Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Playgroup and Tournament Central => Redemption® Official Tournaments => Topic started by: Red on December 28, 2011, 08:37:16 PM

Title: Nats location?
Post by: Red on December 28, 2011, 08:37:16 PM
While it's most likely TN can we please get it confirmed soon please? I need to make sure before makeing plans.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on December 28, 2011, 08:40:43 PM
If I'm not mistaken, it was roughly 50 weeks ago that the dates and location of Natz was announced for this year, so we should be hearing back soon.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on December 28, 2011, 09:10:33 PM
um.... 2012?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on December 28, 2011, 09:13:17 PM
Reread what I said, I was pretty clear. We heard about this year's Nats about this time of year, so it should be in the next couple weeks.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Gabe on December 28, 2011, 09:50:55 PM
Nats in MN for 2011 was already decided by Rob at the time he chose to have Nats 2010 in Boston. But the Boston Nats was not announced until sometime in February (or maybe March) of that year I believe. When I talked to Rob in MN about Nationals for 2012 he indicated that there was no strong leaning towards any particular place at that time. I suspect we might have to wait couple months before we hear anything certain.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: katedid on December 29, 2011, 12:17:45 AM
well, there are a bazillion people who wouldnt mind it in upstate NY otherwise we would never ever get to go to one. and Im being really serious on this one
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on December 29, 2011, 12:23:38 AM
well, there are a bazillion people who wouldnt mind it in upstate NY otherwise we would never ever get to go to one. and Im being really serious on this one
The problem with that is there was one in Boston just two years ago. There are many other groups across the country in the same scenario, so it is unlikely nats will be in the NE again so soon.

I think Gabe should host nats alone. As in, so he can't play. Iowa is due anyway.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: czepp on December 30, 2011, 11:40:32 AM

I think Gabe should host nats alone. As in, so he can't play. Iowa is due anyway.

But you just had Nats in MN, a state away! I agree with the 2012 host should be located in the South Eastern part of the country (TN, NC, SC).
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: I am Knot a Blonde! on December 30, 2011, 12:01:18 PM

I think Gabe should host nats alone. As in, so he can't play. Iowa is due anyway.

But you just had Nats in MN, a state away! I agree with the 2012 host should be located in the South Eastern part of the country (TN, NC, SC).

Florida...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on December 30, 2011, 12:11:39 PM

I think Gabe should host nats alone. As in, so he can't play. Iowa is due anyway.

But you just had Nats in MN, a state away! I agree with the 2012 host should be located in the South Eastern part of the country (TN, NC, SC).

Florida...
If it's not in Rochester, I'm for this.  Then they'll stop complaining about "all the players that get to go to Nats"
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on December 30, 2011, 06:40:30 PM
how many years do you think it will be until MN is in the running for nats again.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on December 30, 2011, 07:10:50 PM
how many years do you think it will be until MN is in the running for nats again.
Quite a few.  Rob tries to space them out.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on December 30, 2011, 07:11:16 PM
how many years do you think it will be until MN is in the running for nats again.
2015 would be a possibility.

Places nats should never be, IMO: California (and the entire western states), Florida, Canada, Maine, Oregon. They are all too remote to warrant a nats. Northeast coast is only saved due to the amount of players over there. I'm sick of the whole "we never get a nats..." card, since there's so much more to a nats than the local playgroup. Location is pretty much everything.

I'm 100% behind TN 2012, since I'll likely be moving down there in August.  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on December 30, 2011, 07:14:45 PM
Tennessee just makes sense, so I'm not sure what the debate would be.

how many years do you think it will be until MN is in the running for nats again.

Minnesota is in a perpetual state of running.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on December 30, 2011, 07:18:17 PM
how many years do you think it will be until MN is in the running for nats again.

Minnesota is in a perpetual state of running.
It'll be awhile before MN is ready to take the nats touch of death. We likely wouldn't want to host one until at least 3 years from now. I can't speak for Bill and Co., but the southern playgroups can't do it at this point.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: EmJayBee83 on January 01, 2012, 07:26:19 PM

I think Gabe should host nats alone. As in, so he can't play. Iowa is due anyway.

But you just had Nats in MN, a state away! I agree with the 2012 host should be located in the South Eastern part of the country (TN, NC, SC).
It doesn't matter to me in which state that Gabe is designated to host in.  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 01, 2012, 09:01:34 PM
Tennessee is a pretty solid location all things considered. It's not quite as bad as Minnesota was for us Northeasterners, especially Kittens and Friends, along with the MA playgroups. It looks like it's about half the time for me in fact, which is something is exciting. It's also not too horribly far for the MN groups, and it gives the Florida groups a chance to possibly come. My personal preference would be Georgia, since I have family in Atlanta, but there you go.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on January 01, 2012, 09:06:34 PM
And to mention that I'm in close proximity to TN. So it's all good with us in Bama. :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 01, 2012, 09:22:18 PM
My preference would be either NY, South Georgia or Florida.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Drrek on January 01, 2012, 09:32:04 PM
I'm fine with anywhere that I can get a ride to from someone else to go, so a place like Tennessee or NY would probably be good for me too.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 01, 2012, 09:37:42 PM
I'm fine with anywhere that I can get a ride to from someone else to go, so a place like Tennessee or NY would probably be good for me too.

I know that if it's in the southern states, Randall would likely be picking me up, and if he ends up taking one of the Roberts vans, he should have room for you. If by some miracle he gets it, there's always a place in my vehicle for you.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 01, 2012, 10:59:09 PM
If it's in Florida it's also very possible that I will be driving down, possibly by myself as I have people to visit in the state and would not want to ask anyone I was riding with to come with me. So I would be able to help with transportation either down or back but not both as I would either be going down a few days early or leaving a few days late. Hypothetically this situation would be for a group travelling together who CAN bring all their people but it would be uncomfortable to carry that many people in one vehicle I could eliviate (though I can't apparently spell it) the discomfort one way.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 01, 2012, 11:05:49 PM
As far as I know, Florida won't be making a bid.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 01, 2012, 11:07:24 PM
Sad face. I've been trying to get down there for months. Thought I finally had an excuse.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 01, 2012, 11:19:35 PM
Sad face. I've been trying to get down there for months. Thought I finally had an excuse.

You can always come visit. We have a guest room with a private bath. I live 8 miles from Disney. We could hold an impromptu tournament and maybe coax the South Florida guys to come up.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 01, 2012, 11:22:24 PM
Hmm are you close to, or in a central location of, Tampa, Gainesville, Tallahassee, or Deltona?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 01, 2012, 11:27:19 PM
Hmm are you close to, or in a central location of, Tampa, Gainesville, Tallahassee, or Deltona?

I live in what is called Four Corners, the intersection of four counties: Orange (Orlando - Disney, Universal Studios, Sea World), Polk (Davenport - near Legoland), Lake (Clermont - orange groves for miles), and Osceola (Kissimmee - where I teach).

I am one hour from Tampa (Busch Gardens), one hour from Deltona (where my brother used to live), several hours from Gainesville (home of the Gators, where my college roommate used to live), and nowhere near Tallahassee (home of the Seminoles).
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 01, 2012, 11:31:28 PM
Hmm well one hour is good. If you had the tournament maybe, buy I do have places to stay in all of the aforementioned Cities so I don't actually require a place to stay but thank you for the offer :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 01, 2012, 11:34:52 PM
Hmm well one hour is good. If you had the tournament maybe, buy I do have places to stay in all of the aforementioned Cities so I don't actually require a place to stay but thank you for the offer :D

Just PM me when you are in the area, and we'll see what we can do. On rare occasions, I can get people into Disney for free. But timing is everything, since Cast Members have blockout dates.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: I am Knot a Blonde! on January 02, 2012, 08:46:08 AM
Consider Florida bidded for.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 02, 2012, 10:47:26 AM
As far as I know, Florida won't be making a bid.

Just to clarify, I said I would not be making a bid for Orlando Metro, but other groups in Florida may still make a bid, as evidenced by:

Consider Florida bidded for.

It appears that the South Florida guys have put in a bid. Good luck to you guys! May Knot get Nats!  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: I am Knot a Blonde! on January 02, 2012, 11:21:31 AM
As far as I know, Florida won't be making a bid.

Just to clarify, I said I would not be making a bid for Orlando Metro, but other groups in Florida may still make a bid, as evidenced by:

Consider Florida bidded for.

It appears that the South Florida guys have put in a bid. Good luck to you guys! May Knot get Nats!  ;D

I mean, I have no idea where, when, who, and how it will be hosted in Florida, but if theres a will, theres a way :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 02, 2012, 11:28:44 AM
So is there a legit bid for Florida in the works, or not?

EDIT: as of 12:40, Rochester, NY has made a bid!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: EmJayBee83 on January 02, 2012, 01:19:21 PM
So is there a legit bid for Florida in the works, or not?

EDIT: as of 12:40, Rochester, NY has made a bid!
As a Christmas surprise for Gabe, I put in a bid under his name back in mid-December.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 02, 2012, 01:24:00 PM
So is there a legit bid for Florida in the works, or not?

EDIT: as of 12:40, Rochester, NY has made a bid!
As a Christmas surprise for Gabe, I put in a bid under his name back in mid-December.

What a coincidence! As a Christmas surprise for Gabe, I put a bid under his name back in mid-December!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on January 02, 2012, 02:44:39 PM
If the NE gets it or FL even I will really scratch my head...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 02, 2012, 03:08:24 PM
Florida would get it for the same reason CA got it three years ago, and frankly, that's not a bad reason at all.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 02, 2012, 03:09:01 PM
So is there a legit bid for Florida in the works, or not?

I'm pretty sure the South Florida guys were interested in making a bid. Actually, they were probably waiting for me to make a bid, but that will not be happening, so they will have to take their own initiative.

With all due respect to South Florida Redemption, Miami is the farthest that anyone in the country would ever have to travel (except Alaska), and the playgroup is only a couple years old, so that would be a tough bid to win. Tennessee has a playgroup that has been established for many years, and that area is long overdue. TN is also within easy reach of many other playgroups in GA and KY, and is significantly closer to MN than Florida would have been (especially Miami). I don't think people realize just how far Orlando is from the border of GA, and how far Miami is from Orlando.

New York had Nats within the last few years, whereas the Southeast has not had one in a very long time. Was New Orleans the last? I think that TN is the most logical choice, but that would assume that TN is even putting in a bid. I think the guys in TN/GA/KY should get together to put in a bid as soon as possible, if they have not already. I know the New York group is very eager, and has many National-level players ready to go, but TN should get first preference IMHO. Realize that I say that with no intention of attending Nats, even if it is in TN.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 02, 2012, 03:13:22 PM
It's understandable, and I will be happy if the guys down in TN get it.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 02, 2012, 03:18:42 PM
I agree with YMT, especially about travel times (I've visited Florida roughly 12 times). I think TN should get it this year, then NY next year.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 02, 2012, 03:22:02 PM
Where exactly is the TN playgroup?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red Wing on January 02, 2012, 03:28:25 PM
Where exactly is the TN playgroup?
I don't know exactly (because I'm not in TN), but there a lot tourneys on the Cactus page in Knoxville.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: adotson85 on January 02, 2012, 03:33:09 PM
Where exactly is the TN playgroup?
I don't know exactly (because I'm not in TN), but there a lot tourneys on the Cactus page in Knoxville.

That is correct. I'm pretty sure Knoxville is putting in a bid for Natz.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 02, 2012, 03:51:52 PM
Realize that I say that with no intention of attending Nats, even if it is in TN.
This is unfortunate.  I know that you've had a couple negative experiences at larger tournaments (ie. state or regional) in the past, but I really believe that they were flukes and wish that you could experience the blast that Nats is.

Besides, the GA guys came to your regional down there last summer, can't you return the favor by driving up to TN to join them?  Or how about that guy from KY who drove all the way down there for a local of yours, you know you want to come up to TN to hang out with him, right?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 02, 2012, 04:02:00 PM
This is unfortunate.  I know that you've had a couple negative experiences at larger tournaments (ie. state or regional) in the past, but I really believe that they were flukes ....

The general demeanor on the boards would indicate that they were not flukes.

Besides, the GA guys came to your regional down there last summer, can't you return the favor by driving up to TN to join them?

Knoxville is 650 miles away, which would be a minimum of 10 hours.

Or how about that guy from KY who drove all the way down there for a local of yours, you know you want to come up to TN to hang out with him, right?

The difference, of course, between that Prof-from-KY/GA-guys and me would be that I would have to travel with my children, including a one-year-old. Unlike you guys, we have no relatives nearby that could watch my children. Remember that I am the over-protective, ultra-conservative, over-the-hill windbag that would not trust his kids with anyone else.  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: TheHobbit13 on January 02, 2012, 05:20:26 PM
This is unfortunate.  I know that you've had a couple negative experiences at larger tournaments (ie. state or regional) in the past, but I really believe that they were flukes ....

The general demeanor on the boards would indicate that they were not flukes.


I don't know. It seems to me that the people who may give you this impression are the ones that are the most vocal, while the players who promote a healthy winning enviroment are the mostly silent on the matter (to them there is no issue). So it doesn't seem very fair to label the demeanor on the boards this way. Besides in person everyones cool.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: adotson85 on January 02, 2012, 05:23:37 PM
If TN does get Natz, I know allegiant offers very reasonable prices on flights from Orlando, Tampa, and several other points from Florida to Knoxville.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 02, 2012, 05:26:14 PM
Besides in person everyones cool.

I'm actually more of a jerk in person.  :maul:

If TN does get Natz, I know allegiant offers very reasonable prices on flights from Orlando, Tampa, and several other points from Florida to Knoxville.

"Reasonable" is a relative term, especially on a teacher's salary travelling with my wife and three kids.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 02, 2012, 05:27:01 PM
Knoxville is 650 miles away, which would be a minimum of 10 hours.
Think of it as a fun family road trip, or some time for father-son bonding :)
I would have to travel with my children, including a one-year-old.
Two options come to mind.  Perhaps your wife wouldn't mind having some "girl-time" while you and your son were gone for a few days.  Or perhaps the whole family could come to Knoxville, and the ladies could see the sights for a few days while you fellas played Redemption.
in person everyones cool.
This is a good point.  My experience is that even people who don't seem to get along very well on the boards, actually get along MUCH better when they are in person.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 02, 2012, 05:35:28 PM
Think of it as a fun family road trip, or some time for father-son bonding :)

Kia Fortes are not the ideal "road trip" car, especially with five people cramped together (including a baby car seat and a toddler booster seat). Our minivan has no AC.

Perhaps your wife wouldn't mind having some "girl-time" while you and your son were gone for a few days.

Taking care of a baby who sleeps for no more than two hours at a time does not leave much "girl time."

 
Or perhaps the whole family could come to Knoxville, and the ladies could see the sights for a few days while you fellas played Redemption.

We have not travelled outside Florida since we moved here in 2008. If we were to have a family trip, it would have to be to Virginia to visit the family that we have said were too far away to visit.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on January 02, 2012, 05:50:51 PM
I say MN again because everyone was happy and healthy, and there was Type S, and there were bathrooms with showers, and across the hallway(for the comfort of CountFount and all the other old guys there), and it had it's own restaurant in the church, and mattresses for people to sleep on, and...,and...,and...

THE POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS!!!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 02, 2012, 05:57:48 PM
I say MN again because everyone was happy and healthy, and there was Type S, and there were bathrooms with showers, and across the hallway(for the comfort of CountFount and all the other old guys there), and it had it's own restaurant in the church, and mattresses for people to sleep on, and...,and...,and...

THE POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS!!!

The venue was good, the 24 hour one-way trips were not. I'm all for a MN nationals (I'm doing my best to make it the T2 only), however, TN is about half the distance for me. It will be a couple years before I commit to a MN nationals again. At least with a Florida natz, I can convince the family to go to Florida and see the sights while I win Extreme Booster, and the trip down tends to be more scenic.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: soul seeker on January 02, 2012, 06:14:46 PM
This is a good point.  My experience is that even people who don't seem to get along very well on the boards, actually get along MUCH better when they are in person.

OR  they avoid each other.  People, especially those who argue on the internet, rarely confront each other in real life.  Plus, you will have so many people that you rarely see and enjoy their company that the ones that annoy you are easy to avoid.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 02, 2012, 06:17:22 PM
This is a good point.  My experience is that even people who don't seem to get along very well on the boards, actually get along MUCH better when they are in person.

OR  they avoid each other.  People, especially those who argue on the internet, rarely confront each other in real life.  Plus, you will have so many people that you rarely see and enjoy their company that the ones that annoy you are easy to avoid.

This is why I didn't go to Soul Seeker's last tourney

Spoiler (hover to show)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on January 02, 2012, 06:23:46 PM
The (bidding) Florida group is Fort Lauderdale, right? There's no Perkins there according to Perkin's website. Therefore, to TN!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: christiangamer25 on January 02, 2012, 06:27:41 PM
yeah thats typically true cause theres def people on here i can't stand this way but at real events im ok
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 02, 2012, 07:04:29 PM
I say MN again because everyone was happy and healthy, and there was Type S, and there were bathrooms with showers, and across the hallway(for the comfort of CountFount and all the other old guys there), and it had it's own restaurant in the church, and mattresses for people to sleep on, and...,and...,and...

THE POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS!!!
Give everyone actual beds in rooms, more showers, and authentic Rochester scenery (instead of that fake MN stuff), and you've got NY.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 02, 2012, 07:07:29 PM
Plus I'm in NY so really why is this even a debate? Who doesn't want to meet me?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on January 02, 2012, 07:29:36 PM
I say MN again because everyone was happy and healthy, and there was Type S, and there were bathrooms with showers, and across the hallway(for the comfort of CountFount and all the other old guys there), and it had it's own restaurant in the church, and mattresses for people to sleep on, and...,and...,and...

THE POSSIBILITIES ARE ENDLESS!!!
Give everyone actual beds in rooms, more showers, and authentic Rochester scenery (instead of that fake MN stuff), and you've got NY.
I actually consider Rochester NY fake and MN real.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 02, 2012, 07:39:27 PM
We were Rochester years before MN got around to copying us.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 02, 2012, 07:47:13 PM
Rochester, NY - Founded 1803
Rochester, MN - Founded1855
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: EmJayBee83 on January 02, 2012, 10:57:20 PM
Rochester, NY -- Beta Release
Rochester, MN -- GA Release
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Gabe on January 03, 2012, 01:05:42 PM
So is there a legit bid for Florida in the works, or not?

EDIT: as of 12:40, Rochester, NY has made a bid!
As a Christmas surprise for Gabe, I put in a bid under his name back in mid-December.

What a coincidence! As a Christmas surprise for Gabe, I put a bid under his name back in mid-December!

So apparently I'm hosting Nats. Let me know when y'all decide where you'd like to have it.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 03, 2012, 01:13:08 PM
Sure, just show up to Rochester, NY whenever, and we can host an impromptu Nats.

/That's how it works, right?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on January 03, 2012, 02:00:14 PM
Lewis XVI and Clark XV are hand delivering the bid from the Northwest territory.  Sacagawea XVII just delivered a message that the expedition is somewhere in the Snake River valley.  As long as P-Phil cooperates, the bid should arrive in time.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: TXJonathan on January 03, 2012, 11:31:12 PM
I hope the bid arrives in time.  :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: RTSmaniac on January 05, 2012, 09:42:49 AM
I'm actually more of a jerk in person.  :maul:

Dont let him fool you. Tim is a great guy.

I know Knoxville is having more tournaments including a local and a district every month. As long as Chris Fachman puts in a bid he should be in good contentions.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Deck Metrics on January 05, 2012, 01:27:33 PM
S. FL is not putting in a bid for Nats.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 05, 2012, 01:36:27 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 05, 2012, 01:37:19 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
50% chance?  I'll take that.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on January 05, 2012, 01:51:08 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
We aren't making a bid.  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 05, 2012, 01:53:27 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
We aren't making a bid.  ;)

Surely you jest.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 05, 2012, 02:01:09 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
We aren't making a bid.  ;)
It defaults to NY, seeing as we're awesomer.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on January 05, 2012, 05:38:29 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
We aren't making a bid.  ;)
It defaults to NY, seeing as we're awesomer.
I find that fact debatable.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on January 05, 2012, 05:43:11 PM
If you can rent out a Perkins for nats instead of using a Church or something, you'll have my support.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Drrek on January 05, 2012, 06:34:38 PM
Sounds like that leaves it to either Rochester or Tennessee.
We aren't making a bid.  ;)
It defaults to NY, seeing as we're awesomer.
I find that fact debatable.
fact
noun
1.  something that actually exists; reality; truth

if its a fact, it can't really be debatable
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on January 05, 2012, 06:48:47 PM
That being said, it's a weak argument of induction, not a fact.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on January 05, 2012, 07:01:25 PM
That being said, it's a weak argument of induction, not a fact.
Since they do not have Type S there and they are jealous.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 05, 2012, 07:41:15 PM
So I was driving home from work today and I started thinking about Nats, specifically whether I should reconsider putting in a bid for Florida. As I was deep in thought, a car suddenly cut me off on Route 192. Looking at the license plate, I noticed that they were from Tennessee. I continued driving and thinking, and then a minivan cuts in front of me, this time causing me to hit the brakes to avoid a collision. I was about to get mad, but then I noticed that he, too, had a TN license plate.

I mention this not to suggest that TN drivers are bad drivers, but rather that God was sending me a clear message to not put in a bid for FL, but instead to throw all of my support to TN. Clearly Nats will be in TN this year, based on divine revelation on Route 192.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 06, 2012, 01:54:18 PM
So I was driving home from work today and I started thinking about Nats, specifically whether I should reconsider putting in a bid for Florida. As I was deep in thought, a car suddenly cut me off on Route 192. Looking at the license plate, I noticed that they were from Tennessee. I continued driving and thinking, and then a minivan cuts in front of me, this time causing me to hit the brakes to avoid a collision. I was about to get mad, but then I noticed that he, too, had a TN license plate.

I mention this not to suggest that TN drivers are bad drivers, but rather that God was sending me a clear message to not put in a bid for FL, but instead to throw all of my support to TN. Clearly Nats will be in TN this year, based on divine revelation on Route 192.
...Because otherwise you'd be run down by TN drivers?  Believe me, NY drivers are even worse.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on January 06, 2012, 02:00:55 PM
So I was driving home from work today and I started thinking about Nats, specifically whether I should reconsider putting in a bid for Florida. As I was deep in thought, a car suddenly cut me off on Route 192. Looking at the license plate, I noticed that they were from Tennessee. I continued driving and thinking, and then a minivan cuts in front of me, this time causing me to hit the brakes to avoid a collision. I was about to get mad, but then I noticed that he, too, had a TN license plate.

I mention this not to suggest that TN drivers are bad drivers, but rather that God was sending me a clear message to not put in a bid for FL, but instead to throw all of my support to TN. Clearly Nats will be in TN this year, based on divine revelation on Route 192.
...Because otherwise you'd be run down by TN drivers?

I'm feeling a little run down by NIC drivers this week.   :-\
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Bobbert on January 14, 2012, 10:37:41 PM
I find that opinion debatable.

FTFY

I would start backing up Nameless, but it's a lost cause.  ::) I would put my support behind TN, since there is actually a remote possibility I could make it to that.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: megamanlan on January 20, 2012, 08:01:08 PM
So I was driving home from work today and I started thinking about Nats, specifically whether I should reconsider putting in a bid for Florida. As I was deep in thought, a car suddenly cut me off on Route 192. Looking at the license plate, I noticed that they were from Tennessee. I continued driving and thinking, and then a minivan cuts in front of me, this time causing me to hit the brakes to avoid a collision. I was about to get mad, but then I noticed that he, too, had a TN license plate.

I mention this not to suggest that TN drivers are bad drivers, but rather that God was sending me a clear message to not put in a bid for FL, but instead to throw all of my support to TN. Clearly Nats will be in TN this year, based on divine revelation on Route 192.
...Because otherwise you'd be run down by TN drivers?  Believe me, NY drivers are even worse.

Wisconsin has our fair share... plus all the others that came from all ur states to protest OUR state's bill... I guess we could make that into an add to visit Wisconsin...
"Come and Visit Wisconsin, were we have people from across the country protesting a bill that won't affect them. And all the drivers that are from out of state just to cut people off and cause more business for the hospitals!"
*sigh* I'd be glad w/ u all taking ur nut-jobs back.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 21, 2012, 03:31:54 AM
I think people protest a bill that doesn't effect them is exactly the kind of thing this country needs. They have no stake in the debat other then knowing the bill is wrong and is a violate of rights.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: CactusRob on January 25, 2012, 01:57:38 PM
Update on 2012 Nationals:

Knoxville, TN is my first choice.  Chris wants to host and he has support.  The issue is finding a venue large enough.  If that falls through, other options are:

Long Island, NY (Roy)
Rochester, NY (Randall, John M. and Roy)

or if either host is up for it:
Dallas, TX (Terry)
Jackson, KY (Mark)

For any of the above, I am aiming for 1st or 2nd week of August.

Thanks,
Rob
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on January 25, 2012, 01:58:42 PM
Cool beans 8)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 25, 2012, 02:02:45 PM
If TN doesn't work, I think Rochester is the best choice. Randall will be supplemented by two experienced tournament hosts, and I've seen his bid - Rochester, with an international airport and a relatively small population, would be perfect for how travel at Natz always ends up.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 25, 2012, 02:10:03 PM
If TN doesn't work, I think Rochester is the best choice. Randall will be supplemented by two experienced tournament hosts, and I've seen his bid - Rochester, with an international airport and a relatively small population, would be perfect for how travel at Natz always ends up.
Not to mention I've got an excellent postcount.  That's a qualification, right?

In all seriousness, I am honored with the fact that my name is up there at all.  Thank you for your consideration Rob, and many thanks to all you do for the game!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Tom Bombadil on January 25, 2012, 02:21:23 PM
Speaking as one of Randall's trainees and one who now also has a playgroup of around 3 to 5, if it helps at all I would like to rep my support for having the national tournament with Randall. If it helps the first and most recent tournament I hosted had 16 people and Randall was a big help so yeah. I just wanted to offer my support to Randall being the national tournament host.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: katedid on January 25, 2012, 02:33:03 PM
There used to be a fairly substantial playgroup at my church in Rochester about 7 years ago or so. I wasnt invovled then.  I wouldnt be surprised if a bunch of those people showed up if Nats were here.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: TechnoEthicist on January 25, 2012, 02:39:33 PM
Thank you for that posting Rob. If the dates are flexible, I would greatly prefer for the tournament to be 1st weekend of august since I have finals the second weekend (gotta love grad school). However, I do not want to impose and have everyone cater to my interests. TN would be a great location and I'm sure our friends in NY could take good care of us as well...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on January 25, 2012, 02:41:01 PM
I'd say go KY before NY. Mainly because, though it's been awhile since NY has had a nats, Boston just had one there. I also wouldn't mind Texas...there hasn't been something southern for years.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on January 25, 2012, 03:25:35 PM
I'd have to vote for first weekend of august as well. I have something school related the second weekend I'd prefer not to miss though I could. If chris can find a venue I'll be attendance at natz hahaha.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: soul seeker on January 25, 2012, 03:27:25 PM
I'd say go KY before NY. Mainly because, though it's been awhile since NY has had a nats, Boston just had one there. I also wouldn't mind Texas...there hasn't been something southern for years.
I've been to Mark's place multiple times...there are logistical problems that must be overcame in KY.
Also, Randall's NY location is pretty close to OH (basically west side of state) and no where near Boston (relatively speaking).*

* All of the NY info is biased information since I'm under 2 hours from Randall and therefore technically could sleep in my own bed every night of Nats.

Then again, of that list...only Texas would be difficult for me to travel too, so I'm pretty happy with Rob's list.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Crashfach2002 on January 25, 2012, 03:57:31 PM
Since my name is being thrown around let me clarify!

I'm currently contacting several churches and other large places finding out if we can use them and what the cost would be.  I have a place targeted but if I can find another one with comparable luxuries but cheaper I will be going for that one.  If I do host it will have to be the 2nd weekend of August since I will be at a wedding during the first weekend. (In FL, oh the irony)

So all this being said, unless the places are just far too costly for me to rent out (which is a possibility considering I unload trucks and my wife subs), I plan on having Nats in Knoxville!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on January 25, 2012, 04:07:59 PM
So all this being said, unless the places are just far too costly for me to rent out (which is a possibility considering I unload trucks and my wife subs), I plan on having Nats in Knoxville!
If that happens, let me know. I know it'll be much cheaper for me to go to Nats in Knoxville, and so I might be able to help with some of the difference.

TN for nats 2012! FTW!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 25, 2012, 04:40:33 PM
Since my name is being thrown around let me clarify!

I'm currently contacting several churches and other large places finding out if we can use them and what the cost would be.  I have a place targeted but if I can find another one with comparable luxuries but cheaper I will be going for that one.  If I do host it will have to be the 2nd weekend of August since I will be at a wedding during the first weekend. (In FL, oh the irony)

So all this being said, unless the places are just far too costly for me to rent out (which is a possibility considering I unload trucks and my wife subs), I plan on having Nats in Knoxville!
Congratulations!  Just don't sweat it too much if you can't afford it (if you know what I mean).
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: DDiceRC on January 25, 2012, 05:10:43 PM
While the NY venues are closer to me (and if Roy gets it, I can probably even come help out), I've already explored the idea of going to TN with my kids. Part of my "vacation negotiations" at home. :)

Then again, from Rochester I could visit my sister (about an hour or so away)...maybe we can really make Nats this year.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 25, 2012, 05:38:41 PM
or if either host is up for it:
Jackson, KY (Mark)
I also really appreciate being considered for this even as a backup plan.  I would LOVE to host a Nats someday, and really a lot of things are ideal here.  Being a boarding school, we actually have dorm rooms that people could stay in getting rid of the need for hotels.  We have a big new Gym that would be great for the actual tournament, and several smaller classrooms in the same building that would be great for trading/hang out rooms.  We have a dining room that could take care of food for people, and several fast food choices about 10 mins away for people who didn't want to eat on location.

Really the only downside would be the distance from an airport.  However, it is that very downside that has kept me from putting in a bid in the past.  Perhaps I will look into things a bit more and reconsider.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 25, 2012, 05:41:50 PM
or if either host is up for it:
Jackson, KY (Mark)
I also really appreciate being considered for this even as a backup plan.  I would LOVE to host a Nats someday, and really a lot of things are ideal here.  Being a boarding school, we actually have dorm rooms that people could stay in getting rid of the need for hotels.  We have a big new Gym that would be great for the actual tournament, and several smaller classrooms in the same building that would be great for trading/hang out rooms.  We have a dining room that could take care of food for people, and several fast food choices about 10 mins away for people who didn't want to eat on location.

Really the only downside would be the distance from an airport.  However, it is that very downside that has kept me from putting in a bid in the past.  Perhaps I will look into things a bit more and reconsider.

The New York bid is at a college so we also have all of these things as far as I know  ;D Randall would be the one to ask to confirm. We are also about 20 minutes from Rochester International (I think?) Airport
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on January 25, 2012, 05:54:22 PM
Obviously I'm a big fan of the TN option - Chris has done a great job in recent years hosting, and definitely deserves first option.

That being said, on a personal level, Long Island would be best for me :)

I like NY as the straight up second state choice - But I have family in Manhattan so obviously It'd work out really well for me in that regard.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 25, 2012, 06:10:39 PM
or if either host is up for it:
Jackson, KY (Mark)
I also really appreciate being considered for this even as a backup plan.  I would LOVE to host a Nats someday, and really a lot of things are ideal here.  Being a boarding school, we actually have dorm rooms that people could stay in getting rid of the need for hotels.  We have a big new Gym that would be great for the actual tournament, and several smaller classrooms in the same building that would be great for trading/hang out rooms.  We have a dining room that could take care of food for people, and several fast food choices about 10 mins away for people who didn't want to eat on location.

Really the only downside would be the distance from an airport.  However, it is that very downside that has kept me from putting in a bid in the past.  Perhaps I will look into things a bit more and reconsider.

The New York bid is at a college so we also have all of these things as far as I know  ;D Randall would be the one to ask to confirm. We are also about 20 minutes from Rochester International (I think?) Airport
...as well as transport options to/from.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 25, 2012, 06:13:27 PM
or if either host is up for it:
Jackson, KY (Mark)
I also really appreciate being considered for this even as a backup plan.  I would LOVE to host a Nats someday, and really a lot of things are ideal here.  Being a boarding school, we actually have dorm rooms that people could stay in getting rid of the need for hotels.  We have a big new Gym that would be great for the actual tournament, and several smaller classrooms in the same building that would be great for trading/hang out rooms.  We have a dining room that could take care of food for people, and several fast food choices about 10 mins away for people who didn't want to eat on location.

Really the only downside would be the distance from an airport.  However, it is that very downside that has kept me from putting in a bid in the past.  Perhaps I will look into things a bit more and reconsider.

The New York bid is at a college so we also have all of these things as far as I know  ;D Randall would be the one to ask to confirm. We are also about 20 minutes from Rochester International (I think?) Airport
...as well as transport options to/from.

I will prepare my gas tank...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: katedid on January 25, 2012, 10:46:54 PM
or if either host is up for it:
Jackson, KY (Mark)
I also really appreciate being considered for this even as a backup plan.  I would LOVE to host a Nats someday, and really a lot of things are ideal here.  Being a boarding school, we actually have dorm rooms that people could stay in getting rid of the need for hotels.  We have a big new Gym that would be great for the actual tournament, and several smaller classrooms in the same building that would be great for trading/hang out rooms.  We have a dining room that could take care of food for people, and several fast food choices about 10 mins away for people who didn't want to eat on location.

Really the only downside would be the distance from an airport.  However, it is that very downside that has kept me from putting in a bid in the past.  Perhaps I will look into things a bit more and reconsider.

The New York bid is at a college so we also have all of these things as far as I know  ;D Randall would be the one to ask to confirm. We are also about 20 minutes from Rochester International (I think?) Airport

Its actually less than 10 minutes.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: CJSports on January 27, 2012, 05:29:18 PM
I support Rochester or Long Island. TN and farther south would start getting hard.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on January 27, 2012, 07:38:30 PM
I don't have a lot to offer, but I will give as much financial support as I have available to a TN Nats if that will help you secure a location. I will not likely be attending, but several of my playgroup have family in TN, so they might make it.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Terry Markoff on January 29, 2012, 10:47:28 PM
I want to thank Rob for considering the Dallas area as a possible backup site for Nationals.  The Dallas area playgroup members (Ben Shadrick, Marcus Parker and I) have discussed  the possibilities of hosting a Nationals Tournament in the Dallas area in the not too distant future.

I am certain that my church would do whatever was necessary to assist by providing a site and volunteers to be host families to accomodate those players who would find it difficult to travel to Dallas and pay for a hotel.

We are honored to be considered regardless of which site is eventually chosen to host Nationals.

You would be hard pressed to find a more accomodating place or group of people than the players in our TX/Arkansas playgroup.

Terry Markoff (not a very good player but a fantastic host)

Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 29, 2012, 10:52:45 PM
You would be hard pressed to find a more accomodating place or group of people than the players in our TX/Arkansas playgroup.

Terry Markoff (not a very good player but a fantastic host)
I've been saying for years that TX would be a great place for a Nats some year.  Dallas is due :)

Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014.

These are totally just my personal guesses and have NOTHING to do with my elder status.  I know NOTHING.  This is NOT a spoiler.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 29, 2012, 11:02:16 PM
You would be hard pressed to find a more accomodating place or group of people than the players in our TX/Arkansas playgroup.

Terry Markoff (not a very good player but a fantastic host)
I've been saying for years that TX would be a great place for a Nats some year.  Dallas is due :)

Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014.

These are totally just my personal guesses and have NOTHING to do with my elder status.  I know NOTHING.  This is NOT a spoiler.

HE TRIED WAY TO HARD TO SAY HE KNOWS NOTHING!!! HE KNOWS!!!!!11!!one!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on January 29, 2012, 11:40:32 PM
Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014, with it returning to MN/IA/WI area in 2015
FTFY
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 29, 2012, 11:52:13 PM
HE TRIED WAY TO HARD TO SAY HE KNOWS NOTHING!!! HE KNOWS!!!!!11!!one!
I just wanted to make sure the no one was misled.  I know that people like to dig for leaks around here :)

Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014, with it returning to MN/IA/WI area in 2015
Well if we want to go out far enough...
2012 - TN
2013 - NY
2014 - TX
2015 - MN
2016 - FL
2017 - ??
2018 - KY (after they build the airport)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on January 30, 2012, 09:57:45 AM
Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014, with it returning to MN/IA/WI area in 2015
Well if we want to go out far enough...
2012 - TN
2013 - NY
2014 - TX
2015 - MN
2016 - FL
2017 - ??
2018 - KY (after they build the airport)
2156 - Lunar Base Alpha
2234 - New New York (Mars)

FTFY
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: zmc 9 on January 30, 2012, 10:20:46 AM
It should be in MN again :P
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Scoobug on January 30, 2012, 11:27:28 AM
I may be the only one on the boards but I think it should be in Atlanta, GA.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 11:52:06 AM
HE TRIED WAY TO HARD TO SAY HE KNOWS NOTHING!!! HE KNOWS!!!!!11!!one!
I just wanted to make sure the no one was misled.  I know that people like to dig for leaks around here :)

Assuming that 2012 is in TN, and that 2013 is back up North (Rochester, NY?), then I think Dallas would be a front-runner for 2014, with it returning to MN/IA/WI area in 2015
Well if we want to go out far enough...
2012 - TN
2013 - NY
2014 - TX
2015 - MN
2016 - FL
2017 - ??
2018 - KY (after they build the airport)

That's enough time for another NE Natz - who knows? In six years I'll be a grad student, so maybe I'll be up for it.

I may be the only one on the boards but I think it should be in Atlanta, GA.

There was actually a lot of talk for a GA nationals this year. I wonder what happened to all that.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 30, 2012, 12:05:53 PM
Pretty simple, nobody put in a bid. Everybody said "hey let's do it, but not me"
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on January 30, 2012, 01:31:41 PM
I would want GA over FL, just because it's a little bit closer.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on January 30, 2012, 01:53:59 PM
If I fly half way across the country, I'd at least want to go to a Devil Rays game with the other 4 fans. So FL over Georgia.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on January 30, 2012, 02:19:01 PM
They dropped the devil from their name years ago
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 30, 2012, 02:21:34 PM
There was actually a lot of talk for a GA nationals this year. I wonder what happened to all that.
The GA guys and the TN guys are actually pretty tight, and go to each other's tourneys.  I think the GA guys decided that they didn't really have a good venue for Nats, and therefore chose to go in with the TN guys to host it up there.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: COUNTER_SNIPER on January 30, 2012, 03:05:06 PM
I have taken the liberty of modifying the regional map in order to provide a visual understanding of why NATS locations are chosen:

Spoiler (hover to show)

Meant to make Alaska's "AK" into: AKA Canada
(Not meant to be offensive in any way)

(My final post. It's been good, I'm hardly known, but unless I'm allowed to make a new account, this is the last you'll hear from me! Post-wise anyway...) Not leaving the game, just wanted to stop my post count at 777 just for fun :P

Edit #2: I'll monitor the boards, I just won't post.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Crashfach2002 on January 30, 2012, 03:09:31 PM
There was actually a lot of talk for a GA nationals this year. I wonder what happened to all that.
The GA guys and the TN guys are actually pretty tight, and go to each other's tourneys.  I think the GA guys decided that they didn't really have a good venue for Nats, and therefore chose to go in with the TN guys to host it up there.

I will confirm this.  Outside of a few tournaments hosted by Clift or Tyler, there is no one really looking to host any tournaments for the near future and neither of those guys have a venue that is big enough for a large Regional tournament much less a National one.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red Wing on January 30, 2012, 03:12:12 PM
(My final post. It's been good, I'm hardly known, but unless I'm allowed to make a new account, this is the last you'll hear from me! Post-wise anyway...)
Does this mean you are leaving the game? I don't know you, but I'm always sad to see someone leave.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on January 30, 2012, 03:17:57 PM
(My final post. It's been good, I'm hardly known, but unless I'm allowed to make a new account, this is the last you'll hear from me! Post-wise anyway...)
Btw, if you want to keep your post-count at 777, you'll need to check back once in a while to make sure that it hasn't changed.  Occasionally an old thread will get deleted, and it can drop people's post counts by a few.  Notably, one forum member left after post 6666, and then returned a long time later to make a few more posts to get their number back again.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on January 30, 2012, 05:10:50 PM
Lewis XVI and Clark XV are hand delivering the bid from the Northwest territory.  Sacagawea XVII just delivered a message that the expedition is somewhere in the Snake River valley.  As long as P-Phil cooperates, the bid should arrive in time.

Just received word that the NW bid was last seen in the hands of a Postman on horseback riding across the Open Range muttering, "I will come.  I will come."  Rumor Has It the Postman was possibly in Dyersville, IA, after we received a Message in a Bottle Thirteen Days ago.  Unsubstantiated claims come from MN where his Bodyguard was seen Dancing with Wolves' Kevin Love and Ricky Rubio.  For Love of the Game, we hope the NW bid arrives in time to provide a Swing Vote for the bidding if necessary.

Sincerely,
Mr. Brooks, legal counsel for Clark XV
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: COUNTER_SNIPER on February 01, 2012, 03:24:52 AM
(My final post. It's been good, I'm hardly known, but unless I'm allowed to make a new account, this is the last you'll hear from me! Post-wise anyway...)
Btw, if you want to keep your post-count at 777, you'll need to check back once in a while to make sure that it hasn't changed.  Occasionally an old thread will get deleted, and it can drop people's post counts by a few.  Notably, one forum member left after post 6666, and then returned a long time later to make a few more posts to get their number back again.

You're right, it happened already even though my post count stayed steady for quite a few months before... Conspiracy? o_O

Back on-topic: I'll wait until you get closer to FL.  I would have to do exceptionally well in a category for the year to even consider an extended trip. 
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Lampy 2.0 on February 10, 2012, 03:02:48 PM
Personally (as you can tell in my signature), I want to have it in Atlanta. But I am so satisfied with Knoxville! I have family that lives near there so I could probably go to that. (And if either of those places becomes the selected spot, it will be my first Nationals ever!)

AmDrag
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 02:09:34 PM
My understanding of the situation with Nats, having had a discussion with Rob about it this weekend, is that there's only one more potential hurdle preventing a TN Nats this year, which is that the venue that the TN Nats would be at does not have showers. A couple other places in the area have portable showers, so they're trying to establish whether they can use them or not. If they can't, the Nats bid will likely go somewhere else, with a Rochester Nats being run by Roy, John, and Randall being the frontrunner.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 02:38:29 PM
Showers? I thought that's what hotels were for. We can't use private residence showers?

If that's the reason that the Northeast gets their second Nats in three years, then I think we need a better Nats selection process, beginning with a detailed checklist of what is required. I think some bids do not include information that may have swayed the judge, simply because they did not realize that it mattered. At the very least, hosts would know what they need to get covered before wasting time trying to find a venue. I was thinking of holding a Nats someday at Disney. But, oops, forget that. They don't have public showers. Oh well.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 02:43:34 PM
Not everyone will be staying in a hotel, I'm assuming that the TEN location was planning on providing at least some form of lodging but that lodging doesn't have showers.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 02:46:41 PM
Not everyone will be staying in a hotel, I'm assuming that the TEN location was planning on providing at least some form of lodging but that lodging doesn't have showers.

But if the "lodging" doesn't have showers, couldn't we use private residence showers? I'm sure the guys in TN were just trying to provide free (or really cheap) lodging. Not all churches in the country are big enough to have showers.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 02:50:45 PM
Not everyone will be staying in a hotel, I'm assuming that the TEN location was planning on providing at least some form of lodging but that lodging doesn't have showers.

But if the "lodging" doesn't have showers, couldn't we use private residence showers? I'm sure the guys in TN were just trying to provide free (or really cheap) lodging. Not all churches in the country are big enough to have showers.

You want the hosts to volunteer to have a hundred or so people use there shower? Let's think about this practically. Even if there's 3 hosts that's 33 people using there showers for the weekend, their water bills are going to hurt, not to mention having to clean up after everyone, because unfortunately you can't trust EVERYONE to do that themselves, obvious privacy concerns, plus the hassel of transporting these people for the venue to the residence and back and keeping all of that organized. That is a nightmare. I'm assuming if you put in a bid for disney you could also make a deal to use some of their abundant lodging, which does have public showers, problem solved.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 02:52:28 PM
I'm assuming if you put in a bid for disney you could also make a deal to use some of their abundant lodging, which does have public showers, problem solved.

And, likewise, people could pay for lodging in TN, which have showers. Problem solved.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 12, 2012, 02:54:08 PM
If showers determine the location of nationals I will be quite angry seeing as people could pay for a flippin hotel. Or they could set up a portable alternititve. Other CCGs' national tournament locations aren't determined by showers.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 02:56:07 PM
If showers determine the location of nationals I will be quite angry seeing as people could pay for a flippin hotel.

A flipping hotel? They have those in TN? I would think that would be a great tourist attraction! Be sure to include that on the application for Nats.  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 02:56:32 PM
I'm assuming if you put in a bid for disney you could also make a deal to use some of their abundant lodging, which does have public showers, problem solved.

And, likewise, people could pay for lodging in TN, which have showers. Problem solved.
not everyone can afford to pay for lodging after paying to get to TN and paying for the tournament itself. So if you want people to show up, an alternate form of lodging ca be provided.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on February 12, 2012, 02:56:40 PM
I think we can rule out College Station.  :P
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: TheHobbit13 on February 12, 2012, 02:59:09 PM
At Kansas City Nationals there was no option to stay at the church so I see no reason why they couldn't do the same thing in Tennessee. Either ways its okay cuz BO and Turtle go well together.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 03:01:26 PM
not everyone can afford to pay for lodging after paying to get to TN and paying for the tournament itself. So if you want people to show up, an alternate form of lodging ca be provided.

So then it's not about showers, but the extra cost of people travelling to have to stay in a hotel instead of get a free ride in the church. Why didn't you say that in the first place?

At Kansas City Nationals there was no option to stay at the church so I see no reason why they couldn't do the same thing in Tennessee. Either ways its okay cuz BO and Turtle go well together.

Thank you for your input, seeing as you have experience at several venues. That helps put things in perspective.  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: goldencomet on February 12, 2012, 03:04:24 PM
Has Texas been bid for yet?

We're in the middle of everyone so it makes the most sense ^.^
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 12, 2012, 03:04:47 PM
At Kansas City Nationals there was no option to stay at the church so I see no reason why they couldn't do the same thing in Tennessee. Either ways its okay cuz BO and Turtle go well together.
I'm also going to chime in that that was the second largest nationals of ALL TIME. And no one could stay at the church.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 03:06:39 PM
And how did the venue smell at the end of the weekend? Did it need to be fumigated after the tournament before it could be used again?

Sure you could just make everyone get a hotel, but not everyone can pay for a hotel. Attendance goes down.
Portable option? Expensive. Might make it so the hosts can't afford the tournament anymore.
Hosts sharing their showers? Also expensive for the hosts, impractical and an organizational nightmare.

In the end it will be the decision of Rob and the hosts. Maybe it's not so much that TN doesn't have showers but that other possible venues do and this is, after all, a competition for who is best equipped to host the tournament. No matter what, it is Rob's decision and his decision will be what is best for the tournament 

So then it's not about showers, but the extra cost of people travelling to have to stay in a hotel instead of get a free ride in the church. Why didn't you say that in the first place?

It's about both. Showers aren't being provided, which would force people to get hotels, which they may not be able to afford, decreasing attendance and leading to a less successful nats.

If showers determine the location of nationals I will be quite angry seeing as people could pay for a flippin hotel. Or they could set up a portable alternititve. Other CCGs' national tournament locations aren't determined by showers.

I'm assuming by "other CCG's" you mean Magic and YuGiOh. You're comparing apples to oranges. Redemption nats, at best, will probably not top more then a few hundred people. The worst grand prix for magic will still draw a few thousand. You can try to accommodate a few hundred, a few thousand is impossible.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on February 12, 2012, 03:15:20 PM
You don't need showers. Just use a hose. If there isn't a hose at the church or water is too expensive, use a bucket and a public water fountain. That's free.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 03:18:15 PM
Yes the water is free, but indecent exposure is a crime.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 03:20:20 PM
Those who are expressing outrage at the idea of showers possibly preventing a TN Nats, actually use some reason here. 150-200 people would attend a TN Nats; it's a central location that's not too far from most people (CA doesn't count, as noted on COUNTER_SNIPER's map), and seems agreeable with everyone. It has a high probability of being a highly-attended Nats. My understanding is that lodging can be provided at the church, which is why the showers are an issue. It's simply unreasonable to make everyone use hotels, especially when there's another option. Frankly, that's an additional $40-50 for most people minimum, and not everyone can afford that - it will keep some people - even just a handful - from attending, so it's an important issue. Even suggesting that people in the Knoxville area should be willing to open their showers for a bunch of people, many of them strangers, is just rude.

If showers determine the location of nationals I will be quite angry seeing as people could pay for a flippin hotel. Or they could set up a portable alternititve. Other CCGs' national tournament locations aren't determined by showers.

Your tears are delicious.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 12, 2012, 03:25:27 PM
I will boycott nationals if it's not in TN because of that. Let's look at past nationals.
2011: MN. The luxury of the redemption card kingdom. We get hundreds of people, have places to stay and plenty of people to get them from the airport. Nowhere else has what MN has.
2010: MA. No lodging provided. Better get a hotel. John Michalyzyn was running everywhere with his few helpers trying to get people.
2009: CA. I wasn't there, but I don't think lodging was provided.
2008: OH. It was in a hotel.
2007: KS. I don't remember, but lodging wasn't provided.
2006: NY. I don't remember, but lodging was provided. I'm not sure if you had to pay though.
2005: MN. I don't remember, but I don't think lodging was provided. I distinctly remember staying at a hotel.

So far: Showers: 2 (people from where nats would be held otherwise, mind you, 1 of whom hasn't attended a nats). TN: 5 (none of which are from TN, though 2 of whom won't be at nats, 3 of them have been to nats)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 03:27:28 PM
Perhaps the powers-at-be will see this and take it into account, or I may have just misinterpreted how large of an issue this is in determining a TN Nats. Rob said we should get a definite verdict in a week or two.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 03:31:16 PM
I will boycott nationals if it's not in TN because of that. Let's look at past nationals.

No you won't, but nice try.

Perhaps the years that places without showers were selected there was not an alternative with showers available. There is this year. In fact one of the alternatives has an airport less than 20 minutes away, lodging, showers, a dining hall a 2 second walk from the lodging (though I'm sure food is not free), pretty much everything you could want for a nats, INCLUDING and I just found this out, a Perkins less than 20 minutes. So Sauce might even show up.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 12, 2012, 03:38:41 PM
I still hold that declining a location a very-much deserved nationals over lack of showers is absurd.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 03:39:26 PM
Delicious.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 03:41:32 PM
I still hold that declining a location a very-much deserved nationals over lack of showers is absurd.

Talk to an event planner and see what they say. Seemingly little things like this can cause huge problems. Rob understands that.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 12, 2012, 03:52:22 PM
If TN doesn't get it the NE should not get it. Because of the fact that it had it in 2010.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 03:55:29 PM
The two main supporters for showers in the church are also from NY. Besides, your showers seem to be taken care of with other peoples' tears, so you have nothing to worry about.

This current debate seems to be more about NY arrogance than TN showers. Just because the NY group is the most prevalent on the Message Boards lately does not mean they deserve Nats. The Tournament Host Guide says that Cactus tries to spread the location of Nats throughout the country. A second Nats in the Northeast in three years does not meet that criteria.

...and this is, after all, a competition for who is best equipped to host the tournament.

This is where you are misguided. This is not a competition, otherwise MN would win every year. They have mattresses in the church for crying out loud.

Nats should be about keeping the game alive all across the country, not just in NY and MN. If Nats is never anywhere near entire regions of the country, then Redemption will systematically die in those regions.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 04:07:08 PM
The NE is the next most prepared to host. That plays in to it just as much, if not more, than the actual location. It'd be great if we could have nats rotate locations but the location doesn't matter if the location isn't prepared enough to host. You want as many people as possible to come, but you also want those people to have a good experience so they will come back.

The two main supporters for showers in the church are also from NY. Besides, your showers seem to be taken care of with other peoples' tears, so you have nothing to worry about.

This current debate seems to be more about NY arrogance than TN showers. Just because the NY group is the most prevalent on the Message Boards lately does not mean they deserve Nats. The Tournament Host Guide says that Cactus tries to spread the location of Nats throughout the country. A second Nats in the Northeast in three years does not meet that criteria.

...and this is, after all, a competition for who is best equipped to host the tournament.

This is where you are misguided. This is not a competition, otherwise MN would win every year. They have mattresses in the church for crying out loud.

Nats should be about keeping the game alive all across the country, not just in NY and MN. If Nats is never anywhere near entire regions of the country, then Redemption will systematically die in those regions.


The ways in which you are wrong..let me count them.

1) Chronic is from PA, not NY.

2) I actually was going to comment on Chronic's repeatedly stating this, as it seems rude and uncalled for, but since Red wasn't responding I was assuming it's an inside joke. The replies do not represent the views of anyone but Chronic.

3) I wasn't aware that I was being arrogant for defending the potential decision of Rob Anderson, who knows better than any of us how nats needs to be planned. I can only hope you aren't letting your personal opinion of me reflect on NY's supposed "arrogance".

4) Me..Randall...occasionally Irish_Luck and Katedid. You're right we are totally the most prevelant we have 4 active members on a site with well over a thousand members.

5) Distant between Rochester NY - Boston MA 302 402 miles. Distance from Rochester MN to Nashville TN 760 miles. We may be in the same region as boston, but we aren't exactly close. You're putting more weight on region then on actual distance.

6) Rochester's bid is a college, complete with dorms, dining hall, a gym, soccer fields etc.

7) Gross exaggeration is hyperbolic.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 04:07:32 PM
The two main supporters for showers in the church are also from NY. Besides, your showers seem to be taken care of with other peoples' tears, so you have nothing to worry about.

This current debate seems to be more about NY arrogance than TN showers. Just because the NY group is the most prevalent on the Message Boards lately does not mean they deserve Nats. The Tournament Host Guide says that Cactus tries to spread the location of Nats throughout the country. A second Nats in the Northeast in three years does not meet that criteria.

I'm not from New York, so if you're referring to me, please fact-check before making assumptions. TN is only three hours extra from me than Rochester is, and I have no problem with that (either one is a huge improvement over the one-way 24 hour drive MN was last year). Make no mistake, I'm completely and totally pulling for a Knoxville Nats this year, since I agree with everyone else that they deserve it the most, and as I mentioned, there's a small amount of extra travel time for me involved. Regardless of this "New York arrogance" you're talking about, the issue of showers is a big one. The fact of the matter is Rochester is an attractive location, and when it comes down to it, either location would have a large amount of people, and if one location can offer lodging without the need for hotels to shower and one can't, logistically, the location that can offer lodging without need for hotels should win. As you noted, however, logistics aren't the only issue, or MN would win every time; semantics are important as well.

Nats should be about keeping the game alive all across the country, not just in NY and MN. If Nats is never anywhere near entire regions of the country, then Redemption will systematically die in those regions.

Which of course, explains why Florida and California don't have any active playgroups.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 12, 2012, 04:08:25 PM
Hi.  I'm Randall Koutnik.  I'm one of the frontrunners for hosting Nats.  I'm 21, 5" 10', and have eyes that are blue most of the time.  My dream since I started playing Redemption has been to host Nationals.  Sure, winning Nats would be nice, but I've always loved hosting and helping others enjoy themselves far more than winning.  I've made lots of friends through this game, and I hope to make many more.  As far as I know, I would be the youngest to host Nationals if I win this year's bid.  I would be co-hosting with two good friends and wise men (not to mention former hosts), John M and Reyzen.

This is not about arrogance, and it hurts me when it is framed this way.  TN is the rightful leader, and I hope they get it, as they deserve it more than I.  However, this is Rob's decision.  It is not mine, or anyone else who's been arguing for the past few pages.  Please end this pointless bickering, and let's enjoy a fun, Christ-centered National Tournament, wherever it is held.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: katedid on February 12, 2012, 04:17:54 PM

This current debate seems to be more about NY arrogance than TN showers.


I am somewhat offended by this broad generalization. What exactly has given you the impression that we NY players are arrogant? Are you by any chance operating under the assumption that all New Yorker's are from  New York City, which in itself is another terrible stereotype?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 12, 2012, 04:22:08 PM
I'm gonna say that I wasn't responding to chronic because otherwise I'd not respond kindly...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 04:23:52 PM
I'm gonna say that I wasn't responding to chronic because otherwise I'd not respond kindly...

So not an inside joke. Got it.


Chronic, I've kind of been holding this in for awhile but check your PMs, We need to talk.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: goldencomet on February 12, 2012, 04:38:44 PM
I think I speak for the Texans when I say that we've never hosted Nats there. And most of us are too modest to say so, so I'll speak up for us and say that no, we are not arrogant, and yes, we do have showers (I have no idea what places you other people live in that don't have showers but I find that rather odd).

So come over and enjoy Nats at a place that, you'll be surprised to find, is not over populated with cowboys :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 12, 2012, 04:44:05 PM
goldencomet, a place could be perfect to host nats, but if there's no will, there's no way.  Texas would need a host as well as a location.  As far as I know, no one in TX has placed a bid.  As much fun as Texas is (you guys have the second best barbeque ever), I don't think Nats will be there.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 04:56:57 PM
1) Chronic is from PA, not NY.

I was indeed wrong. I thought you, CA and SomeKittens were all part of the same playgroup.

2) I actually was going to comment on Chronic's repeatedly stating this, as it seems rude and uncalled for, but since Red wasn't responding I was assuming it's an inside joke. The replies do not represent the views of anyone but Chronic.

I'll let you handle that, then. I interpreted the same as you did.


3) I wasn't aware that I was being arrogant for defending the potential decision of Rob Anderson, who knows better than any of us how nats needs to be planned. I can only hope you aren't letting your personal opinion of me reflect on NY's supposed "arrogance".

This is where I will assume full responsibility for the misunderstanding, since SK and Kate had the same reponse. I meant that the idea NY was better because of showers, dorms, etc. seemed arrogant - kind of a "we have what they don't" approach. To me, that was an indictment of the less priviledged, which I termed as "arrogant." Perhaps "elitist" was more what I was thinking, but I'm sure that would have been met with the same rebuttal.

So, I apologize to New Yorkers in general, since I was referring only to the NY bid, not the people individually.

4) Me..Randall...occasionally Irish_Luck and Katedid. You're right we are totally the most prevelant we have 4 active members on a site with well over a thousand members.

There are not nearly a thousand active Board Members, and significantly less that post on a regular basis. My point was that activity on the boards should not be a deciding factor for Nats since there are many players who are not on the boards at all.

5) Distant between Rochester NY - Boston MA 302 402 miles. Distance from Rochester MN to Nashville TN 760 miles. We may be in the same region as boston, but we aren't exactly close. You're putting more weight on region then on actual distance.

Yes. I was talking specifically about regions. I had tried to italicize the word so as to clarify my position.

6) Rochester's bid is a college, complete with dorms, dining hall, a gym, soccer fields etc.

Back to my ill-worded post, I was viewing this as a "we got all this and TN doesn't" approach, which is what I was decrying. However, I should not have said "arrogant" and I should have been more specific the first time.

7) Gross exaggeration is hyperbolic.

I like being gross.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 05:01:48 PM
I think I speak for the Texans when I say that we've never hosted Nats there. And most of us are too modest to say so, so I'll speak up for us and say that no, we are not arrogant, and yes, we do have showers (I have no idea what places you other people live in that don't have showers but I find that rather odd).

So come over and enjoy Nats at a place that, you'll be surprised to find, is not over populated with cowboys :D

If I recall correctly, Rob did mention Texas in his list of Nats frontrunners, so don't give up hope yet. There's always a chance that if TN or NY works out this year, that you guys in TX can put together a strong proposal next year. :)

Regarding my comment to Red, I apologize, I didn't intend it to come off as it apparently did, and since this seems to be a recurring theme for me, I'll be much more conscientious of what I type in the future. That said, I still disagree with the notion that the discussion of the importance of showers is "absurd." I have absolutely no interest in spending four days with a bunch of people, half of whom haven't showered throughout that time. Having to pay for a hotel may be the difference in me going or not going depending on the prices of decent places in the area. Disregarding the importance of the issue is unwise, in my opinion.

Quote
I was indeed wrong. I thought you, CA and SomeKittens were all part of the same playgroup.

Nope. Randall and I have been known to pal around, but I live six hours away from the Rochester playgroup.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 05:05:03 PM
I'm not necassarily trying to say that we are better than TN because we have all of this stuff, just that when it comes down to it if showers are a problem it's one that others don't have making them just as attractive as a location. When doing even planning the minute details are often backbreakers. In the cases of the years nats didnt even have lodging this actual eliminates the need to worry about showers since everyone coming would be getting lodging elsewhere and the hosts didn't need to worry about the conditions of that lodging. When you provide lodging it opens up a whole new aspect of things that you have to provide, such as sanitary conditions.

I'm also not really a member of Randall's playgroup anymore as I don't really play the game. Though when speaking of the Rochester play group I am geographically included since I would be volunteering to help out if Nats is indeed here.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 12, 2012, 05:07:07 PM
Let's remember several things:
-We're not Rob.  None of the discussion here will be taken into consideration for the bid.
-Most of you haven't read the bids, so let's not criticize them.
-Apologies are good, but let's keep it cool.  I will lock this if it gets worse.

One thing I'd like to point out:
3) I wasn't aware that I was being arrogant for defending the potential decision of Rob Anderson, who knows better than any of us how nats needs to be planned. I can only hope you aren't letting your personal opinion of me reflect on NY's supposed "arrogance".

This is where I will assume full responsibility for the misunderstanding, since SK and Kate had the same reponse. I meant that the idea NY was better because of showers, dorms, etc. seemed arrogant - kind of a "we have what they don't" approach. To me, that was an indictment of the less priviledged, which I termed as "arrogant." Perhaps "elitist" was more what I was thinking, but I'm sure that would have been met with the same rebuttal.

So, I apologize to New Yorkers in general, since I was referring only to the NY bid, not the people individually.

As the author of the NY bid, it never once mentioned TN or any other location.  It simply listed the reasons why Rob should choose NY as the location for Nats 2012.  I'm sure every other Nats bid does the same.  Please keep this in mind in your future posts.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 05:10:02 PM
-We're not Rob.  None of the discussion here will be taken into consideration for the bid.

Do you actually know this for a fact? I know that Rob actually listens to a lot of the member input when looking at Nats bids, even indirectly. I'm sure a bunch of people yelling that they'll boycott Nats if it's not at TN due to the shower issue won't go unheeded.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 05:16:09 PM
If Rob is considering saying no to TN because of this I don't think what we say will change him mind. There is an angle of this that no one has yet considered, Having several hundred people crammed in to a single location without means of sanitation for days can easily be considered a health hazard and get Nats shut down.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 12, 2012, 05:32:12 PM
As the author of the NY bid, it never once mentioned TN or any other location.  It simply listed the reasons why Rob should choose NY as the location for Nats 2012.  I'm sure every other Nats bid does the same.  Please keep this in mind in your future posts.

Again, even "NY bid" is not entirely what I meant, but rather "the arguments for why NY was better than TN is the posts preceeding my post." I have nothing against NY having a bid. In fact, I would fully support NY for Nats 2013, especially in dorms.

My beef is with the lack of regional representation. Even if MN had tried to downplay TN's bid in favor of their superior facilities, I would have spoken out, much like I did years back with the CA bid. I think that every region deserves a Nats, even if it means in less than superior venues.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 05:32:48 PM
If Rob is considering saying no to TN because of this I don't think what we say will change him mind.

Call me naive, but I think it will.

Quote
There is an angle of this that no one has yet considered, Having several hundred people crammed in to a single location without means of sanitation for days can easily be considered a health hazard and get Nats shut down.

Not a chance. Enough people would want showers and stay in hotels, and even if not, four days with 200 people is nothing.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 05:35:14 PM
If Rob is considering saying no to TN because of this I don't think what we say will change him mind.

Call me naive, but I think it will.

Quote
There is an angle of this that no one has yet considered, Having several hundred people crammed in to a single location without means of sanitation for days can easily be considered a health hazard and get Nats shut down.

Not a chance. Enough people would want showers and stay in hotels, and even if not, four days with 200 people is nothing.

You really don't think a health organization would see 200 people sleeping in the same location with no showers for 3-4 days as a health issue? Even to me it sounds like a breeding ground for disease.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 12, 2012, 05:54:19 PM
-We're not Rob.  None of the discussion here will be taken into consideration for the bid.

Do you actually know this for a fact? I know that Rob actually listens to a lot of the member input when looking at Nats bids, even indirectly. I'm sure a bunch of people yelling that they'll boycott Nats if it's not at TN due to the shower issue won't go unheeded.
Heh.  Just goes to show I'm not Rob.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 12, 2012, 06:05:23 PM
1) Chronic is from PA, not NY.

4) Me..Randall...occasionally Irish_Luck and Katedid. You're right we are totally the most prevelant we have 4 active members on a site with well over a thousand members.
be in the same region as boston, but we aren't exactly close. You're putting more weight on region then on actual distance.
1. I made this mistake as well. I tend to lump most people from the NE together, just like most people lump all minnesotans together, even though we aren't in the same playgroup.

4. Despite what it seems, looking at the past 3 pages, you five (including Chronic) have the majority by far. You, Skittens, and CA are the most active group from a concentrated area. Less you in terms of Redemption though. I would say the NE is definitely the most vocal on the boards. NC has more members, but we (well, everybody besides me) tend to comment on concrete things, not the debatable ones.

I will boycott nationals if it's not in TN because of that. Let's look at past nationals.

No you won't, but nice try.
Actually, I will. I realize this won't (or shouldn't) change Rob's mind, but if that's the way he's going to choose, that's the way I'm going to choose. This also plays with the fact that I won't have much money in the upcoming years, but depending on locations, I would definitely make an effort every year (except CA) otherwise.

Also, I'm not sure why people are throwing around the number 200. We'll be lucky if there's 125 people at nats this year.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 06:08:12 PM
I was saying you won't because you still have to try and make me wear a Tebow jersey.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 06:25:18 PM
You really don't think a health organization would see 200 people sleeping in the same location with no showers for 3-4 days as a health issue? Even to me it sounds like a breeding ground for disease.

No I don't. Again, you have to assume that at least 1/4 of the people at Nats either live in the area or are getting hotels, which means that, if we assume 200 people (Ring Wraith, I use 200 as an absolute maximum, if the stars aligned perfectly), 50 people are going to be showered. 150 people in a four day period isn't going to cause any kind of a health hazard, because the facilities themselves will be clean. Even if they did see it as an issue, by the time they could actually organize any kind of investigation, Nats would already be wrapping up.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 06:48:43 PM
Health department doesn't do an investigation then shut you down, they shut you down then investigate. And even if they did wait until after Nats to do the investigation the tournament hosts and cactus could still get fined after the fact.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on February 12, 2012, 07:15:16 PM
I'll boycott nats if it isn't in TN, too! Power to the people!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 07:18:35 PM
Health department doesn't do an investigation then shut you down, they shut you down then investigate. And even if they did wait until after Nats to do the investigation the tournament hosts and cactus could still get fined after the fact.

You're severely overestimating what 150 people not showering for four days would do. As long as people were generally clean (washing hands before meals and after using the bathroom, using deodorant, etc), it wouldn't be that big of an issue.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on February 12, 2012, 07:23:25 PM
Chronic, have you seen Contagion?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 12, 2012, 07:24:42 PM
i think you're underestimating it. have you seen randall's suite? that's 10 guys and they can destroy that place in 2 days. Now multiply that out to 150+ people, take away their showers, and consider that they are all sharing a limited number of bathrooms and it could get ugly fast. 
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: EmJayBee83 on February 12, 2012, 07:40:11 PM
I am so happy that Gabe's Church in Iowa has showers.

That is going to be sweet location for next year.



Yeah, yeah... I know I need to put out the rules for T2 TEAMS.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 12, 2012, 08:15:40 PM
i think you're underestimating it. have you seen randall's suite? that's 10 guys and they can destroy that place in 2 days. Now multiply that out to 150+ people, take away their showers, and consider that they are all sharing a limited number of bathrooms and it could get ugly fast.

Again, you're assuming that measures wouldn't be taken to compensate for the lack of showers. If everyone does their best to remain clean as possible otherwise, there's no issue. Just because ten unchecked college students rip apart a dorm room in a couple days doesn't mean that 150 people, many of them adults, would cause a problem.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: goldencomet on February 12, 2012, 08:36:03 PM
Okay, I don't remember Boston Nats being anything like this at all...
From what I can remember most people stayed in hotels, and everybody had showers.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 12, 2012, 09:23:14 PM
Yeah, every nats except MN 90% of people have stayed at hotels, and I'm assuming 100% took showers.

Personally, I plan on drenching myself in body spray to overpower the BO around me. Either that or devising a way to have terrible allergies.   :D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Lawman on February 13, 2012, 12:24:41 AM
The two main supporters for showers in the church are also from NY. Besides, your showers seem to be taken care of with other peoples' tears, so you have nothing to worry about.

This current debate seems to be more about NY arrogance than TN showers. Just because the NY group is the most prevalent on the Message Boards lately does not mean they deserve Nats. The Tournament Host Guide says that Cactus tries to spread the location of Nats throughout the country. A second Nats in the Northeast in three years does not meet that criteria.

I'm not from New York, so if you're referring to me, please fact-check before making assumptions. TN is only three hours extra from me than Rochester is, and I have no problem with that (either one is a huge improvement over the one-way 24 hour drive MN was last year). Make no mistake, I'm completely and totally pulling for a Knoxville Nats this year, since I agree with everyone else that they deserve it the most, and as I mentioned, there's a small amount of extra travel time for me involved. Regardless of this "New York arrogance" you're talking about, the issue of showers is a big one. The fact of the matter is Rochester is an attractive location, and when it comes down to it, either location would have a large amount of people, and if one location can offer lodging without the need for hotels to shower and one can't, logistically, the location that can offer lodging without need for hotels should win. As you noted, however, logistics aren't the only issue, or MN would win every time; semantics are important as well.

Nats should be about keeping the game alive all across the country, not just in NY and MN. If Nats is never anywhere near entire regions of the country, then Redemption will systematically die in those regions.

Which of course, explains why Florida and California doesn't have any active playgroups.

FL has 3 active playgroups.  I believe you have fallen victim to the same "error" of failing to "Fact-check" before assuming as YMT.  I don't know much about Cali's situation as there may be at least 1 playgroup there but I know FL has 3.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 13, 2012, 12:27:37 AM
I think the last part was sarcastic, we're all aware that Florida least has a fairly large play group, a couple of them infact. He was disputing YMT saying that if a region doesn't get a Nats the play groups will die by sarcastically pointing out that those states have active playgroups despite not having had nats in their region in awhile
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Lawman on February 13, 2012, 12:50:26 AM
I think the last part was sarcastic, we're all aware that Florida least has a fairly large play group, a couple of them infact. He was disputing YMT saying that if a region doesn't get a Nats the play groups will die by sarcastically pointing out that those states have active playgroups despite not having had nats in their region in awhile

Well it was in bad taste and ill-timed. 
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: katedid on February 13, 2012, 12:51:36 AM
Dudes, Please shower....at least for the ladies sake  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Lawman on February 13, 2012, 12:56:28 AM
If I were going to Nats and TN was not picked due to the showers, I wouldn't shower for 4 days prior as some sort of "strike" or "protest."  (and I'd go the next 4 days without showering as well 8)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 13, 2012, 09:50:41 AM
I think the last part was sarcastic, we're all aware that Florida least has a fairly large play group, a couple of them infact. He was disputing YMT saying that if a region doesn't get a Nats the play groups will die by sarcastically pointing out that those states have active playgroups despite not having had nats in their region in awhile

Well it was in bad taste and ill-timed.

I apologize if you took offense, but I'm not really sure why that would upset you at all. It's well-known that Florida has a few thriving playgroups, despite being relatively isolated from the rest of the Redemption community because they never make it to Nats, leading to an unorthodox meta in at least one of the playgroups. YMT is one of the most prominent members on the forum, and Knot a Blonde (along with yourself, apparently) both also tend to post a lot. I'm not sure why this is, but Florida players seem to jump to the defense of their state at the slightest provocation, and I've never figured out why that is. California has at least one large playgroup, and it includes the member that many people would call the foremost authority on Redemption (Bryon). So again, I apologize, but don't be so quick to needlessly defend FL in the future; nobody actually looks down on you guys at all.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Mr.Hiatus on February 13, 2012, 11:36:21 AM
I am not sure why all this shower talk is going on for TN...Chris and I are taking care of everything.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on February 13, 2012, 11:39:04 AM
If I were going to Nats and TN was not picked due to the showers, I wouldn't shower for 4 days prior as some sort of "strike" or "protest."  (and I'd go the next 4 days without showering as well 8)

In addition, support your local Salvation Army by buying some often-used, thread-bare clothes complete with fingertip-less gloves for the perfect ensemble.  ;)

As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 13, 2012, 11:40:43 AM
If I were going to Nats and TN was not picked due to the showers, I wouldn't shower for 4 days prior as some sort of "strike" or "protest."  (and I'd go the next 4 days without showering as well 8)

In addition, support your local Salvation Army by buying some often-used, thread-bare clothes complete with fingertip-less gloves for the perfect ensemble.  ;)

As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D

Will you allow her to attend knowing that this will put her on the same campus as I for 3 years?  :laugh:
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on February 13, 2012, 11:45:04 AM
If I were going to Nats and TN was not picked due to the showers, I wouldn't shower for 4 days prior as some sort of "strike" or "protest."  (and I'd go the next 4 days without showering as well 8)

In addition, support your local Salvation Army by buying some often-used, thread-bare clothes complete with fingertip-less gloves for the perfect ensemble.  ;)

As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D

Will you allow her to attend knowing that this will put her on the same campus as I for 3 years?  :laugh:

Absolutely!  I already told you I was looking forward to meeting you one day.  :)   Do you know ASL?  She will primarily be hanging out with the deaf and hard-of-hearing.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 13, 2012, 11:46:22 AM
If I were going to Nats and TN was not picked due to the showers, I wouldn't shower for 4 days prior as some sort of "strike" or "protest."  (and I'd go the next 4 days without showering as well 8)

In addition, support your local Salvation Army by buying some often-used, thread-bare clothes complete with fingertip-less gloves for the perfect ensemble.  ;)

As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D

Will you allow her to attend knowing that this will put her on the same campus as I for 3 years?  :laugh:

Absolutely!  I already told you I was looking forward to meeting you one day.  :)   Do you know ASL?  She will primarily be hanging out with the deaf and hard-of-hearing.

I know a few signs but do not really know it. That is on my list of languages to learn, right after Russian  ;D maybe I should move it up haha
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Professoralstad on February 13, 2012, 11:50:39 AM
I am not sure why all this shower talk is going on for TN...Chris and I are taking care of everything.

Glad this was brought up by a first hand source. I fully trust that if TN is the location, that there will be suitable accommodations for all.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on February 13, 2012, 11:53:33 AM
I am not sure why all this shower talk is going on for TN...Chris and I are taking care of everything.

Glad this was brought up by a first hand source. I fully trust that if TN is the location, that there will be suitable accommodations for all.

If not, just have daily baptisms down at the river.  ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: soul seeker on February 13, 2012, 12:58:30 PM
Someone that I have kept updated about Nats location had a question for me that I thought I would pass along.....

"Why is there a big argument about showers? Everyone knows CCG players don't shower at tournaments.  So what do CCG players need showers for?"


 :rollin:

* deep breath *

 :rollin:
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 13, 2012, 01:01:30 PM
Someone that I have kept updated about Nats location had a question for me that I thought I would pass along.....

"Why is there a big argument about showers? Everyone knows CCG players don't shower at tournaments.  So what do CCG players need showers for?"


 :rollin:

* deep breath *

 :rollin:

I would have showered at NE regionals if they had them available and that was only a 2 day tourney  ::)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 13, 2012, 01:27:43 PM
As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D
We should be ready to take it in 2014.

Okay, okay, I'll stop with the Rochester jokes...
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 13, 2012, 01:31:19 PM
As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D
We should be ready to take it in 2014.

Okay, okay, I'll stop with the Rochester jokes...

My Rochester could beat up your Rochester  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 13, 2012, 01:32:04 PM
I am not sure why all this shower talk is going on for TN...Chris and I are taking care of everything.

Glad this was brought up by a first hand source. I fully trust that if TN is the location, that there will be suitable accommodations for all.

If not, just have daily baptisms down at the river.  ;)
When did lp convert? ;)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 13, 2012, 01:43:22 PM
As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D
Why not Roberts?  What's her major?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on February 13, 2012, 02:23:49 PM
As for Nats in Rochester, PLEASE wait a couple more years.  I just found out my daughter has decided to attend RIT in Rochester.  In fact, I vote Nats in Rochester from 2013-2016.  ;D
Why not Roberts?  What's her major?

She was born deaf.  She uses a cochlear implant that makes her hard-of-hearing.  She chose RIT over Gallaudet because her deaf and hard-of-hearing friends go to RIT.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Lawman on February 13, 2012, 07:41:09 PM
I think the last part was sarcastic, we're all aware that Florida least has a fairly large play group, a couple of them infact. He was disputing YMT saying that if a region doesn't get a Nats the play groups will die by sarcastically pointing out that those states have active playgroups despite not having had nats in their region in awhile

Well it was in bad taste and ill-timed.

I apologize if you took offense, but I'm not really sure why that would upset you at all. It's well-known that Florida has a few thriving playgroups, despite being relatively isolated from the rest of the Redemption community because they never make it to Nats, leading to an unorthodox meta in at least one of the playgroups. YMT is one of the most prominent members on the forum, and Knot a Blonde (along with yourself, apparently) both also tend to post a lot. I'm not sure why this is, but Florida players seem to jump to the defense of their state at the slightest provocation, and I've never figured out why that is. California has at least one large playgroup, and it includes the member that many people would call the foremost authority on Redemption (Bryon). So again, I apologize, but don't be so quick to needlessly defend FL in the future; nobody actually looks down on you guys at all.

1.  Looks at post count.

2.  I never understood why a Mouse was chosen as Mayor of our State Capitol.  :o
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Tom Bombadil on February 13, 2012, 08:57:45 PM
ROCHESTER, NY FOR THE WIN!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cincyoldguy on February 15, 2012, 02:46:58 PM
I have followed all the discussions on location and want to throw in my 2and 1/2 cents. Rebeccah and I had the real pleasure of having Chris and Hiatus in our car for the trip to MN Nationals last year. They clearly wanted to present a compelling bid for Knoxville and discussed it alot on the way. They are truly quality guys who are very real and sincere advocates for the game and its growth/message. R. and I are positive they would do everything possible to make it a successful tournament which includes strong consideration for comfort, access, price and Christian fellowship. What more do we require! R. and I will attend wherever it is as she wants to try to defend her Sealed Deck title from MN Nats. but would consider it even more enjoyable to beat Chris and Hiatus on their "own" turf. We both vote for TN. PS: And I have no problem continuing to be an easy win for the MN/NY contingents. Allen
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Ironica on February 16, 2012, 12:21:57 AM
Us Cali's are sure feeling the love here :p. In case you're wondering, I do have a decent size group. Problem is, Ionesco of them can drive (so they all have to rely on parents). I'm just hoping that Cali will have another nats before my six year old graduates high school :p
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Deck Metrics on February 19, 2012, 09:48:24 AM
all this talk about no showers...simple solution....Baby wipes!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: disciple_drew on February 19, 2012, 10:15:11 AM
Very true, although not as comfortable as it may seem... it gets the job done.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Red on February 19, 2012, 11:07:13 PM
I'll vouch for that. Baby wipes got me though a spell of no power.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Tom Bombadil on February 19, 2012, 11:58:14 PM
So I have a question, when would we find out for sure where Nats is?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 20, 2012, 12:02:56 AM
When Rob makes a final announcement, which is entirely on his schedule.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on February 20, 2012, 01:15:05 AM
Rob said it should be within a couple weeks, and that was a week ago, so hopefully sometime this coming week.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on February 20, 2012, 03:05:33 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: lp670sv on February 20, 2012, 03:31:45 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 20, 2012, 07:22:37 AM
Very true, although not as comfortable as it may seem... it gets the job done.
all this talk about no showers...simple solution....Baby wipes!

Whoa! Where did you guys come from? I haven't heard from you guys in a while. You used to call me all the time for ruling help. Did you get to a point where you no longer need my help, or just realize that I have no idea what I am talking about?  ;)

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.

There are never any guarantees until the official announcement, but even then it's not a guarantee if your last name is Favre.  :o
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on February 20, 2012, 09:51:35 AM


There are never any guarantees until the official announcement, but even then it's not a guarantee if your last name is Favre.  :o

true. ::)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Deck Metrics on February 20, 2012, 10:13:34 PM
Whoa! Where did you guys come from? I haven't heard from you guys in a while. You used to call me all the time for ruling help. Did you get to a point where you no longer need my help, or just realize that I have no idea what I am talking about?  ;)

Hey Tim! Yeah most of our group had other priorities. Two guys moved away, one for college, another for a job. One fellow got married and just reverted back to his War Hammer hobby.  Our tournament attendance kept shrinking so we decided to stop hosting tournaments until interest built up.  Better news, over the weekend four of us actually met with two guys from Fort Myers in Clewiston, FL. It went very well, we promoted your group and your wisdom & charm, lol.  They're interested in meeting up again and even trying to make States if it comes around. *hint hint  ;)  We also managed to teach 3 people at the McDonald's we met at and give them starters. Did you know there was a small play group in Ft. Myers?  They've been playing for years, longer than we have.  Honestly, I think the trip is what the group needed.  It's created a spark in all of us again, the mini road trip was well worth it.  They learned a few things too. 
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Prof Underwood on February 20, 2012, 11:24:25 PM
Our tournament attendance kept shrinking so we decided to stop hosting tournaments until interest built up...It's created a spark in all of us again, the mini road trip was well worth it.
Ahhh, the downs and ups of leading a playgroup.  I've been there too, and I'm glad to say that if you stick with it, things will come back around.  I've missed seeing you guys on the forum for the last 6 months, and hope that this new spark will last and that we'll see much more of you in the next 6 months.  Your heart for using this game for ministry is an inspiration, keep up the good work.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: COUNTER_SNIPER on February 21, 2012, 03:51:58 AM
Our tournament attendance kept shrinking so we decided to stop hosting tournaments until interest built up...It's created a spark in all of us again, the mini road trip was well worth it.
Ahhh, the downs and ups of leading a playgroup.  I've been there too, and I'm glad to say that if you stick with it, things will come back around.  I've missed seeing you guys on the forum for the last 6 months, and hope that this new spark will last and that we'll see much more of you in the next 6 months.  Your heart for using this game for ministry is an inspiration, keep up the good work.

It died down because I stopped playing so much.  ::)  And what do you know, I start playing again and interest picks up!  It's a conspiracy I say!  I might even be convinced to travel to Nationals... but it's too soon to tell.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: disciple_drew on February 21, 2012, 06:55:41 AM
Our tournament attendance kept shrinking so we decided to stop hosting tournaments until interest built up...It's created a spark in all of us again, the mini road trip was well worth it.
Ahhh, the downs and ups of leading a playgroup.  I've been there too, and I'm glad to say that if you stick with it, things will come back around.  I've missed seeing you guys on the forum for the last 6 months, and hope that this new spark will last and that we'll see much more of you in the next 6 months.  Your heart for using this game for ministry is an inspiration, keep up the good work

It died down because I stopped playing so much.  ::)  And what do you know, I start playing again and interest picks up!  It's a conspiracy I say!  I might even be convinced to travel to Nationals... but it's too soon to tell.

It's a conspiracy that you come back with your refried account cause of your jackpot post count. But we'll enjoy you playing again.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on February 23, 2012, 07:49:15 PM
At this Nats we should shave Gabe instead of Tim.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on February 24, 2012, 09:52:52 AM
At this Nats we should shave Gabe instead of Tim.
But then he'll lose his power!  We need him to trump RLKs so we don't have to.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on February 24, 2012, 01:59:23 PM
At this Nats we should shave Gabe instead of Tim.
But then he'll lose his power!  We need him to trump RLKs so we don't have to.
So he will be like Sampson?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 24, 2012, 02:05:36 PM
At this Nats we should shave Gabe instead of Tim.
But then he'll lose his power!  We need him to trump RLKs so we don't have to.
So he will be like Sampson?
Samson never had any power to begin with. At least, not the U/L one that seems to be all the rave these days.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Crashfach2002 on February 24, 2012, 06:15:36 PM
At this Nats we should shave Gabe instead of Tim.
But then he'll lose his power!  We need him to trump RLKs so we don't have to.
So he will be like Sampson?
Samson never had any power to begin with. At least, not the U/L one that seems to be all the rave these days.

Wait!?!?  Are you saying Gabe has no super human powers that are derived from his hair?  If so, what is that aura around him?  Please don't say dandruff!    ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Warrior_Monk on February 25, 2012, 11:44:49 PM
Wait!?!?  Are you saying Gabe has no super human powers that are derived from his hair?  If so, what is that aura around him?  Please don't say dandruff!    ;D
I'm saying comparing Gabe to Samson would be like comparing Marcus Mumford to Justin Bieber.

Taking that analogy and running with it, Gabe is easily debatable as one of the best things that ever happened to Redemption, taking things to a whole new level. Marcus Mumford is easily debatable as one of the best things that music currently has.

Samson, despite being quite popular in Redemption, is a terrible terrible hero. Justin Bieber, despite being quite popular in music, is, well, not the best singer.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: CJSports on February 26, 2012, 08:26:54 AM
Wait!?!?  Are you saying Gabe has no super human powers that are derived from his hair?  If so, what is that aura around him?  Please don't say dandruff!    ;D
I'm saying comparing Gabe to Samson would be like comparing Marcus Mumford to Justin Bieber.

Taking that analogy and running with it, Gabe is easily debatable as one of the best things that ever happened to Redemption, taking things to a whole new level. Marcus Mumford is easily debatable as one of the best things that music currently has.

Samson, despite being quite popular in Redemption, is a terrible terrible hero. Justin Bieber, despite being quite popular in music, is, well, a horrendous singer.

FTFY  ;D
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: YourMathTeacher on February 26, 2012, 10:14:33 AM
So..... Nats location is Gabe's house (literally and metaphorically)?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on February 29, 2012, 03:05:07 AM
So..... Nats location is Gabe's house (literally and metaphorically)?

Gabe is going to need a big house ::)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: LordZardeck on February 29, 2012, 04:29:56 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.

I hope it's tennessee. If so, I might actually be able to attend, making it my first official tournament!
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on February 29, 2012, 06:14:13 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.

I hope it's tennessee. If so, I might actually be able to attend, making it my first official tournament!


Do you mean first nats, or first tournament?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Nameless on February 29, 2012, 09:02:11 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.

I hope it's tennessee. If so, I might actually be able to attend, making it my first official tournament!


Do you mean first nats, or first tournament?
He means both.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: LordZardeck on February 29, 2012, 10:59:43 AM
How many locations have sent in bids?

probably dozens but it's pretty much been narrowed down to 2-3 right now with Tennessee almost guaranteed to get it at this point.

I hope it's tennessee. If so, I might actually be able to attend, making it my first official tournament!


Do you mean first nats, or first tournament?
He means both.

^^ This
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: cookie monster on March 02, 2012, 05:47:06 AM
When will they make the official announcement about nats?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: SomeKittens on March 02, 2012, 09:04:50 AM
When will they make the official announcement about nats?
"Soon."  Rob's pretty busy this time of year.
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: LordZardeck on March 03, 2012, 02:56:55 PM
Oh, PLEASE make it the first week of august. I have to be back by the second week to start college. :p
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: Chronic Apathy on March 03, 2012, 03:00:36 PM
Whoa, Zardeck's an admin now?
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: LordZardeck on March 03, 2012, 03:22:32 PM
Whoa, Zardeck's an admin now?

See here (http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/redemption-official-rules/new-forum-features-announcement/)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: STAMP on March 03, 2012, 04:17:30 PM
Whoa, Zardeck's an admin now?

He's more than deserving.  :)
Title: Re: Nats location?
Post by: LordZardeck on March 03, 2012, 04:27:41 PM
Whoa, Zardeck's an admin now?

He's more than deserving.  :)

Actually, I have no duties and responsibilities of the traditional admin. My admin privileges are solely to allow me access to modifying the forum.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal