Author Topic: Your proposal for def for Genesis  (Read 941 times)

Offline Reth

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1278
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Your proposal for def for Genesis
« on: October 28, 2016, 06:44:42 PM »
0
Hi there,

just wanted to know what your proposal for a defense would be for a Genesis deck?
Currently have all Genesis heroes including some blue/green ones and Melchizedek.

Thanks for your proposals!

Bye

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Your proposal for def for Genesis
« Reply #1 on: October 29, 2016, 01:56:04 PM »
0
Egyptians have pretty good synergy with Genesis Heroes: Joseph can search for (or protect, depending on the version) Storehouse, which can be used by The Dreaming Pharaoh to draw; Pharaoh's Baker can count Genesis Heroes for his X value; Seven Years of Plenty (and to a lesser extent, Famine, depending on the strategy) goes well with both Gen Heroes and Egyptians. Also, since many of the best Egyptians are Genesis, if they get converted (by you or someone else) they don't egatively affect the abilities of Zebulun and Benjamin.

I personally haven't tried an antediluvian-themed defense, but there is also some synergy there, but that would be more aimed at Flood Survivors, so it depends on the offense you have.

Philistines and Romans have historically been good pairings with a Genesis deck, Philistines because they are more character focused than Enhancement focused, so cards like Eve and Noah help the defense out well; Romans because they go well with the theme of hand-thinning that is popular among many good Genesis cards (the 2008 National Tournament winning deck was a Genesis/Romans hand control deck).

There are tons of other options of course, but I'd say those are the top 4.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Ironisaac

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1662
  • 2070 Paradigm Shift Inbound
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Your proposal for def for Genesis
« Reply #2 on: October 29, 2016, 02:09:32 PM »
0
Egyptians have pretty good synergy with Genesis Heroes: Joseph can search for (or protect, depending on the version) Storehouse, which can be used by The Dreaming Pharaoh to draw; Pharaoh's Baker can count Genesis Heroes for his X value; Seven Years of Plenty (and to a lesser extent, Famine, depending on the strategy) goes well with both Gen Heroes and Egyptians. Also, since many of the best Egyptians are Genesis, if they get converted (by you or someone else) they don't egatively affect the abilities of Zebulun and Benjamin.

I personally haven't tried an antediluvian-themed defense, but there is also some synergy there, but that would be more aimed at Flood Survivors, so it depends on the offense you have.

Philistines and Romans have historically been good pairings with a Genesis deck, Philistines because they are more character focused than Enhancement focused, so cards like Eve and Noah help the defense out well; Romans because they go well with the theme of hand-thinning that is popular among many good Genesis cards (the 2008 National Tournament winning deck was a Genesis/Romans hand control deck).

There are tons of other options of course, but I'd say those are the top 4.

I would try Syrians instead of Romans. You can have many of the same hand control elements found with Romans, but you have very some very strong capture abilities as well, along with the awesome new Syrians from CoW.
Some call me "Goofus"

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Your proposal for def for Genesis
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 01:30:45 AM »
0
The problem with Syrians over Romans is that Genesis relies on a lot of Enhancement use for its power, as do Syrians, whereas Romans are able to accomplish a lot more through characters alone. It is precarious to pair two enhancement-dependent strategies in the same deck. Not to mention, some of the biggest aspects of hand control synergy are Romans-only. Mayhem delenda est.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal