why Malchus? take him out for Matthias.
(oh, and thanks for sticking in an Andrew.)
IMO, Ammy Slave>Malchus. it's also another character to play Plot on.why Malchus? take him out for Matthias.
(oh, and thanks for sticking in an Andrew.)
Lost soul generation. If you haven't figured it out, the main goal is to abuse Thaddeus asap, hence the speed. My drawing thus far as been impeccable (and I only got Fishing Boat off in one game).
you can't play plot on malchusright. I was saying that Ammy Slave is better because you can play plot on him.
I don't think the offense has enough umph. I only see 3 battle winners, 4 with angel of the lord, and that's still a far cry from a battle won because a martyr could b dropped. I would put in a couple more.obviously you don't get the strategy of this deck
I am really liking the idea of a walking on water addition. I think it's a extremely underrated card that would go very well in a deck like this.
I'm still surprised at how few NT decks I've seen without Wash Basin. Why wouldn't you want to discard evil cards from the bottom of your opponent's deck or possibly put Lost Souls on top?
IMO, Ammy Slave>Malchus. it's also another character to play Plot on.why Malchus? take him out for Matthias.
(oh, and thanks for sticking in an Andrew.)
Lost soul generation. If you haven't figured it out, the main goal is to abuse Thaddeus asap, hence the speed. My drawing thus far as been impeccable (and I only got Fishing Boat off in one game).
I don't think the offense has enough umph. I only see 3 battle winners, 4 with angel of the lord, and that's still a far cry from a battle won because a martyr could b dropped. I would put in a couple more.
i attack with philip banded to bartThere's your problem: you attacked with someone other than Thaddeus. ::)
I like this deck. Seems very balanced and viable. the defense is all I would change, but it looks good also :D
Lol true it isnt balanced evilly and goodly. lol.it is grammarly though.