Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
Quote from: Ring Wraith on January 18, 2010, 05:37:44 PMQuote from: Minister Polarius on January 18, 2010, 05:27:22 PMI wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.because being able to draw 4 cards (Archer + anybody w/ Namaan's Chariot and 2k Horses) followed by Gib's Trick, Wonder's Forgotten, Forgotten History, and Haman's Plot isn't a problem?Make up your mind, is the offense or the defense broken?
Quote from: Minister Polarius on January 18, 2010, 05:27:22 PMI wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.because being able to draw 4 cards (Archer + anybody w/ Namaan's Chariot and 2k Horses) followed by Gib's Trick, Wonder's Forgotten, Forgotten History, and Haman's Plot isn't a problem?
I wouldn't have a problem with banning all Enhancements that cause more than two cards to be drawn by a given player.
Honestly I'm not sure this idea is feasible with current redemption cardsI like it but it would basically require its own new cardsJust Evil and Good cards A brand new game as whole would be cool though
As said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.
Then it will return to Warriors-era FbtN domination.
Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on July 08, 2012, 08:49:52 AMAs said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?
If you fear ET, use DD or Wasting Disease.I believe this type has potential; as the combos on offense get ridiculous, the combos on defense get ridiculous. ET whatever draw your whole deck is all well and good, but what happens when he's blocked by a Reheboam from hand who wrecks havoc on you with his own offensive cards, plays Mayhem, Confusions your SoG, and plays whatever else he wants with the tons of initiative you afforded him with your books?
i just found a thread with RR's take on itbut i think it was my idea first and so i improved alot on it and here it isType CDMDominants: No Dominants
Quote from: Minister Polarius on January 17, 2010, 05:33:40 AMIf you fear ET, use DD or Wasting Disease.I believe this type has potential; as the combos on offense get ridiculous, the combos on defense get ridiculous. ET whatever draw your whole deck is all well and good, but what happens when he's blocked by a Reheboam from hand who wrecks havoc on you with his own offensive cards, plays Mayhem, Confusions your SoG, and plays whatever else he wants with the tons of initiative you afforded him with your books?Quote from: New Raven BR on January 09, 2010, 02:58:58 PMi just found a thread with RR's take on itbut i think it was my idea first and so i improved alot on it and here it isType CDMDominants: No Dominants
Quote from: New Raven BR on July 09, 2012, 10:46:28 PMQuote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on July 08, 2012, 08:49:52 AMAs said my only issue is it will be a CBN fight.is that a problem if there is a cbn fight or do i have to make a rule of no cbn cards?Just have an additional rule that states that CBN (and the old-timey CBPIorN) is the same as CBP.
ANB off treasurer pre-block
Quote from: wmd1999 on July 13, 2013, 04:23:34 PMANB off treasurer pre-block This is just one example of why I don't think this format could really work. When designing cards we often pick colors specifically to avoid game-breaking problems.
Why et acop does the same thing accept its much better?
