Author Topic: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit  (Read 3963 times)

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« on: September 17, 2009, 01:38:21 AM »
0
will a negate evil enhancement card (for sake of argument, holy ground) work against deafening spirit once its already played?

Holy Ground
Type: Hero Enh. • Brigade: Red • Ability: 2 / 2 • Class: None • Special Ability: Negate and discard the last evil enhancement played in current battle. • Identifiers: OT, Based on Prophecy • Verse: Exodus 3:5 • Availability: F Deck

Deafening Spirit
Type: Evil Enh. • Brigade: Orange • Ability: 1 / 4 • Class: None • Special Ability: Negate and discard the last good Enhancement played this battle. You may treat this card as an Evil Character until the end of this battle. • Identifiers: NT, Connected with Demons • Verse: Mark 9:25 • Availability: Priests booster packs (Common)

"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2009, 02:43:59 AM »
0
No, because it is no longer an Enhancement.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2009, 02:53:00 AM »
0
thats what i was initially leaning towards.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+68)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10674
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2009, 08:04:21 AM »
0
That's what I always thought too but at Nationals it was ruled that DS would be negated.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2009, 09:44:05 AM »
0
That's what I always thought too but at Nationals it was ruled that DS would be negated.
That might have been ruled incorrectly.  I think I remember there being a thread about this before, and it was decided differently.  I don't have a strong opinion on this one, but it might be worth someone checking into more.

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2009, 09:46:54 AM »
0
I remember the thread prof mentioned I believe it was ruled differently.  I thought it was ruled that it couldn't be negated, because it is no longer the last evil enhancement in battle.
In AMERICA!!

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2009, 11:02:43 AM »
0
because it is no longer the last evil enhancement in battle.
What if you just negate any/all evil enhancements, as opposed to the last?

(Examples: Scapegoat, Covenant of Noah, etc.)

Timothy DS

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2009, 11:15:46 AM »
0
regardless if it has turned into an EC, it was originally an enhancement. Holy ground is worded "Negate and discard the last evil enhancement played in current battle"] I would have to believe that it would be negated.

Offline sk

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4028
  • I am a leaf on the wind.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • My Facebook
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2009, 12:28:18 PM »
0
Schaef thinks in this thread that because it is no longer an enhancement, it can no longer be targeted as one (assuming it is being treated as an EC).  The thread is also referenced here.
"I'm not cheating, I'm just awesome." - Luke Wolfe

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2009, 11:37:47 AM »
0
While Deafening Spirit is now a Character, it was an enhancment when played. Similar to how Holy Ground (a negate last) can negate an enhancment that was used then discarded (say Abner's Spear), I don't see why it wouldn't negate an enhancment that was used then converted. Now if there was a card that said "Negate and discard an Evil Enhancment in battle" (I'm sure there is, I just can't think of one atm) then it could not target DS, since DS is no longer an enhancement.

So basically, I disagree with The Schaef, but that's just because I don't see the difference between an enhancement becoming a discarded enhancement and an enhancement becoming an EC in terms of targetability as an enhancement.

The question remains, if a negate last can't negate DS, then what was the last enhancement played?
« Last Edit: September 18, 2009, 11:41:50 AM by Professoralstad »
Press 1 for more options.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2009, 01:40:07 PM »
0
The question remains, if a negate last can't negate DS, then what was the last enhancement played?
Presumably it would be whatever evil enhancement (if any) was played prior to DS.

On a side note, I'm still wondering if the outcome is the same when using a negate any/all rather than a negate last.

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2009, 01:50:22 PM »
0
Negate any won't work, since it's no longer an enhancement.

Negate all (not just enhancements) would negate it.  Negate all enhancements wouldn't.

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2009, 04:32:16 PM »
0
Hey,

I agree with Professor Alstad and his logic.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2009, 07:23:40 PM »
0
I agree as well. But for a card that says "negate one evil enhancements in battle," it wouldn't work, right prof?
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2009, 08:11:26 PM »
0
Negate any won't work, since it's no longer an enhancement.

Negate all (not just enhancements) would negate it.  Negate all enhancements wouldn't.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Timothy DS

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #15 on: September 19, 2009, 10:08:51 AM »
0
Regardless if it is an EC now it had the history of being the "last enhancement played" fitting the requirements for holy ground

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2009, 11:30:24 AM »
0
i see it pretty similiar to the gold shield/third heaven ruling. the state of something has changed, and therefore can no longer be used as before. with gold shield, you cant use an interrupt from the brigade you used to be, and with third heaven you cant use the interrupt/negate that was shuffled into the deck by it.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2009, 02:46:44 PM »
0
I think that might be a different type of thing chief. Those scenarios are true because cards are discarded, and therefore cannot be interrupted. This card stays in play... it just changes "form."
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2009, 03:35:08 PM »
0
no, its very similiar, especially in gold shields case. something has changed a 'state'; you are not allowed to do something based on somethings state. for gold shield you cannot interrupt with the color of previous brigade, and with third heaven you cannot interrupt with a card shuffled in. same thing...ds has now changed its state, and you cannot target a previous state.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline sk

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4028
  • I am a leaf on the wind.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • My Facebook
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2009, 04:27:05 PM »
0
Actually, all three are different.  Third Heaven gets rid of the interrupt.  Gold Shield makes it so the interrupt cannot be played.  Deafening Spirit changes the state of the enhancement to a character which might make it seem unable to be targeted by the interrupt.

However, I did a little digging, here's something from the REG:
"Placing a card in the discard pile removes it from play, but does not remove the ability to negate it by (1) interrupting the battle or (2) interrupting the last enhancement played in battle. However, a "negate last enhancement" negates the last enhancement regardless of its current state (in play, discard pile, converted to a character, etc.)."
« Last Edit: September 19, 2009, 04:29:13 PM by sk »
"I'm not cheating, I'm just awesome." - Luke Wolfe

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #20 on: September 19, 2009, 06:16:13 PM »
0
I agree as well. But for a card that says "negate one evil enhancements in battle," it wouldn't work, right prof?

That is certain. You cannot negate a character with a card that says negate an evil enhancement. You can (according to the REG--nice find sk) negate the last enhancement played, regardless of it's current state, with a card that says negate the last enhancement played.
Press 1 for more options.

Timothy DS

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Negate Evil Enhancement vs. Deafening Spirit
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2009, 08:09:07 AM »
0
However, I did a little digging, here's something from the REG:
"Placing a card in the discard pile removes it from play, but does not remove the ability to negate it by (1) interrupting the battle or (2) interrupting the last enhancement played in battle. However, a "negate last enhancement" negates the last enhancement regardless of its current state (in play, discard pile, converted to a character, etc.)."

as i figured.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal