here is the chart:Um out of one of my payments for chicken working I could pay that.(No chicken house working is NOT worth it!)
Current
1M Gold: $7.99
3M Gold: $19.99
12M Gold: $49.99
Starting Nov 1, 2010
1M Gold: $9.99
3M Gold: $24.99
12M Gold: $59.99
and no, it is not worth it. maybe if we got additional useful content over the years to justify such an increase. as it stands, there isnt, micro$oft is just all about the money.
See this is where (and probably the only real point) PS3 is better than Xbox...don't get me wrong I love..love xbox but really....take a note from sony. Free online...
The thing you guys are missing is that different systems are better for different games. Caleb and G. Samaritan (and MKC) seem to be shooter fans, so of course they like XBOX the best.
+1 Lean controls are addicting.The thing you guys are missing is that different systems are better for different games. Caleb and G. Samaritan (and MKC) seem to be shooter fans, so of course they like XBOX the best.
Correction, they should like PC best for shooters. Free multiplayer, Dedicated servers, AND more precise controls. ;)
The thing you guys are missing is that different systems are better for different games. Caleb and G. Samaritan (and MKC) seem to be shooter fans, so of course they like XBOX the best.
Correction, they should like PC best for shooters. Free multiplayer, Dedicated servers, AND more precise controls. ;)
Well, yes. But since the discussion was between consoles, I just left it at XBOX ;)The thing you guys are missing is that different systems are better for different games. Caleb and G. Samaritan (and MKC) seem to be shooter fans, so of course they like XBOX the best.
Correction, they should like PC best for shooters. Free multiplayer, Dedicated servers, AND more precise controls. ;)
Well, yes. But since the discussion was between consoles, I just left it at XBOX ;)
Dedicated servers - I've only been lagged/droped connection in a game 7 times in my three years of gaming,between the PC ,PS3 ,and 360.
It doesn't matter. The Wii is better than XBox 360 and PS3 combined. Yeah, I said it. What now?
It doesn't matter. The Wii is better than XBox 360 and PS3 combined. Yeah, I said it. What now?
shes a witch! BURN HER, BURN HER! ;)
People still play Halo on computers?all day long :-*
It doesn't matter. The Wii is better than XBox 360 and PS3 combined. Yeah, I said it. What now?
I'd say there's a lot more hackers on pc than all consoles combined. That's one of pc's huge downsides.
Daniel
:thumbup:
whats the big deal with last stand? i can understand martyrdom, but to ban players just because they use a certain in-game perk or weapon is just silly.
The thing is TGT is OP Martyrdom isn'twhats the big deal with last stand? i can understand martyrdom, but to ban players just because they use a certain in-game perk or weapon is just silly.
Would you ban TGT if you had the chance? I think that answers your question.
The thing is TGT is OP Martyrdom isn'twhats the big deal with last stand? i can understand martyrdom, but to ban players just because they use a certain in-game perk or weapon is just silly.
Would you ban TGT if you had the chance? I think that answers your question.
You can run away from a dropped grenade, but never TGT.thank you for the new sig.
You can run away from a dropped grenade, but never TGT.
You can run away from a dropped grenade, but never TGT.
QFT.
Quoted For Truth aka I agreeYou can run away from a dropped grenade, but never TGT.
QFT.
What's that?
whats the big deal with last stand? i can understand martyrdom, but to ban players just because they use a certain in-game perk or weapon is just silly.
How so? That's only certain servers that don't allow those perks.
whats the big deal with last stand? i can understand martyrdom, but to ban players just because they use a certain in-game perk or weapon is just silly.
It's just a server rule. They don't want those perks used on that server, and will kick or ban you if you don't follow them. Simple.
You're not banned from the entire game. :P
So...pretty sure Microsoft is like a cricket to the skyscraper that is Sony. :P The only reason they make so much money is because their product stinks so much. I've had innumerable friends that have had red ring/blue screen of death/dead system. Some, more than once. And their controllers (thinking specifically of guitar hero guitars at least) die all the time too. I'm too cheap to own an xBox. I've never heard even once of a PS3 die. :P Just saying. And my PS2 only died after having been run for 6 whole years. Sony is pretty awesome. ;DThe guitars/drums die universally, I can assure you of that.
So...pretty sure Microsoft is like a cricket to the skyscraper that is Sony. :P The only reason they make so much money is because their product stinks so much. I've had innumerable friends that have had red ring/blue screen of death/dead system. Some, more than once. And their controllers (thinking specifically of guitar hero guitars at least) die all the time too. I'm too cheap to own an xBox. I've never heard even once of a PS3 die. :P Just saying. And my PS2 only died after having been run for 6 whole years. Sony is pretty awesome. ;D
If you even thought about opening your 360, Microsoft would cancel your warranty and probably fine you or something. :D
Great thing about PC's, if you have the knowledge to do so, you can usually fix them on your own if they seriously crash. Can't do that with Xbox/PS3 without ruining your warranty most of the time.
3 rrod is usually covered by microsoft free of charge, warranty or not. its the other rings that are not (1, 2, or 4). microsoft has been very considerate with players experiencing the biggest hardware hiccup in history, and i have had all of my 360's repaired free of charge with a turnaround of about 2 or 3 weeks in my experience. they'll even usually throw in some free gifts with your repaired console as well (to date, i've received free subs, points, controllers, wireless headsets, and faceplates on return repairs).
Either one kills PC too, what?? haha.
Either one kills PC too, what?? haha.
Never. :P
PC > consoles.
Playing CoD4 on a PC > MW2 regardless. ;)
And, PC's can be plugged in to TV's as well.
the console hardware also stands up considerably well during its lifespan as well. its not like the best pc videocards out there completely blow the ps3 or 360 out of the water in terms of graphical improvement. as long as i have my hd, im cool.
the console hardware also stands up considerably well during its lifespan as well. its not like the best pc videocards out there completely blow the ps3 or 360 out of the water in terms of graphical improvement. as long as i have my hd, im cool.Point 1.) correct. However, "stands up well" means "no games with better graphics" rather than "can handle new graphics".
Maybe so, but it is infinitely easier to hack a PC game than a console game. It still happens to both, but it is more frequent with PC games.
This is based on personal experience, or a verifiable study?
Point 2.) Absolutely incorrect. We can hit resolutions much better than yours, and then add another monitor (or five)
And we've had 3D for years. http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-3d-games.html (http://www.nvidia.com/object/3d-vision-3d-games.html)3D. For years. As of now, yours are "in development". Just like Duke Nukem Forever.
lulz at nvidia '3-d'. can we even call it that? you know, you can add as much perfume as you want to crap...but in the end, its still crap.This quote brought to you by:
...oh, btw, killzone 3 has a confirmed release date of feb 22, 2011. goodbye pc graphics, hello true 3-d (and hello sony bravia 3dtv for me).
lulz at nvidia '3-d'. can we even call it that? you know, you can add as much perfume as you want to crap...but in the end, its still crap.
...oh, btw, killzone 3 has a confirmed release date of feb 22, 2011. goodbye pc graphics, hello true 3-d (and hello sony bravia 3dtv for me).
yup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.
yup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.
Like flies on poop?
yup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.
Like flies on poop?
well, this is true 3d, not nvidia 3d. ;)
Says the person who's never tried it. Based on the same factor, Killzone 3 is nothing more than yet another halo clone. And it can't even rip something off correctly.
yup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.
i've never played a kz game myself, but as kittens pointed out, its pretty much a halo/gow-esque kind of fps. with cod and halo dominating the market, other fps' pretty much walk in their shadow and dont get noticed all that much. hopefully people will be drawn in by the 3d.
I still, from the vantage point of never having anything to do with it, think it's terrible. And all the three-dee stinks.Says the person who's never tried it. Based on the same factor, Killzone 3 is nothing more than yet another halo clone. And it can't even rip something off correctly.
since when were we discussing story material versus graphical performance? i could care less if it was a man on a mission to save a ham sandwich...ITS FREAKIN' TRUE 3D! :)
it is also not necessary for anyone to try it when anyone can see, for fact, it is a real 3d game.
i've never played a kz game myself, but as kittens pointed out, its pretty much a halo/gow-esque kind of fps. with cod and halo dominating the market, other fps' pretty much walk in their shadow and dont get noticed all that much. hopefully people will be drawn in by the 3d.
Very true. It's probably one of those games that you have to know EVERYTHING about it, like UFC Undisputed. I prefer button-masher fighting games.
I still, from the vantage point of never having anything to do with it, think it's terrible. And all the three-dee stinks.
Which is all well and good, if you like bland fps action (I don't), but that doesn't make the console "better".
As to the 3D, PC had it first.
...so the only solid fact is that we had it years before you.
I would hazard a guess that most of the research come from us.
I'd rather play a 2D Portal 2 than a 3D (insert bland FPS here) any day of the week.QuoteWhich is all well and good, if you like bland fps action (I don't), but that doesn't make the console "better".3d versus non-3d...hmm, yeah, thats a tough call there...
I'd rather play a 2D Portal 2 than a 3D (insert bland FPS here) any day of the week.
Look at your hand. It has three dimensions. Look at your screen. No matter how images may appear to be 3D, it is not truly three-dimensional.
this entire discussion has been about true 3d (and lets clarify, when i say true 3d, i mean the best the industry can push out currently, which is the kind that is viewed on 3dtv's)...
As to subjective, your argument that an entire gaming platform is better due to it having a certain type of graphics capability is entirely subjective.
Says the person who's never tried it. Based on the same factor, Killzone 3 is nothing more than yet another halo clone. And it can't even rip something off correctly.
since when were we discussing story material versus graphical performance? i could care less if it was a man on a mission to save a ham sandwich...ITS FREAKIN' TRUE 3D! :)
it is also not necessary for anyone to try it when anyone can see, for fact, it is a real 3d game.
you were the only one that has brought up actual 3 dimensional
if you argued that super nintendo graphics were better than xbox 360 graphics, i would be ashamed to call you a gamer.If you argued that Shadowrun was a better game than Super Mario Brothers because it had better graphics, I'd be ashamed to call you a gamer.
oops.
If you argued that Shadowrun was a better game than Super Mario Brothers because it had better graphics, I'd be ashamed to call you a gamer.
QuoteIf you argued that Shadowrun was a better game than Super Mario Brothers because it had better graphics, I'd be ashamed to call you a gamer.
ooo, is this a straw man??? i believe it is!!! :o :o :o
Point 1. You used the words "Real 3D". I can either read your mind (which I can't), or take your words literally. I won't accept responsibility for your inability to communicate.
Point 2. You have very much to learn. Do some actual research before using a term like "straw man", so you won't look like as much of an idiot when you shoot your mouth off.
Subpoint A. This is not an example of a "Straw Man" argument. You can clearly tell by my use of the word "if". It was a hypothetical situation, rather than postulating you said something you didn't.
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:
1.Person A has position X.
2.Person B disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially-similar position Y.
Subpoint B. I simply rephrased something you said.
you should take responsibility for the inability to comprehend.See that big, wooden looking thing inhibiting your vision?