Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Type 1 Deck Advice => Topic started by: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 12:46:24 PM

Title: my multiplayer deck
Post by: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 12:46:24 PM: this is my newest multiplayer deck

Cards in deck: 63
Lost Souls: 8
Lost Soul
Lost Soul
Lost Soul (Color Guard)
Lost Soul (Female Only)
Lost Soul (shuffler)
Lost Soul (Site Discard)
Lost Soul (site doubler)
Lost Soul (Speed Bump)

Lamb Dominants: 3
Angel of the Lord
New Jerusalem
Son of God

Grim Reaper Dominants: 2
Burial
Christian Martyr

Fortresses: 4
Goshen
Raiders' Camp
Storehouse
Wall of Protection

Multi-Color Sites: 1
New Jerusalem (site)

Purple Sites: 1
Patmos

Artifacts: 3
Gifts of the Magi
Moses' Rod
Priestly Crown

White Covenant Cards: 1
Go Into Captivity (Crimson)

Gold Heroes: 5
Deborah
Israelite Archer
Mary of Bethany
Moses
Women of Israel

Green Heroes: 5
Aaron
Benaiah
Hur
Martha
Midwives

Multi-Color Hero Enhancements: 1
Spiritual Warfare

Gold Hero Enhancements: 6
Battle Prayer
Bow and Arrow
Fishers of Men
Furnace of God's Wrath
Taking Egypts Wealth
Training in Righteousness

Green Hero Enhancements: 7
Aaron's Rod
Abel's Sacrifice
Interceding for Battle
Plague of Frogs
Search
Tears for a Friend
Trust in the Lord

Crimson Evil Characters: 7
Ananias
Archers of Kedar
King Shallum
King Zimri
Possessing Demon
Red Dragon
Sapphira

Multi-Color Evil Enhancements: 1
Lying Unto God

Crimson Evil Enhancements: 7
Apprehended
Coliseum Lions
Deceit of Sapphira
Great Image
Imitating Evil
Political Bribes
Treachery of Jezebel

don't spam
just give me advice.
and not just putting in but taking out too
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: The Warrior on July 18, 2009, 12:50:05 PM: you could replace the too no SA soul for the NT only soul and */4 or Greater souls
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:08:05 PM: */4 soul isn't a good lost soul at all
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: drb1200 on July 18, 2009, 01:09:17 PM: Quote from: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:08:05 PM
*/4 soul isn't a good lost soul at all
Its the heck of a lot better than generic LS's. ;)
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: The Warrior on July 18, 2009, 01:13:13 PM: Quote from: drb1200 on July 18, 2009, 01:09:17 PM
Quote from: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:08:05 PM
*/4 soul isn't a good lost soul at all
Its the heck of a lot better than generic LS's. ;)
joke or not i agree
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:20:12 PM: i'm better off with generics then that lousy */4 soul
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: The Warrior on July 18, 2009, 01:28:05 PM: Quote from: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:20:12 PM
i'm better off with generics then that lousy */4 soul
i wont stop you,use the generics
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: New Raven BR on July 18, 2009, 01:30:00 PM: but i will put in nt only, haven't had a problem with it
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: The Warrior on July 18, 2009, 01:54:35 PM: :) glad i could be SOME help
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: Alex_Olijar on July 18, 2009, 02:11:18 PM: The */4 is better than generic souls for sure.
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: The Warrior on July 18, 2009, 10:59:45 PM: Quote from: Janissary on July 18, 2009, 02:11:18 PM
The */4 is better than generic souls for sure.
The only Problem is you cant rescue it with your own Sog/NJ.... nothing but a hero
bye the way :giveup: i dont care if */4 is better he doesnt want it.
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: Alex_Olijar on July 18, 2009, 11:05:59 PM: I don't find it that big of a problem. It means opposing inish heroes can't RA it.

Still needs less defense and a drop to 56.
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: bmc25 on July 19, 2009, 03:56:41 PM: 50 or 50 this is multi were talking bout! doms= win!
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: New Raven BR on July 19, 2009, 05:03:45 PM: Quote from: jasonbourne on July 19, 2009, 03:56:41 PM
50 or 50 this is multi were talking bout! doms= win!
:offtopic:
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on July 20, 2009, 04:01:05 AM: That wasn't off topic at all. He is saying to cut your deck down to 50 cards, because in multiplayer dominants control the game; so you need them fast. 50 cards is king.
Title: Re: my multiplayer deck
Post by: Gabe on July 20, 2009, 09:45:50 AM: Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on July 20, 2009, 04:01:05 AM
That wasn't off topic at all. He is saying to cut your deck down to 50 cards, because in multiplayer dominants control the game; so you need them fast. 50 cards is king.

+1