Author Topic: battle axe  (Read 4618 times)

Offline Asahel24601

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 695
  • So many new weapons, so little deck space
    • -
    • North Central Region
battle axe
« on: May 02, 2012, 07:48:45 AM »
-5

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2012, 09:28:20 AM »
+1
way OP, there needs to be a cost to negate and discard a site/fortress.  maybe:

discard this card to discard a site, fortress, or curse

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
battle axe
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2012, 10:24:19 AM »
0
I totally agree with sepjazz seems overbearing especially since it can be used over and over


Faith ain't easy to understand 1 bird in the bush beats 2 in your hand
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2012, 01:01:09 PM »
0
Agreeing all around.  The current reusable Site/Fort killer ASA requires an Assyrian to be in play (more difficult in T1), and it can only be used as a block.  Being able to use this every turn as a hero (meaning in RA or BC if you can't rescue anything) is very OP.  You'd wipe them out in only a few turns.

There would have to be a pretty extensive restrict to make this card balanced for offense.  Otherwise, I would suggest having it discard itself in order to do the discard.

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2012, 03:30:16 PM »
0
I'd put it as 'Remove this Card to Negate and Discard a Site or Fortress.' I think that would be better.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2012, 04:00:40 PM »
0
 +1 with mega . . .also u should rename it the "christmas" battle axe (red/green) brigade lol
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2012, 04:09:09 PM »
0
I disagree with a RFG cost.  Honestly, a discard cost is more than enough, since it would be restricted in deck construction as dual-colored, is not from a book that recurs its own enhancements, and if they do manage a recursion they could likely have something better anyway.

Discard would work better as a balance, while keeping the card useful, and would also be in-line with similar card abilities.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: battle axe
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2012, 02:24:10 PM »
0
Discard wouldn't be nearly enough of a cost on a weapon with no targeting restrictions or alternatives for your opponent. Discard in and withdraw all Heroes from battle is a more appropriate cost.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2012, 07:00:09 PM »
0
Discard wouldn't be nearly enough of a cost on a weapon with no targeting restrictions or alternatives for your opponent. Discard in and withdraw all Heroes from battle is a more appropriate cost.

...wut.

That is a...ridiculously high cost.  Here is a card already in use:

Razor - good (FF2)

Type: Hero Enh. • Brigade: Green • Ability: 2 / 1 • Class: None • Special Ability: If Isaiah or an Assyrian is in play, discard an opponent's character in battle, or negate and discard a single color Site, Artifact, or evil card in a territory.

Note that this card negates and discards those pesky evil fortresses and sites, and can also target an artifact or a character in battle (fun to have versatility).  And, oh right, you can play it off of HT and recur it infinitely.  Not to mention a certain someone makes it CBN.

Absolutely discard is an appropriate cost in fitting with the current cards out there, especially since there is not a specific recur to get it back.  Having you essentially have to lose a battle like you're suggesting is way overkill and has no precedent in the actual cards out there.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2012, 07:05:54 PM »
0
you have to get initiative to play an enhancement and recurring takes more cards while the axe enters battle over and over with out needing to be recurred
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2012, 07:09:12 PM »
0
you have to get initiative to play an enhancement and recurring takes more cards while the axe enters battle over and over with out needing to be recurred

You have obviously never played an Isaiah deck when it's rolling ;)

1. Place enhancement on deck with Isaiah.
2. Draw X (Isaiah angels)...it's in your hand, yay! :D
3. Play off of Hidden Treasures (CBN)
4. KABOOM!
5. Prophet.

And if you try to say it's hard to pull off...again, never played an Isaiah deck when it's rolling.  So many angels, Call and WWW search everyone out, and you just start blowing things up or playing the million other nasty things he has.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2012, 07:18:56 PM »
0
you still need initiative to play it and thats like 5 plus cards verses one that gets used over and over  so 1 card to do what it takes 5 plus to do is OP
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2012, 07:25:57 PM »
0
you still need initiative to play it and thats like 5 plus cards verses one that gets used over and over  so 1 card to do what it takes 5 plus to do is OP

False on the first.

Hidden Treasures (FF)

Type: Artifact • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Once per turn, if your lone green brigade prophet begins a battle, you may play an Enhancement or discard an evil Enhancement in an opponent's deck.

And on needing 5 cards...again, you have never played against an Isaiah deck.  They search literally everything they need out.  Once one piece is in the place, the rest falls in place very quickly.

This card cannot be used over and over if you discard it.  There is not a recur for it.  I cannot understand the argument that discard is not enough, let alone RFG.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #13 on: May 03, 2012, 07:31:27 PM »
0
im not arguing that an isaiah deck cant do it im just saying it requires more then drawing a single card and if ur trying to make a 50-56 card deck using one to do what it takes several to do is very powerful . . IMO too powerful
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #14 on: May 03, 2012, 07:36:38 PM »
0
im not arguing that an isaiah deck cant do it im just saying it requires more then drawing a single card and if ur trying to make a 50-56 card deck using one to do what it takes several to do is very powerful . . IMO too powerful

Ok, seriously, how are you going to use it over and over without even more of a set-up?

Tell me how this card is more powerful if it gets discarded to do its effect just like an enhancement?  Please, I have no idea where you are coming from.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #15 on: May 03, 2012, 07:37:57 PM »
0
the card says dc to dc a curse not to negate and dc a fort though
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #16 on: May 03, 2012, 07:40:46 PM »
0
the card says dc to dc a curse not to negate and dc a fort though

Sorry, I was suggesting adding a discard to the ability to do that part too.

There would have to be a pretty extensive restrict to make this card balanced for offense.  Otherwise, I would suggest having it discard itself in order to do the discard.

I was countering others who said that it should be RFG or even more in order to do the ability.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #17 on: May 03, 2012, 07:43:00 PM »
0
ahhh i see what ur saying i wasnt taking into account the thread  . . . misunderstand  . . . i would say ur prolly right then that a dc to negate and dc a fort site or curse would be fine
JMM is a modern day prophet

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2012, 12:20:24 PM »
0
This card cannot be used over and over if you discard it.  There is not a recur for it.  I cannot understand the argument that discard is not enough, let alone RFG.

A Soldier's Prayer, which is in 99.9% of all competitive Red decks.
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2012, 12:28:42 PM »
0
This card cannot be used over and over if you discard it.  There is not a recur for it.  I cannot understand the argument that discard is not enough, let alone RFG.

A Soldier's Prayer, which is in 99.9% of all competitive Red decks.

Micah can also recur it.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #20 on: May 04, 2012, 01:42:29 PM »
0
How about Negate a single color site or evil fortress for remainder of battle. If used by a warrior class hero you may discard this card to discard a negated evil card.

It's similar but more useful and innovative. It also limits the effective use with prophets.
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2378
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #21 on: May 04, 2012, 01:50:38 PM »
0
This card cannot be used over and over if you discard it.  There is not a recur for it.  I cannot understand the argument that discard is not enough, let alone RFG.

A Soldier's Prayer, which is in 99.9% of all competitive Red decks.
competitive red decks?
/oh yeah Sam decks can use red
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: battle axe
« Reply #22 on: May 04, 2012, 06:04:46 PM »
+1
Isaiah+HT has a high cost too. You can't use Seraph, making the attack much less likely to succeed, and it costs your art slot, which is an insane cost for everything. Having a weapon that kills forts with basically no stipulation is way too good.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: battle axe
« Reply #23 on: May 04, 2012, 08:25:39 PM »
0
Having a weapon that kills forts with basically no stipulation is way too good.

I don't understand where I didn't agree with this.  I showed how cards that perform similar abilities have a lot of restrictions or discard themselves (either de facto because of not being WC, or by saying "discard this card to...").

It is more in-line with similar abilities for it to have a discard clause to perform its ability.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: battle axe
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2012, 06:45:06 PM »
0
Just discarding itself is no cost. May as well make it territory-class.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal