Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Type 1 Deck Advice => Topic started by: TDK on March 22, 2010, 10:21:03 PM
-
im going to try grey but i dont know which ones to use i know that i only want two emperors and its 5 evil characters
-
5 ECs? And you're going with grey? ...Alright, well I would say you definitely have to have Nero as one of the emperors, since he is a standaloney kind of guy. However, the rest really, really depends on the rest of your deck.
-
5 ECs? And you're going with grey? ...Alright, well I would say you definitely have to have Nero as one of the emperors, since he is a standaloney kind of guy. However, the rest really, really depends on the rest of your deck.
ok well here what im thinking. nero, agustus, terrifing beast, leper, sabath breaker
-
not horrible. use those 5 ecs. through in an unholy writ and a balaams disobiediance and it looks good.
-
im going to try grey but i dont know which ones to use i know that i only want two emperors and its 5 evil characters
dude, grey birgades stratigys are meant to be big, i would recomend emporers full, or syrians full, if you use syrians try capture. and if you cant go wrong with emporers, just use enh that go good with them, and cards you like. captures may even go great with emporers.
ok thx
-
ok well here what im thinking. nero, agustus, terrifing beast, leper, sabath breaker
I dunno about Leper. I assume that this defense being small means that the offense is large, and thus you are trying to win quickly, correct? Well, Leper takes a while to actually do anything, and the game may be over by the time any heroes are actually discarded by it. If you like drawing, I would go with Emperor Vitellius instead, because then you will have two emperors who can use Namaan's Chariot and Horses and Heavy Taxes & company.
However, once again, I cannot give you well-informed advice without seeing the whole deck.
-
... it's a great idea, and it would require alot of good cards.
If it would require a lot of cards, then it isn't a great idea, because he's looking for a small defense.
However, if you mean good as in alignment, then...well, this still doesn't make any sense, because defenses don't require good cards at all.
-
I still don't understand what you are saying. I'm not trying to be rude, but I'm having a difficult time figuring out how your sentences relate to each other, or to anyone else's.
-
and please, next time you dont get what i say, quote it, cause i said a ton of things.
I don't understand what you are saying here. ;)
But seriously, it's just everything you say. Again, I don't want to insult you, but it's just really difficult to take you seriously when I don't understand half your posts. (BTW, the last post was relatively understandable.)
-
and please, next time you dont get what i say, quote it, cause i said a ton of things.
I don't understand what you are saying here. ;)
But seriously, it's just everything you say. Again, I don't want to insult you, but it's just really difficult to take you seriously when I don't understand half your posts. (BTW, the last post was relatively understandable.)
cause i don't talk logical, thats probly why ;)
oh well, not everyone has to understand me! *mumble* thats your own falt *mumble* hahaha! jk
no thx im fine my cards from three lions came in today i finished my offence but thx for the tip about the leper ill switch it out and out vitellis thx ;D