Author Topic: Rule breakers (Read 16212 times)

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #25 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:43:01 PM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 31, 2011, 02:37:05 PM

Since rule 4 is no longer valid, RDT, you are the biggest noob I have ever met. Who plays a Disciples Type 2 deck without a Fishing Boat? Only you would.

Better Question - Who builds a T2 Disciples deck without fishing boat. I'm innocent of this crime - I was simply the pilot. Even Armstrong would have crashed into the Moon if his shuttle was built poorly.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #26 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:46:55 PM »

Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on July 31, 2011, 02:43:01 PM

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 31, 2011, 02:37:05 PM
Since rule 4 is no longer valid, RDT, you are the biggest noob I have ever met. Who plays a Disciples Type 2 deck without a Fishing Boat? Only you would.

Better Question - Who builds a T2 Disciples deck without fishing boat. I'm innocent of this crime - I was simply the pilot. Even Armstrong would have crashed into the Moon if his shuttle was built poorly.

If you consider a deck that won a Regional Tournament equivalent to a shuttle crashing into the moon, I only have this to say:

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #27 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:48:24 PM »

If rdt doesn't use Fishing Boat it's more like rdEZ. BURNSICK*.

*Do not check the origin of that word. Starcraft has overtaken my vocabulary.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #28 on:** July 31, 2011, 02:49:18 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on July 31, 2011, 02:48:24 PM

If rdt doesn't use Fishing Boat it's more like rdEZ. BURNSICK*.

*Do not check the origin of that word. Starcraft has overtaken my vocabulary.

Please do not distract from the importance of this thread. Can I or can I not spam, seeing as I can join an exclusive group?

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #29 on:** July 31, 2011, 03:00:00 PM »

(╯°□°）╯︵ spoɯ

That's literally an image of me overthrowing the system. I'm not going to be part of your system. NOTE: This is an art. It is not meant to be taken literally by the first definition.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #30 on:** July 31, 2011, 03:00:54 PM »

Is that Kirby picture actual size?

SomeKittens · « **Reply #31 on:** July 31, 2011, 04:59:26 PM »

I've got an exclusive group known as the "Rochester Raiders." We only allow those who live in Rochester (NY) to join. Am I not allowed to do this anymore?

The above statement could be seen as frivolous. Am I not allowed to say that?

I'm also a mod. Can I have an opinion here at all?

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #32 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:05:47 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 31, 2011, 04:59:26 PM

I've got an exclusive group known as the "Rochester Raiders." We only allow those who live in Rochester (NY) to join. Am I not allowed to do this anymore?

I don't think that's a board related group, so you should be ok.

Quote

The above statement could be seen as frivolous. Am I not allowed to say that?

I took it very srsly. It was on topic.

Quote

I'm also a mod. Can I have an opinion here at all?

Of course. If I didn't allow you to have an opinion, that would be an exclusive group (like the playtesters and the admins).

SomeKittens · « **Reply #33 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:09:53 PM »

There's a bunch of us on the boards. Seems related.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #34 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:12:04 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 31, 2011, 05:09:53 PM

There's a bunch of us on the boards. Seems related.

It's not based on the boards in anyway, but rather it is brought onto the boards because of the fact several of you are on the boards. Therefore, it should be ok, because the boards was not the central place where the exclusive club was formed.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #35 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:15:10 PM »

So I can have all the exclusive clubs I want, as long as they weren't formed on the boards?

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #36 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:18:51 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 31, 2011, 05:15:10 PM

So I can have all the exclusive clubs I want, as long as they weren't formed on the boards?

It's been my interpretation of the rules that you can not use the boards to facilitate the creation or sustainment of any exclusive clubs. Doing so violates the rules of the boards as laid down by former administrator Doug Gray.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #37 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:24:18 PM »

Ah, I missed the sustainment part. So this post isn't ok?

http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/official-tournaments/rochester-ny-tournaments/

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #38 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:25:51 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 31, 2011, 05:24:18 PM

Ah, I missed the sustainment part. So this post isn't ok?

http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/official-tournaments/rochester-ny-tournaments/

I believe that post would be ok, because it is not discussing a closed local tournament. Technically, anyone could travel to such a tournament, it's just we choose to stay home because of distance/money/etc.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #39 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:29:27 PM »

So we're discriminating against those at extreme distance/lesser financial standing.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #40 on:** July 31, 2011, 05:31:43 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on July 31, 2011, 05:29:27 PM

So we're discriminating against those at extreme distance/lesser financial standing.

It's my personal decision to pay my car off rather than attend your tournament. It is not location-based discrimination in anyway.

browarod · « **Reply #41 on:** July 31, 2011, 07:13:23 PM »

ITT: serious business.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #42 on:** July 31, 2011, 07:24:16 PM »

Quote from: browarod on July 31, 2011, 07:13:23 PM

ITT: serious business.

I think you mean srs bsns.

browarod · « **Reply #43 on:** July 31, 2011, 08:14:34 PM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on July 31, 2011, 07:24:16 PM

Quote from: browarod on July 31, 2011, 07:13:23 PM
ITT: serious business.

I think you mean srs bsns.

That, too.

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #44 on:** August 01, 2011, 08:15:51 PM »

Bump for moderator clarification.

Bobbert · « **Reply #45 on:** August 05, 2011, 11:11:18 PM »

Quote from: The Warrior on August 05, 2011, 11:03:20 PM

Yes i agree a amendment should be made to Constitution of the Cactus Game Design Online Message Board (or some other official name)

"We the players, in order to form a more perfect union, establish Que and ANB....

...to be required in every deck! No, then the supply would run out.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #46 on:** August 06, 2011, 12:13:15 AM »

Quote from: Thomas Hunter on August 05, 2011, 11:11:18 PM

Quote from: The Warrior on August 05, 2011, 11:03:20 PM
Yes i agree a amendment should be made to Constitution of the Cactus Game Design Online Message Board (or some other official name)

"We the players, in order to form a more perfect union, establish Que and ANB....

...to be required in every deck! No, then the supply would run out.

Some people have a monopoly on them already...

I'm really kinda surprised this thread is still alive.

COUNTER_SNIPER · « **Reply #47 on:** August 06, 2011, 01:33:11 AM »

Seems like a good place to ask this: WHERE IS THE JOKE THREAD?

? WHO DONE GOTTEN IT DELETED?

What rule was broken that it got taken down? I've seen FAR WORSE stuff posted on this forum and a JOKE thread in OFF-TOPIC gets deleted? Seriously lighten up (Dead serious, no pun intended)

-C_S

Alex_Olijar · « **Reply #48 on:** August 06, 2011, 08:43:26 AM »

Quote from: Alex_Olijar on August 01, 2011, 08:15:51 PM

Bump for moderator clarification.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #49 on:** August 06, 2011, 07:50:46 PM »

Come to think of it, my pickup lines thread was locked for no reason. I'd like a ruling on that.

/not to mention several of my non-offensive posts that were deleted.

News:

Author Topic: Rule breakers (Read 16212 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

Rawrlolsauce!

browarod

browarod

Warrior_Monk