Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: lott750 on August 04, 2014, 06:57:37 PM

Title: Scarlet Line and I Am Love
Post by: lott750 on August 04, 2014, 06:57:37 PM
So the wiki says about scarlet line: play as female heroes ignore male evil characters. I Am Love paraphrased: ...return white enhancement with "ignore" in the ability text...

Does the "errata" on scarlet line allow it to be search for by I Am Love? Not a tremendous deal one way or the other, just wondering if the "play as" portion of the wiki changes these sort of interactions.
Title: Re: Scarlet Line and I Am Love
Post by: Redoubter on August 04, 2014, 07:04:15 PM
It must actually have the word "ignores" (not even "ignore," it has to be SPECIFICALLY "ignores").  No play-as changes that.  It is not an actual errata, just something to tell you how to treat that ability (as it is an ignore).

So no, I Am Love (http://redemption.wikia.com/wiki/I_Am_Love_(AW)) cannot recur Scarlet Line (http://redemption.wikia.com/wiki/Scarlet_Line_(Wo)).
Title: Re: Scarlet Line and I Am Love
Post by: lott750 on August 04, 2014, 09:50:55 PM
I thought it could be either way, depending on how it was intended to work. Restricting it to specifically the word "ignores" (yes I am aware this is exactly how the card reads) certainly makes I Am Love close to worthless, but it could have been a bit overpowered otherwise (though I think the non-warrior class human restriction limited its uses enough.)
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal