PM »
0
I basically agree with the logic and ruling posted by Byron (and people on that side of the argument).

I do have a question though:

If I make a rescue with a green Miriam and they block with Rezin and Gold shield and use it to convert Miriam to white,   What happens when I play Words of Encouragement?  Since that would interrupt Gold Shield, is my Miriam temporarily green again and I have to play a green enhancement with the play next ability?

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #135 on: August 26, 2008, 04:54:11 PM »
0
I basically agree with the logic and ruling posted by Byron (and people on that side of the argument).

I do have a question though:

If I make a rescue with a green Miriam and they block with Rezin and Gold shield and use it to convert Miriam to white,   What happens when I play Words of Encouragement?  Since that would interrupt Gold Shield, is my Miriam temporarily green again and I have to play a green enhancement with the play next ability?

Yes, which means then that Words couldn't be played, which then means Miriam is back to white so she can play Words, etc. etc. etc.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #136 on: August 26, 2008, 04:57:15 PM »
0
Not so, the playing of cards cannot be negated.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #137 on: August 26, 2008, 06:29:47 PM »
0
words only interrupts the battle. gold shield discards itself when used, so it is no longer in battle.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Kor

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 756
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #138 on: August 26, 2008, 06:49:52 PM »
0
words only interrupts the battle. gold shield discards itself when used, so it is no longer in battle.

Actually...

http://www.redemptionreg.com/REG/howtouse14.htm

‘Interrupt the battle’ interrupts all active ongoing abilities on characters and enhancements (e.g. Red Dragon), abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal (e.g. King Zimri), as well as the last enhancement played in the current battle if it was played by your opponent.  Interrupting the battle interrupts the battle flow at the point where you played the interrupt.  It does not send you back to the beginning of the battle and does not include special abilities completed prior to the interrupt being played that are no longer pending.

So if you had initiative and an interrupt the battle card of the right brigade, you would be able to use it to stop golden shield.
Life is what you make of it.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #139 on: August 26, 2008, 07:08:12 PM »
0
Not so, the playing of cards cannot be negated.

I was being facetious.  This circular reference error also occurs with the scenario when you ITB a CTR.  I have no idea what was ruled.  Guess I'll go glean the REG and see if it was addressed.
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #140 on: August 26, 2008, 07:29:18 PM »
0
words only interrupts the battle. gold shield discards itself when used, so it is no longer in battle.

Actually...

http://www.redemptionreg.com/REG/howtouse14.htm

‘Interrupt the battle’ interrupts all active ongoing abilities on characters and enhancements (e.g. Red Dragon), abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal (e.g. King Zimri), as well as the last enhancement played in the current battle if it was played by your opponent.  Interrupting the battle interrupts the battle flow at the point where you played the interrupt.  It does not send you back to the beginning of the battle and does not include special abilities completed prior to the interrupt being played that are no longer pending.

So if you had initiative and an interrupt the battle card of the right brigade, you would be able to use it to stop golden shield.

gold shield is an instant ability, not an ongoing ability. it cannot be interrupted, only negated.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #141 on: August 26, 2008, 07:52:11 PM »
0
gold shield is an instant ability, not an ongoing ability. it cannot be interrupted, only negated.

You can interrupt the battle to interrupt Gold Shield, provided you have a card in the appropriate brigade to do so.

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #142 on: August 26, 2008, 07:59:53 PM »
0
Right.  I think the wording can be a bit confusing.

Since it says " ‘Interrupt the battle’ interrupts all active ongoing abilities on characters and enhancements", if it only interrupted ongoing abilities then there would be no need for it to also say "as well as the last enhancement played in the current battle if it was played by your opponent."

I think the phrase you bolded is just reiterating that it doesn't interrupt instant abilities that are NOT the last enhancement played by opponent.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #143 on: August 26, 2008, 08:19:58 PM »
0
im fairly certain words, reach, etc cannot interrupt instant abilities. the part i bolded looks pretty clear to me, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. if its not a pending/ongoing ability, it cannot be interrupted via words/reach/etc. its not a reiteration of the first clause, its a clarification.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2008, 08:23:57 PM by Master KChief »
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #144 on: August 26, 2008, 08:24:18 PM »
0
You can interrupt the battle to interrupt Gold Shield, provided you have a card in the appropriate brigade to do so.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #145 on: August 26, 2008, 08:26:34 PM »
0
from the REG:

Quote
does not include special abilities completed prior to the interrupt being played that are no longer pending.

special ability? check.
completed prior to interrupt? check.
no longer pending/ongoing? check.

crystal clear.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #146 on: August 26, 2008, 08:28:33 PM »
0
im fairly certain words, reach, etc cannot interrupt instant abilities. the part i bolded looks pretty clear to me, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. if its not a pending/ongoing ability, it cannot be interrupted via words/reach/etc. its not a reiteration of the first clause, its a clarification.

Next time someone plays reach against my battle winner I will tell them your ruling.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #147 on: August 26, 2008, 08:29:47 PM »
0
from the REG:

Quote
abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #148 on: August 26, 2008, 08:36:16 PM »
0
from the REG:

Quote
abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal

You can interupt most battle winners with reach.


In Him :)

         H13
« Last Edit: August 26, 2008, 08:59:32 PM by TheHobbit13 »

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Gold Shield
« Reply #149 on: August 26, 2008, 08:36:43 PM »
0
from the REG:
Quote
abilities that are causing you to lose the battle by removal

If an ability causing you to lose by removal is instant, your logic says it cannot be interrupted.

If you allow the play for abilities that cause you to lose by removal, you must necessarily allow also the play for the last Enhancement if your opponent played it.

In other words, if you acknowledge that any one of those conditions is considered first, and then the last sentence to address cards outside that condition, you must give the same consideration to all those conditions.

Therefore, you can interrupt the battle to interrupt Gold Shield, provided you have a card in the appropriate brigade to do so.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal