Author Topic: T:1 Side Kick (a few cards changed) (Read 5566 times)

SoulSaver · « **on:** September 19, 2008, 04:55:56 PM »

This deck is an experiment, any comments suggestions are welcome. All I've got to say is this deck is a lot of fun to play, I know this deck still needs many improvements, but that's why I posted it. The main problem I'm having with this deck is the offense. Have at it

Cards in deck:50

Lost Souls:8
Hopper
1st round
Women only
NT only
Shuffler
2 line
Exchanger
Cannot be prevented

Dominants:9
SoG
NJ
AotL
HT
Guardian new card
FA
Destruction
Burial
CM

Fortress/sites:3
Storehouse
Obediah's Caves new card
Dragon Raid

Artifacts:4
Chariot of Fire
The Bronze Laver
HoH
Gifts

Green Heroes:5
Nehum
Joel
Micah
David
Hur

Green Enhancements:5
Two Bears
Plague of Frogs
Sword of the Lord
Search
Visions

Crimson Evil Characters:4
Nergalsharezer
Archers of Kedar
Arioch
King Rehobaom new card

Crimson Enhancements:3
Arrogance
Great Image
Swift Horses

Pale Green Evil Characters:2
Assyrian Archer
The Tartan

Pale Green Enhancements:4
Confusion
2k Horses
Words of Discouragement
Death of Unrighteous

Multi Enhancements:3
Love of Money
Besieging the City
Momentum Change

STAMP · « **Reply #1 on:** September 19, 2008, 05:08:27 PM »

I built and played a deck similar to this one against Chronic Apathy yesterday and got pwned at the end. Even though I made a couple of mistakes, I think the best I could have done is get one more LS (he won 5-3).

So, yes, it needs more to the offense. Once I figure out what it is that works for me I'll let you know.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #2 on:** September 19, 2008, 08:06:55 PM »

Maybe sowing the seed to mess up their territory as your side battles mess up the rest of their areas?

SoulSaver · « **Reply #3 on:** September 22, 2008, 04:44:35 PM »

This deck actually works very well, it comes out extremely quick. It's record so far is 2-1-1 it has scored at least 4 every game so far.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #4 on:** October 03, 2008, 10:11:35 PM »

...What the heck is Arrogance for?

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #5 on:** October 04, 2008, 03:23:01 PM »

I agree arrogence seems out of place. Imo it would be better to make the defense one color. Any good offense would rip through your current defense.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #6 on:** October 04, 2008, 08:45:51 PM »

Yeah, the defense looks extremely flimsy to me.

JSB23 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 04, 2008, 09:14:43 PM »

Swords to Plowshares

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #8 on:** October 04, 2008, 09:17:14 PM »

Yeah, that might be a good addition, too.

SoulSaver · « **Reply #9 on:** October 04, 2008, 09:36:20 PM »

This deck is to my playing style without a massive offense ( I usually don't use a defense ). If you don't know why Arrogance is in the deck then you don't get the strategy of the deck and you really missed the boat about what this deck is all about. I'm not going to spell it out, I'll let you younger/inexperienced players try to figure it out on your own. This deck so far has surprised me, and surpassed all expectations. My newest version will be used as my main deck for this tourny season, I think its that good. I don't know why I haven't tried playing this deck before now, its sooo much fun to play with. It gives me more of a rush than any speed deck ever did. And I like that it's unconventional/not used by anyone that I know.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #10 on:** October 04, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »

Wow. I have to say, you seem reaaaaaally full of it.

Gabe · « **Reply #11 on:** October 05, 2008, 12:06:32 AM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on October 04, 2008, 11:11:21 PM

Wow. I have to say, you seem reaaaaaally full of it.

Yeh, I mean, look at that deck. Is that a gray enhancement I see? And there isn't even a gray evil character to play it on. If that guy hadn't won an event at Nationals both of the past two years I'd think he was a total n00b.

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #12 on:** October 05, 2008, 07:13:24 AM »

Yeah.

Well, whatever works.

Lawfuldog · « **Reply #13 on:** October 18, 2008, 06:04:01 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on October 04, 2008, 11:11:21 PM

Wow. I have to say, you seem reaaaaaally full of it.

^
This made me laugh pretty hard.

And Daniel, you should post your new T1 deck and see if anyone has any suggestions. I'm not an expert of Silver or Orange so I'm probably forgetting something.

Annnd, my cell phone died the other night. Mah bad.

Captain Falcon · « **Reply #14 on:** November 02, 2008, 03:10:14 PM »

it lacks big numbers. you also need Zechariah, Benaiah, benaiah snatches a spear, spiritual warfare, abel's sacrifice, david's music (andi-demon) and wickedness removed. Also, take oup visions (it eats up enhancements for you) and put in provisions. Play provisions on nahum, make them block w/assyrian archer, negating his ablilty and then ignore him; don't kill him. That'd be a great play.

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #15 on:** November 02, 2008, 05:45:02 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on October 04, 2008, 11:11:21 PM

Wow. I have to say, you seem reaaaaaally full of it.

he has the right to be full of it

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #16 on:** November 03, 2008, 07:53:11 AM »

Has this deck actually been tested?

Lawfuldog · « **Reply #17 on:** November 03, 2008, 08:47:13 AM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on November 03, 2008, 07:53:11 AM

Has this deck actually been tested?

I've played it a few times. If the combo comes out, there's really nothing you can do.

SoulSaver · « **Reply #18 on:** November 03, 2008, 09:11:58 AM »

The thing that surprises me about this deck is that the combo comes out on a consistent basis.

Lawfuldog · « **Reply #19 on:** November 03, 2008, 09:31:27 AM »

Quote from: SoulSaver on November 03, 2008, 09:11:58 AM

The thing that surprises me about this deck is that the combo comes out on a consistent basis.

Which is the beauty of a 50 card deck.

SoulSaver · « **Reply #20 on:** November 03, 2008, 10:57:51 AM »

True dat

Captain Falcon · « **Reply #21 on:** November 03, 2008, 09:08:43 PM »

Quote from: SoulSaver on November 03, 2008, 10:57:51 AM

True dat

double true

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #22 on:** November 04, 2008, 06:18:33 PM »

I'm becoming fond of small but efficient 50 card decks.

Gabe · « **Reply #23 on:** July 08, 2009, 02:13:59 PM »

Time to resurrect this thread. The deck needs more Babel.

SerpentSlayer · « **Reply #24 on:** July 08, 2009, 02:43:59 PM »

lol Maybe I'll update it soon...

Any more thoughts on this deck?

Mr.Hiatus · « **Reply #25 on:** July 08, 2009, 03:18:13 PM »

Well it seems that the defense would be better if there was more sidebattle cards on your offense. Maybe you could split your already small ofense into blue and green? That way you have 2 sidebattle cards so you can get your combo more. Call me though maybe I am seeing somehting wrong. Also the other week I was at the beach and lost my phone.

Red · « **Reply #26 on:** July 09, 2009, 02:27:00 PM »

is this deck that crushed ma at GA state?oh wait the ohther one had spitul warfare.

News:

Author Topic: T:1 Side Kick (a few cards changed) (Read 5566 times)

SoulSaver

SoulSaver

SoulSaver

michael/michaelssword

SoulSaver

SoulSaver

SerpentSlayer