Author Topic: My Deck. (Read 3409 times)

Smokey · « **on:** September 29, 2010, 08:50:03 PM »

Cards in deck: 70
Lost Souls: 10
   Lost Soul
   Lost Soul (anti-burial)
   Lost Soul (Color Guard)
   Lost Soul (female only)
   Lost Soul (hopper)
   Lost Soul (Pigs)
   Lost Soul (punisher)
   Lost Soul (shame)
   Lost Soul (site doubler)
   Lost Souls (2-line)

Lamb Dominants: 1
   Grapes of Wrath

Silver Sites: 1
   Sodom

White Sites: 2
   Herod's Dungeon
   Place of Temptation

Gold Sites: 1
   Chorazin

Blue Sites: 1
   Hormah

Purple Sites: 1
   Prison

Artifacts: 2
   Asherah Pole
   Moses' Rod

Silver Covenant Cards: 1
   I am Sustainer

Silver Heroes: 2
   Arianna
   Kira

Red Heroes: 2
   Abigail
   Adino

Gold Heroes: 1
   Mary of Bethany

Green Heroes: 1
   Midwives

Blue Heroes: 2
   Eve
   Leah

Purple Heroes: 1
   Bathsheba

Multi-Color Hero Enhancements: 1
   Trumpet Blast (Teal)

Silver Hero Enhancements: 5
   A Mighty Blow
   Bound
   Hagar and Angel at Shur
   Three Angels
   Victory

White Hero Enhancements: 3
   Burning Bush
   Submissiveness of Mary
   Withered Hand

Red Hero Enhancements: 2
   David's Staff
   Jael's Nail

Green Hero Enhancements: 6
   Benaiah Snatches a Spear
   David's Sling
   Endurance
   Forcefulness of Isaiah
   Ointment
   Sowing the Seed

Blue Hero Enhancements: 1
   Job Overcomes

Purple Hero Enhancements: 1
   Ezekiel's Stick

Crimson Evil Characters: 7
   Abijah, son of Samuel
   Alexander the Coppersmith
   Babylon the Great
   Creeping Deceiver
   Cubus
   Jezebel
   Whore of Babylon

Gold Evil Characters: 1
   Queen Tahpenes

Pale Green Evil Characters: 2
   King Asnappar
   Women as Snares

Black Evil Characters: 1
   Lot's Daughters

Brown Evil Characters: 2
   Delilah
   Gomer

Multi-Color Evil Characters:4
The Amalekites Slave
The Bear
The Goat with Horn
The Ram with two Horns

Multi-Color Evil Enhancements: 1
   Battering Ram

Gold Evil Enhancements: 1
   Troops Discharged

Gray Evil Enhancements: 3
   Chains
   Hard Bondage
   Water Shaft

I think it could work with some minor adjustments, the offense is a little clunky.

CJSports · « **Reply #1 on:** September 29, 2010, 09:21:43 PM »

What is the point of the deck and how do you win with it, it almost has no dominants.

Smokey · « **Reply #2 on:** September 29, 2010, 09:30:24 PM »

Quote from: CJSports on September 29, 2010, 09:21:43 PM

What is the point of the deck and how do you win with it, it almost has no dominants.

Patience.

CJSports · « **Reply #3 on:** September 29, 2010, 11:15:31 PM »

I don't think the defense is strong enough for that.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #4 on:** September 29, 2010, 11:58:55 PM »

BEST. DECK. EVER.

CJSports · « **Reply #5 on:** September 30, 2010, 06:58:19 AM »

Please explain to me how so.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #6 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:38:25 AM »

First off, it's 70 cards, which is perfect size. also, it has crazy awesome characters, like Abijah and Joel (the sons of Samuel), Whore of Babylon, Gomer, Delilah, Women as Snares, Jezebel, Lot's Daughters, Babylon the Great, Bathesheba, Eve, and the Sodom site.

CJSports · « **Reply #7 on:** September 30, 2010, 02:51:12 PM »

So this is supposed to be a joke deck.

Smokey · « **Reply #8 on:** September 30, 2010, 04:18:28 PM »

Quote from: CJSports on September 30, 2010, 02:51:12 PM

So this is supposed to be a joke deck.

This is my tourney deck bro...

CJSports · « **Reply #9 on:** September 30, 2010, 04:45:40 PM »

I'm sorry if I'm such a n00b but I'm not getting any of this.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #10 on:** September 30, 2010, 04:51:39 PM »

I think it needs a Smokey custom card <3.

Okay, I feel really weird about saying that. Never again.

browarod · « **Reply #11 on:** September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM »

I really don't think this is appropriate....

Red · « **Reply #12 on:** September 30, 2010, 05:25:44 PM »

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM

I really don't think this is appropriate....

They are redemption cards are they not?

browarod · « **Reply #13 on:** September 30, 2010, 05:33:35 PM »

Quote from: Red on September 30, 2010, 05:25:44 PM

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....
They are redemption cards are they not?

Indeed. But the theme is not something that should be focused on.

Red · « **Reply #14 on:** September 30, 2010, 05:35:08 PM »

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:33:35 PM

Quote from: Red on September 30, 2010, 05:25:44 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....
They are redemption cards are they not?
Indeed. But the theme is not something that should be focused on.

It's a joke. I've did a boards deck with that them before and got -1 to obivlion.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #15 on:** September 30, 2010, 06:44:48 PM »

add a Lewd Men.

CJSports · « **Reply #16 on:** September 30, 2010, 06:59:54 PM »

I think I finally get this thread.....

Master_Chi · « **Reply #17 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:06:38 PM »

Quote from: Ring Wraith on September 30, 2010, 06:44:48 PM

add a Lewd Men.

And Protection of Angels. X(

TheJaylor · « **Reply #18 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:09:21 PM »

red heroes, no buckler,?

Master_Chi · « **Reply #19 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:18:50 PM »

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on September 30, 2010, 07:09:21 PM

red heroes, no buckler,?

Buckler good with non-matching brigades. Turn this into T2 and add about 30 of them.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #20 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:25:35 PM »

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 30, 2010, 07:18:50 PM

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on September 30, 2010, 07:09:21 PM
red heroes, no buckler,?

Buckler good with non-matching brigades. Turn this into T2 and add about 5 of them.

The M · « **Reply #21 on:** September 30, 2010, 08:06:41 PM »

Take out color-guard.
you actually have some sites.

Smokey · « **Reply #22 on:** September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM »

Quote from: The M on September 30, 2010, 08:06:41 PM

Take out color-guard.
you actually have some sites.

Why? That's extremely counter-productive.

Quote from: KoalaKingoFA on September 30, 2010, 07:09:21 PM

red heroes, no buckler,?

Buckler is bad, I think it was rude that they didn't reprint it this expantion TBH.

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM

I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?

Quote from: Master_Chi on September 30, 2010, 07:06:38 PM

Quote from: Ring Wraith on September 30, 2010, 06:44:48 PM
add a Lewd Men.

And Protection of Angels. X(

No.

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on September 30, 2010, 04:51:39 PM

I think it needs a Smokey custom card <3.

Okay, I feel really weird about saying that. Never again.

I was accually considering adding it, but my custom card doesn't work without a 4 - 5 card set-up.

browarod · « **Reply #23 on:** September 30, 2010, 08:41:32 PM »

Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?

I think it's pretty self-evident.

Smokey · « **Reply #24 on:** September 30, 2010, 08:44:55 PM »

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 08:41:32 PM

Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?
I think it's pretty self-evident.

evidently not.

browarod · « **Reply #25 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:58:49 PM »

Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:44:55 PM

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 08:41:32 PM
Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?
I think it's pretty self-evident.

evidently not.

Evidently you know exactly what I mean and don't want to admit it considering the nature of this forum

.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #26 on:** October 01, 2010, 12:40:48 AM »

You need to add Women in the Epah.

Arch Angel · « **Reply #27 on:** October 01, 2010, 07:47:51 AM »

My original incarnation of this deck is better. We should actually test them against each other at some point.

CJSports · « **Reply #28 on:** October 01, 2010, 03:02:35 PM »

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 10:58:49 PM

Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:44:55 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 08:41:32 PM
Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?
I think it's pretty self-evident.

evidently not.
Evidently you know exactly what I mean and don't want to admit it considering the nature of this forum .

Well why don't you tell the rest of us because I think some of us are clueless.

Smokey · « **Reply #29 on:** October 01, 2010, 03:10:36 PM »

Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 10:58:49 PM

Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:44:55 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 08:41:32 PM
Quote from: Smokey on September 30, 2010, 08:27:04 PM
Quote from: browarod on September 30, 2010, 05:22:03 PM
I really don't think this is appropriate....

Why?
I think it's pretty self-evident.
evidently not.
Evidently you know exactly what I mean and don't want to admit it considering the nature of this forum .

I know what you're reffering to, I don't see how it's inappropriate

Quote from: Arch Angel on October 01, 2010, 07:47:51 AM

My original incarnation of this deck is better. We should actually test them against each other at some point.

We don't have time to talk anymore, much less play a children's card game.

lightningninja · « **Reply #30 on:** October 01, 2010, 03:40:37 PM »

Some of these I definitely don't understand (Kira and Arianna, for instance), but you need King David. And Bashtheba.

News:

Author Topic: My Deck. (Read 3409 times)

Warrior_Monk

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!

browarod

browarod

Warrior_Monk

Warrior_Monk

browarod

browarod