Author Topic: ehud question  (Read 7901 times)

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #50 on: August 09, 2009, 01:51:29 PM »
0
I had thought that we had established that Enters the battle and Begin a battle were the same, Thats how I've always understood it, if they're not then I think your order works. And theres no reason why I can't go for the N.T. soul with Maharai as a battle challenge, under the current rule system that is legal, (or at least in MN it is....)
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #51 on: August 09, 2009, 01:55:44 PM »
0
If you go for a battle challenge then you opt to not rescue a soul. Even if I'm wrong on that point, Great Mourning would not let you change the battle from a BC to a RA.

Also, I am almost 99.6% sure that Enters battle and Begins battle are two different things. I know this because I've abused Provisions + Hidden Treasures to CTB and then play cards. I've had that ruled to be legal, so I'm pretty sure that "begins the battle" is the last thing to activate, while anything on the hero activates the instant he enters battle.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #52 on: August 09, 2009, 02:03:25 PM »
0
I still disagree on Great Mourning, based upon the Burial Shroud conclusion. Activating Burial Shroud with Meal in Emmaus during a rescue attempt still allows a soul to be rescued based upon that thread (Which I can't seem to find...) Also Game rule says that a Battle can change between a rescue and a battle challenge any number of times during the battle phase (Much to the disdain of Site Players like me....)

Oh, and I'm still not convinced, that Begin and Enter battle are different, the hero hasn't entered battle until all abilities complete, (Game rule I'm pretty sure)
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #53 on: August 09, 2009, 02:04:27 PM »
0
But how is a battle allowed to turn into a RA when Great Mourning clearly states otherwise?

Regardless, thats an argument for another thread.  :D

*edit*

I know for an absolute fact that "begins battle" is the last thing to activate. Schaef said in another thread that Entering battle and activating abilities happen at the exact same instant.

I propose you this question then. Could I "begin a battle" with a lone green prophet, who just happens to have a banding ability. According to you, the instant he enters battle, I can use HT, and then band.

They decided that Begins Battle comes last so you can't abuse banding with cards like HT.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 02:08:22 PM by Lamborghini_diablo »

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #54 on: August 09, 2009, 02:15:37 PM »
0
Right, I agree with you completely with Begining a battle coming last, and I was 99.9% sure that Enter battle was the same as begining a battle. Could you pull the thread were Schaef says its not? Because I've always heard it ruled they were the same (From Chris, YMT etc.)

Also looking not at the game at all, doesn't it just make logical sense when you look at the two phrases Enter Battle and Begin Battle, don't they just seem to mean the same thing?
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #55 on: August 09, 2009, 02:30:53 PM »
0
Not at all. I see Entering Battle as physically walking into battle, and Beginning Battle as having taken the first shot.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #56 on: August 09, 2009, 02:56:20 PM »
0
Very well, I see your point. I have no idea now.
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #57 on: August 09, 2009, 03:02:45 PM »
0
Welcome to Redemption.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #58 on: August 09, 2009, 03:26:36 PM »
0

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #59 on: August 09, 2009, 03:32:22 PM »
0
I brushed over the main post in this thread and I have a question. What is the danger of this? I know there has to be something because it is just to obvious.

1. Push hero in battle and declare intent
2. Activate hero sa simultaneously
3. Activate, placed enhancements, gained abilities,
4. Activate weapons on hero.
5. Lather rinse repeat and hope it's legal.

Then you check other triggers.

There has to be a major problem, but this setup calms my brain atm.


Welcome to Redemption.

And we wonder why people lose interest  ::)
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 03:36:19 PM by TheHobbit13 »

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #60 on: August 09, 2009, 03:34:27 PM »
0

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #61 on: August 09, 2009, 03:36:25 PM »
0
I brushed over the main post in this thread and I have a question. What is the danger of this? I know there has to be something because it is just to obvious.

1. Push hero in battle and declare intent
2. Activate hero sa simultaneously
3. Activate, placed enhancements, gained abilities,
4. Activate weapons on hero.
5. Lather rinse repeat and hope it's legal.

There has to be a major problem, but this setup calms my brain atm.

I'd put weapons first, but the only situation where order might matter is if say, you placed a search enhancement, and the hero had 2kh converted on him, allowing him to play it.

Now that I think about it, there is absolutely NOTHING stating if placed enhs come before or after WC enhs. We reeeeallly need some rules written down for these cards.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2009, 03:39:25 PM by Lamborghini_diablo »

Offline frisian9

  • Official Playtester
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1225
  • So let it be written, so let it be done.
    • Pittsbugh Playgroup
Re: ehud question
« Reply #62 on: August 09, 2009, 03:39:46 PM »
0
The comments I am finding helpful in this thread is the push to get the detailed order of starting a battle clarified. What I put in the REG a couple years ago worked back then, but it's obvious it needs to be updated. I need time to look more carefully at what was said. I'll be back.

Mike
----------------------------------------------------------
Keeper of the REG (www.redemptionreg.com

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #63 on: August 09, 2009, 03:41:40 PM »
0
That's all most of us are looking for. Ever since the inception of placed enhancements, it's been foggy, but the lack of necessary clarification has made teh point pretty moot. Now that there's cool stuff to do, we need to iron this out.

TheHobbit13

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #64 on: August 09, 2009, 03:42:45 PM »
0
There has to be a major problem,

and hope it's legal.

Found the problem.

I ment problems in the card play because of it.



Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #65 on: August 09, 2009, 03:44:00 PM »
0
Yeah, definately try to talk with the other Powers that Be, especially Rob, and see if you guys can all come to a conclusion for the following question:

At which point in the order of abilities for a single card does a placed enhancement activate?

As I have said before, my gut tells me that it comes just after WC enhancements, but I have nothing to prove it.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #66 on: August 09, 2009, 03:47:39 PM »
0
Also needing clarification is Enter Battle VS Begin Battle, ironing that out too would be swell mike,

Thanks!
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #67 on: August 09, 2009, 03:48:41 PM »
0
As said, I know that one has been ruled before. I just don't know if those threads exist anymore.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #68 on: August 09, 2009, 03:51:24 PM »
0
Well right, its been ruled before, but the threads are gone, and I'm fairly certain based upon the fact that both of us are convinced that we're right, that its been ruled both ways.
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #69 on: August 09, 2009, 03:57:27 PM »
0
Either that or I'm just right. Cuz im cool like that.  8)

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #70 on: August 09, 2009, 04:10:54 PM »
0
Right,

But I Placed at Natz!!

Which is worth nothing in the long and short of it... ;)
www.covenantgames.com

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #71 on: August 09, 2009, 05:51:30 PM »
0
I'll settle this:

You're both wrong.  ;)
My wife is a hottie.

Offline everytribe

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1063
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: ehud question
« Reply #72 on: August 09, 2009, 06:40:41 PM »
0
It seems to me the real question is if you preload Samsons Sacrifice on Ehud would he kill him self before he choses the blocker. The answer is yes.
Old Guys Rule

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: ehud question
« Reply #73 on: August 09, 2009, 11:48:31 PM »
0
Well, thats exactly what we're debating here - Does that placed enhancement activate before or after Ehud. (In an Ideal world, and how it will be ruled eventually is before) However I'm (and other people) still aren't convinced that it doesn't happen til after.
www.covenantgames.com

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: ehud question
« Reply #74 on: August 09, 2009, 11:54:23 PM »
0
closest I have to direct proof:

--question 1 of 2-- Which activates first? Jacobs ability, or the enhancement placed on him?
[THE ENHANCEMENT, UNLESS THE ENHANCEMENT ADDS A CHARACTER TO BATTLE, IN WHICH CASE IT HAPPENS AFTER THE BAND]

from a PM.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal