« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Does this deck have potential?  (Read 1772 times)

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Does this deck have potential?
« on: June 21, 2010, 12:09:39 PM »
0
It seems to have the right "proportions".  Thanks.

56 cards

8 lost souls

first round protect
nt only
female only
anti-burial
lost souls 2 line
shuffler
exchanger
hopper

10 dominants

guardian of your souls
grapes of wrath
son of god
new jerusalem
harvest time
christian martyr
burial
falling away
destruction of nehushtan

3 fortresses

the garden tomb
the tabernacle
high priest's palace

2 covenants

I am Grace
Covenant with Moses

3 curses

captured ark
unknown nation
go into captivity

4 artifacts

unholy writ
holy grail
holy of holies
lampstand

8 evil characters

uzzah
prince of this world (priests)
the amalekite slave
seven sons of sceva
king of tyrus
12 fingered giant
phil armor bearer
women as snares

3 evil enhancements

torment
destructive sin TxP
image of jealousy TxP

9 heroes

salome
mary mother of james
moses
phinehas
lydia
john
woman at the well
suzanna
melchizedek (priests)

7 hero enhancements

aocp
reach of desperation
zeal for the lord
words of encouragement
consider the lillies
brass serpent promo
spirit as a dove promo
« Last Edit: June 21, 2010, 02:19:45 PM by stefferweffer »
Logged

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2010, 12:19:54 PM »
0
definitely has potential. it is, after all, a speed TGT deck...
Logged

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2010, 01:12:24 PM »
0
I've never made on like this before.  I'd like to find a way to work in Women as Snares too.
Logged

Offline Mr.Hiatus

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1756
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2010, 01:36:12 PM »
0
What's this deck supposed to do? The Name of the Lord? The Tabernacle? No TGT... a btn offense would thrash this, a common capn band would crush it, and anyone who plays with enhs should walk right through the defense. Sorry.
Logged

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2010, 01:52:56 PM »
0
Quote from: Mr.Hiatus on June 21, 2010, 01:36:12 PM
What's this deck supposed to do? The Name of the Lord? The Tabernacle? No TGT... a btn offense would thrash this, a common capn band would crush it, and anyone who plays with enhs should walk right through the defense. Sorry.
LOL.  FORGOT THE GARDEN TOMB!  Fixing :)
Logged

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2010, 01:54:31 PM »
0
It can definitely work. Although I'd suggest cutting it down to 50 cards.

EDIT: Also, I'm counting 57 cards in this.
« Last Edit: June 21, 2010, 01:57:42 PM by Rawrlolsauce! »
Logged

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2010, 01:59:26 PM »
0
Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on June 21, 2010, 01:54:31 PM
It can definitely work. Although I'd suggest cutting it down to 50 cards.
I thought about that also, but I decided instead that I would like more defense.  I know it slows it down (by two turns or so) for drawing out the deck, but I'd rather at least pretend to put up a fight :)
Logged

Offline King Leo

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Kick Buttoski.... Aw Biscuts....BAAANNG!....AGAIN!
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2010, 01:49:19 PM »
0
TGT offense could blow past your defence. I like the offense. defence not so much.

King Leo 8)
Logged
(Kick Buttoski) "Do it all and then some."

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2010, 01:54:39 PM »
0
Quote from: King Leo on June 22, 2010, 01:49:19 PM
TGT offense could blow past your defence. I like the offense. defence not so much.

King Leo 8)
Can you explain how/why I'd be worried about facing another Garden Tomb deck?  I have both Destructive Sin and Image of Jealousy to deal with an opposing Garden Tomb.  I have two capture artifacts.  And I'm playing Garden Tomb myself.

Other than just making single color defense, which would not be that impressive if I only use 11 defensive cards, what would you like to see this deck have to counter Garden Tomb?
Logged

Offline King Leo

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Kick Buttoski.... Aw Biscuts....BAAANNG!....AGAIN!
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2010, 03:17:52 PM »
0
Sorry i over saw those

King Leo 8)
Logged
(Kick Buttoski) "Do it all and then some."

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2010, 10:49:06 PM »
0
so you give a ls
attack with your TGT
they surprise u with thier TGT character
u destructive sin your own tgt so they cant attack with thier guy
I am grace your destructive sin, attack
play image of jealosy on your TGT
I am grace jealosy, attack
win? :)

needs access i think...
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 10:51:18 PM by RTSmaniac »
Logged
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #11 on: June 23, 2010, 02:42:22 PM »
0
Quote from: RTSmaniac on June 22, 2010, 10:49:06 PM
so you give a ls
attack with your TGT
they surprise u with thier TGT character
u destructive sin your own tgt so they cant attack with thier guy
I am grace your destructive sin, attack
play image of jealosy on your TGT
I am grace jealosy, attack
win? :)

needs access i think...
I meant this to have Garden Tomb for a surprise rescue of the 4th or 5th lost soul, and not to have Garden Tomb out the entire game.  Garden Tomb + Salome/Mary (all played from hand) can be an unstoppable game winner for that crucial 3rd or 5th lost soul, with little way for an opponent to stop it.  And yes, Destructive Sin and IOK are in there to primarily stop someone else's Garden Tomb.

Access is hopefully not an issue with Woman at the Well, Hopper, HT and Amal Slave in there.  And I have several brigades anyway.  I should also point out that I meant the Melchizedek to be the one that is both purple and teal.  Which set is that one from?
« Last Edit: June 23, 2010, 03:00:09 PM by stefferweffer »
Logged

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Does this deck have potential?
« Reply #12 on: June 23, 2010, 02:54:16 PM »
0
Quote
Access is hopefully not an issue with Woman at the Well, Hopper, HT and Amal Slave in there.
Oh, i do not doubt this- just think it would be better with at least 3 access sites.
Logged
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal