Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Rawrlolsauce! on November 01, 2010, 08:40:05 PM
-
This isn't too important beings it isn't a very good card, but....
Does the Tartan
-Negate all (protect abilities on heroes) and (fortresses)
-Negate all (protect abilities on heroes) and (protect abilities on fortresses)."
or other?
The Tartan (FF)
Type: Evil Char. • Brigade: Pale Green • Ability: 10 / 7 • Class: Warrior • Special Ability: Negate all protect abilities on Heroes and Fortresses. You may capture a Philistine or discard an Ashdod Site. • Identifiers: OT Male Human, Commander (Assyria), Fought Earthly Battle • Verse: Isaiah 20:1 • Availability: Faith of our Fathers booster packs (None)
-
it should be the second one...
-
it is the second option
-
-Negate all (protect abilities on heroes) and (protect abilities on fortresses)."
-
Do you have any references/precedence or are you guessing?
-
guessing ;D
-
simple grammar rules...
-
simple grammar rules...
Although normally I'd say that makes no sense, I'll say "Redemption has gotten into the habit of being repetitive when distinguishing. (IE: Job). If it wanted to do the second it should say exactly what I typed, minus the parentheses." instead.
-
i agree with you for better clarification.
-
"Heroes and Fortresses" is the object of the prepositional phrase "on Heroes and Fortresses" which equates it to "on Heroes and on Fortresses". So it's the second option.
For comparison, Job says: "Protect Job from discard and capture abilities." So in this case, "from discard and capture abilities" equates to "from discard and from capture abilities".
That's how I'd rule it.
-
Ohhhh... mannnn....
Job protected from discard and discard abilities....
Ohhhh... mannnn....