Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Type 1 Deck Advice => Topic started by: robm on February 24, 2021, 10:03:02 PM

Title: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: robm on February 24, 2021, 10:03:02 PM
Is site lockout still a useful strategy? If so what good brigades are used less?

I have been testing something out that has worked against my other decks but those decks currently don’t have too many ways to access sites.

Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: chazmaniandevil on February 24, 2021, 10:14:43 PM
There is almost virtually no site lockout. Removing souls from the table and intentional soul drought are more common. Most players won’t use up the card slots to put in more than 2-3 sites in a deck. There’s also the Ends of the Earth multi colored site from Revelation of John that is used to access all sites. And many players include cards that generate lost souls for their opponent, as a means to rescue if there are none available (by site lock or drought) using Majestic Heavens, the various characters that capture themselves to opposite’s land of bondage from Fall of Man and Lineage of Christ sets. To summarize, avoid inserting multiple sites in attempt to site lock. But for reference, teal and clay are probably the two least good brigades used. Silver isn’t hugely popular either. Hope this helps!
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: Red on February 24, 2021, 10:18:34 PM
Joshua the Conqueror has ended sitelock as even a fringe strategy. Within popular offenses, some have infinite site access, such as Flood Survivors getting site access on account of Ham's territory class ability.
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: TheJaylor on February 24, 2021, 11:35:08 PM
Joshua the Conqueror has ended sitelock as even a fringe strategy. Within popular offenses, some have infinite site access, such as Flood Survivors getting site access on account of Ham's territory class ability.
Challenge accepted.
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: Sean on February 25, 2021, 06:59:59 AM
Joshua the Conqueror has ended sitelock as even a fringe strategy. Within popular offenses, some have infinite site access, such as Flood Survivors getting site access on account of Ham's territory class ability.
Joshua would also help Site Lock decks though because you can underdeck your own Site which also underdecks the LS in it, right?

6 Babylon + Babylonian Banquet Hall, under deck BBH with Joshua to underdeck all of your LSs?
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: Reth on February 25, 2021, 10:12:10 AM
IMO LSs would stay in play. But this should be judged in the rulings section.
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: RedemptionAggie on February 25, 2021, 12:39:20 PM
Reth is correct. Sours in Sites is one of the exceptions to cards following.
Title: Re: Site lockout still a thing?
Post by: Sean on February 25, 2021, 12:41:18 PM
I just found it in the Reg
Quote
If a card is placed on another card and the underlying card is relocated, the placed card is generally relocated
(regardless of protect effects) to the same location that the underlying card is relocated and remains there. The
exceptions to this rule are:
1 Lost Souls that are placed in Sites are always returned to the general Land of Bondage and do not
follow the underlying Sites when the Sites are relocated.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal