Author Topic: My first ever Royalty  (Read 5551 times)

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
My first ever Royalty
« on: February 28, 2009, 01:10:47 PM »
0
how'd I do?
Cards in deck: 50
Lost Souls: 8
   Lost Soul (*/4)
   Lost Soul (1st round)
   Lost Soul (demon discard)
   Lost Soul (Female Only)
   Lost Soul (hopper)
   Lost Soul (punisher)
   Lost Soul (shuffler)
   Lost Souls (2-line)

Lamb Dominants: 4
   Angel of the Lord
   Harvest Time
   New Jerusalem
   Son of God

Grim Reaper Dominants: 4
   Burial
   Christian Martyr
   Destruction of Nehushtan
   Falling Away

Fortresses: 1
   The Throne of David

Multi-Color Sites: 2
   Dragon Raid
   Promised Land

Artifacts: 4
   Burial Shroud
   Holy Grail
   Holy of Holies
   Unholy Writ

White Covenant Cards: 1
   I am Truth

Multi-Color Heroes: 1
   Melchizedek (purple/teal)

Purple Heroes: 11
   Elijah
   Esther
   Ethiopian Treasurer
   John
   King David
   King Hiram
   King Jotham
   King Lemuel
   King's Daughter
   Mephibosheth
   Widow

Multi-Color Hero Enhancements: 2
   First Fruits
   Pentecost

Purple Hero Enhancements: 6
   Authority of Christ
   Five Smooth Stones
   Peace Treaty
   Reach of Desperation
   Royal Parade
   Unified Kingdom

Crimson Evil Characters: 1
   King Zimri

Gray Evil Characters: 1
   Emperor Otho

Brown Evil Characters: 1
   Uzzah

Multi-Color Evil Enhancements: 2
   Love of Money
   Torment

Orange Evil Characters: 1
       Trembling Demon
« Last Edit: March 05, 2009, 07:24:45 PM by xCaLeBx »

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2009, 01:12:19 PM »
0
You don't need Chariot of Fire. Looks pretty good for a first draft.

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2009, 01:22:35 PM »
0
This deck makes me sick.... it needs a defense. ;) Asiiiide from that you need I am truth. I'd also remove  Testing S wis for peace treaty
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2009, 01:26:08 PM »
0
This deck makes me sick.... it needs a defense. ;) Asiiiide from that you need I am truth. I'd also remove  Testing S wis for peace treaty
added those

Offline Rubber band warrior

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1065
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2009, 01:31:20 PM »
0
If you're sticking with royalty and a huge offense, I'd still probably take out John/James and put in a couple other standalone guys, i.e. Nero, Prince of the Air, or maybe a Seven Sons if you want to recur Trembling Demon.

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2009, 01:33:29 PM »
0
yah but I'm using the promo John for a sneak peak of their deck:)

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2009, 01:34:20 PM »
0
Take out John and James for King Jotham, and a stand alone like Nero/King of Tyrus/Prince of this World.

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2009, 01:36:04 PM »
0
You're wasting a turn when you take a peak at their deck.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2009, 01:42:18 PM by SoulSaver »

Offline TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15781
  • Currently undead
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2009, 01:58:38 PM »
0
Take out John and James for King Jotham, and a stand alone like Nero/King of Tyrus/Prince of this World.
+1 king Jotham is awesome.
Not quite a ghost...but not quite not.

Offline New Raven BR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6793
  • P.J.S. May 23rd 1956- May 18th 2012
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Redemption Xtreme League
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2009, 02:25:34 PM »
0
you need et so i'd take out elijah for et
Your biggest competition is YOURSELF

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2009, 05:21:30 PM »
0
ok I took out John/James for King Jotham and ET and PoTWis in thereI just forgot to list him

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2009, 08:14:34 PM »
0
Ah... another deck without a substantial defense.... just try one, Caleb.  :)

Make it 56. Royalty, although is good with a small deck, you want 56... trust me. And I disagree. You want chariot of fire for King Lemuel, so you can discard heroes and still get them back. Take out anything that isn't royalty, except the John starter for two reasons:

Take advantage when a GT deck pwns the defense
Prevent this exact kind of defense  ;)
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline crustpope

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3844
  • Time for those Reds to SHINE!
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #12 on: March 02, 2009, 02:43:49 PM »
0
yeah, basically you are putting all your eggs in one basket.  You are betting that this deck will beat them to the finish line and while it might against most decks, a Garden tomb deck will beat this one almost every time.  with walk in wins.  They would only have to stall you a couple of times to beat you.
This space for rent

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2009, 07:24:59 PM »
0
new defense what you think?

SoulSaver

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2009, 04:08:10 PM »
0
I absolutely HATE the new defense! ::)

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2009, 04:11:53 PM »
0
*aw* why?

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2009, 04:21:42 PM »
0
*aw* why?
because it's not a defence... defence imply's resistence.

on a side note, I'd switch Emperor Otho for Egyptian Warden.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2009, 04:32:18 PM »
0
Replace Love of Money with Dance of Death, in my opinion. Or better yet, Lying unto God.

My reason being Love of Money lets you use more brigades, you only have multi color. Atleast in the case of John or something the other two can be helpful.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2009, 04:53:11 PM »
0
Yes, take out Otho for SSoS, and take out Love of Money for Dance of Death.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2009, 05:03:11 PM »
0
Yes, take out Otho for SSoS, and take out Love of Money for Dance of Death.
Warden is more scary then SSoS. IMO... have a Zimri and a Warden, they'll think twice about attacking you.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #20 on: March 06, 2009, 05:14:39 PM »
0
Yeah, I agree completely with that, but Caleb only has two MC evil enhancements, and I don't suppose he'll be wanting to add any more.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2009, 05:18:00 PM »
0
Yeah, I agree completely with that, but Caleb only has two MC evil enhancements, and I don't suppose he'll be wanting to add any more.
they don't know that ;)

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #22 on: March 09, 2009, 08:28:39 PM »
0
hey would anyone think it'd be a good idea to add Hur/Gifts and plague of frogs(if so what cards should I take out?)

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2009, 09:12:17 PM »
0
Nope. Not everything has to be speed.  :D
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

michael/michaelssword

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #24 on: March 10, 2009, 09:22:06 PM »
0
what about First Fruits and Feast of Trumpets for Torment and SSoS

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #25 on: March 10, 2009, 09:24:20 PM »
0
NO!
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+68)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10674
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #26 on: March 11, 2009, 09:06:49 AM »
0
Nope. Not everything has to be speed.  :D

That's an interesting comment coming from the guy that once told me his purple royalty offense was "speed". ;)
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: My first ever Royalty
« Reply #27 on: March 11, 2009, 05:02:54 PM »
0
I said it drew fast... not that it was speed.  ;) And it didn't have gifts... so it couldn't be speed.  :D
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal