Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Type 1 Deck Advice => Topic started by: cookie monster on March 06, 2012, 05:56:36 AM

Title: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: cookie monster on March 06, 2012, 05:56:36 AM
I am thinking of making a deck that is based on ignore.
Here are the main cards of the idea:

Book of the Covenant  (P)

I Am Truth  (AW)

I Am Love  (AW)

I will add more protection for these cards, and more battle winners, but I was thinking that this combo could build a nice small effective offence.

I would like to build a deck from this, but what defense would be best?

Thank you,

God Bless!
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: Nameless on March 06, 2012, 08:37:13 AM
Except one says "ignore" and the other says "ignores".
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: cookie monster on March 06, 2012, 10:25:25 AM
Except one says "ignore" and the other says "ignores".

Does this matter? what if a card says both? ???
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: cardsofmanykinds on March 06, 2012, 10:28:19 AM
just put those cards in a TGT deck.
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: LordZardeck on March 06, 2012, 10:30:34 AM
Except one says "ignore" and the other says "ignores".

Actually, "ignore" is contained within "ignores" so should it still work?
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: SomeKittens on March 06, 2012, 10:36:09 AM
Except one says "ignore" and the other says "ignores".

Actually, "ignore" is contained within "ignores" so should it still work?
Nope, it was ruled that these are two different things.

For ignore, just go generic TGT.
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: lp670sv on March 06, 2012, 10:37:08 AM
Only in redemption can adding an S make it a completely different meaning. Ready to flip tables now.
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: cookie monster on March 06, 2012, 10:41:08 AM
I would like this idea to be more anti-meta then just generic TGT.
Title: Re: Ignore deck Idea
Post by: Chronic Apathy on March 06, 2012, 10:46:20 AM
The problem is your original idea doesn't work, due to the difference between "ignore" and "ignores".
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal