Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Deck Building & Design => Type 1 Deck Advice => Topic started by: Chronic Apathy on December 18, 2011, 03:19:03 PM
-
I played this deck for two weeks of ROOT, and played a slightly modified version of it at the Chambersburg, PA district tournament that took first in T12P and tied for third in T1MP. I'm retiring it for a while since it's getting boring, but I like so much I definitely might look at picking it up again when the serious tournament season comes around. Any suggestions or thoughts?
Cards in deck: 50
Lost Souls: 8
Lost Soul (hopper)
Lost Soul (N.T. only)
Lost Soul (revealer)
Lost Soul (shame)
Lost Soul (shuffler)
Lost Soul (Shut Door)
Lost Soul (Wanderer)
Lost Souls (2-line)
Lamb Dominants: 4
Angel of the Lord
Grapes of Wrath
New Jerusalem
Son of God
Grim Reaper Dominants: 3
Christian Martyr
Falling Away
Mayhem
Fortresses: 3
Fishing Boat
Herod's Temple
The Garden Tomb
Artifacts: 3
Four-Drachma Coin
Lampstand of the Sanctuary
Unholy Writ
Purple Covenant Cards: 1
The New Covenant (Bread and Wine)
Multi-Color Heroes: 1
Simon the Zealot (Red/Purple)
White Heroes: 5
Joanna
Mary Magdalene
Mary the Mother of James
Salome
Susanna
Red Heroes: 1
Peter
Purple Heroes: 5
Bartholomew (Nathanael)
John
Matthew (Levi)
Philip
Thomas
Multi-Color Hero Enhancements: 2
Passover Hymn (Purple/White)
Pentecost
White Hero Enhancements: 4
Consider the Lilies
'He Is Risen'
No Need for Spices
Words of Encouragement
Red Hero Enhancements: 1
Mustering for War
Purple Hero Enhancements: 3
Authority of Christ
My Lord and My God
Reach of Desperation
Gray Evil Characters: 1
Sabbath Breaker
Brown Evil Characters: 2
Gomer
Uzzah
Brown Evil Enhancements: 1
Haman's Plot
-
I've found First Fruits to be really handy. Is there a reason you went with No need for Spices over magnificat?
-
I've found First Fruits to be really handy. Is there a reason you went with No need for Spices over magnificat?
Yeah, I wanted to add First Fruits and kept forgetting. I'd probably take NNFS out for it, which I originally went with over Magnificat since it's more likely to win a battle if my opponent is banding.
-
It seems like you could have issues getting access against a site deck if boat was buried in your deck or if it was discarded with ASA. Did you ever run into sites?
-
Nope. The only decks that use sites at all are Israelite Royalty decks, and if I do run into one of those with Boat buried (since the vast majority of the time they won't have Assyrian splash), I can turn up the speed with Matt, Susie, and the set-aside enhancements, and rush through the deck quickly.
-
I've removed the nonsense and bickering from this topic. I pray all of us will think about how our posts might appear to others before we submit them.
:angel:
-
I would love to have a match with this against my "balance" deck. I am very surprised your defense held, makes me wish I had been able to go to the PA tourney.
-
I've made a few adjustments to the deck since then, but this will probably be what I use for whatever the next tournament is. I'd love to play with you whenever I come down next.