Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
If 2 players have the same highest number of redeemed souls, they are tied for the most redeemed souls. In those cases, Grapes of Wrath does not allow an additional rescue attempt, since that player has the most Redeemed Souls.
All I know is that "most" is defined as superlative in my dictionary, which means above all else/others.
Quote from: BubbleBoy on September 07, 2009, 08:24:14 PMAll I know is that "most" is defined as superlative in my dictionary, which means above all else/others. IMHO, this one is pretty obvious.
QuoteIf 2 players have the same highest number of redeemed souls, they are tied for the most redeemed souls. In those cases, Grapes of Wrath does not allow an additional rescue attempt, since that player has the most Redeemed Souls.
Quote from: The Guardian on September 07, 2009, 06:49:02 PMQuoteIf 2 players have the same highest number of redeemed souls, they are tied for the most redeemed souls. In those cases, Grapes of Wrath does not allow an additional rescue attempt, since that player has the most Redeemed Souls. IMHO its pretty obvious that if I have 4 LS and another player has 4 LS we both have the most.
When a special ability on a card requires "the most" then "the most" needs to equal more than any other player.
Althought I though the ruling would go the other way, I like to see a good Dominant get a ruling that favors the offense.
Basing offenses on Dominants is a rather cheap way to play the game, imho.
Quote from: thestrongangel on October 04, 2009, 05:10:28 PMBasing offenses on Dominants is a rather cheap way to play the game, imho.Taking this literally (which I know is not intended), I agree. Without a chance at some Dominant rescues and blocks, players who are new to the game or financially strapped would lose to those who can get all the really hot cards and Regional/National promos. This gives the poor folk a chance. For the record, I can get any card I really want, and have most of the big promos. I lose anyway, because I'm not much of a player. However, I don't think just because you have the best, most expensive cards you should automatically have a big edge in tournaments. I like the option of some "cheap" play options. (And yes, I know Grapes isn't all that cheap, but you should play Magic...or try to buy a FSP.)