Cactus Game Design Message Boards

For example, the phrase “regardless of protection” allows the modified ability to target any card that is immune or protected, even though it normally cannot.

Only the mentioned condition or ability “X” in the “regardless of X” is affected. For example, if a card is immune, or both protected and immune, then “regardless of protection” would still not allow that card to be a target, as the immunity is not avoided.

These 2 sentences in the new REG seem contradictory.  Am I missing something, or was something not added correctly?