Author Topic: Adding sites to battle. (Read 3946 times)

Rawrlolsauce! · « **on:** February 19, 2011, 07:27:10 PM »

I RA with some random hero. Can I add two sites to battle? I didn't see anything in the REG about it, but I only looked for about 25 seconds.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #1 on:** February 19, 2011, 07:35:16 PM »

i would say you can add as many sites as you want.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #2 on:** February 19, 2011, 07:42:10 PM »

I see no reason you couldn't. Say you push one in for access, soul gets buried, add another!

Cpt.Jaeger · « **Reply #3 on:** February 19, 2011, 08:16:08 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on February 19, 2011, 07:35:16 PM

i would say you can add as many sites as you want.

I agree.

Similar question, are EC's allowed to add sites to battle?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #4 on:** February 19, 2011, 09:54:15 PM »

No, I got that ruled at nationals. I tried to give my opponent access in order to add my site guard.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 20, 2011, 03:45:21 PM »

don't think i can have 2 sites tried using ends of the earth for acsess after having pushed nazerath into battle at ny tourney recently and got told no by roy

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #6 on:** February 20, 2011, 03:59:52 PM »

Gabe said yes.

Gabe · « **Reply #7 on:** February 20, 2011, 05:03:39 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on February 20, 2011, 03:59:52 PM

~~Gabe said yes.~~

The REG said yes.

Quote from: REG

Sites must be placed in the Field of Battle to gain access to your opponent’s sites. Multiple sites may be used. Site access cards in battle may not be removed prior to the battle resolution unless forced or allowed by another card.

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #8 on:** February 20, 2011, 05:33:34 PM »

I agree with ~~Gabe~~...the REG

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 20, 2011, 09:02:05 PM »

GRR REYZEN GRRR

Gabe · « **Reply #10 on:** February 20, 2011, 09:11:13 PM »

Quote from: christiangamer25 on February 20, 2011, 09:02:05 PM

GRR REYZEN GRRR

You and I both know that our brother Roy does the absolute best job he can.

I make ruling mistakes all the time at live tournaments. It's so much easier sitting here with the REG at my fingertips.

mviurilli · « **Reply #11 on:** February 20, 2011, 10:08:21 PM »

isnt it recommended that judges have the REG available?

MrMiYoda · « **Reply #12 on:** February 20, 2011, 10:27:50 PM »

Quote from: mviurilli on February 20, 2011, 10:08:21 PM

isnt it recommended that judges have the REG available?

I always have the REG handy on the computer, Mike. Matt was just as obedient and respectful to my judging as ever. That is how 'iive' mistakes are made. Sorry, Matt.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #13 on:** February 20, 2011, 11:42:15 PM »

its ok im just gonna remember for next time

everytribe · « **Reply #14 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:13:55 AM »

I agree with Roys ruling. You put sites into battle to gain acess to a lost soul, not so you can nagate the special ability on a site. The regs says you can use multiple sites meaning if one gets discarded or taken you can add another on for access. I don't think you should be allowed to put sites into battle if its not for site acess. That is not the intent of the reg entry.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #15 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:19:07 AM »

Intent really doesn't matter. As it reads now, you can. If they decide to change it because they intend it to be different, now they can. I really like this ruling.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #16 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:22:20 AM »

Hey Bill, what's the intent of Split Altar?

everytribe · « **Reply #17 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:23:30 AM »

Quote from: Ring Wraith on February 21, 2011, 12:19:07 AM

Intent really doesn't matter. As it reads now, you can. If they decide to change it because they intend it to be different, now they can. I really like this ruling.

Sure it does. Just like how you need to look at intent when you read the Constitution.

everytribe · « **Reply #18 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:24:51 AM »

Regs written years ago is alot different than a card rwrongly written.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #19 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:27:31 AM »

Quote from: everytribe on February 21, 2011, 12:24:51 AM

Regs written years ago is alot different than a card rwrongly written.

. Split Alter does not apply here.

I believe Gabe quoted the new REG.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #20 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:36:57 AM »

i quite frankly like being able to shut off nazerath by shoving it into battle lol

everytribe · « **Reply #21 on:** February 21, 2011, 12:55:23 AM »

The cost of putting Nazareth in your deck is that you can't search. Its pretty cheeap if you can just shove it into battle not for site access but just to avoid the cost.

Gabe · « **Reply #22 on:** February 21, 2011, 01:11:08 AM »

Quote from: Ring Wraith on February 21, 2011, 12:27:31 AM

I believe Gabe quoted the new REG.

I quoted the old REG that was written years ago.

Bill is older and wiser than all of us combined. He's earned the right to interpret things however he would like.

christiangamer25 · « **Reply #23 on:** February 21, 2011, 01:14:52 AM »

lol cheap or not as i read it now i can and will continue to do so lol

everytribe · « **Reply #24 on:** February 21, 2011, 01:21:20 AM »

Quote from: Gabe on February 21, 2011, 01:11:08 AM

Bill is older and wiser than all of us combined. He's earned the right to interpret things however he would like.

That dosen't mean i'm right. Thats why I'm looking forward to the type 2 tournament. With about six elders present we can hash things out in person.

News:

Author Topic: Adding sites to battle. (Read 3946 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk