Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Red on May 20, 2010, 07:59:14 PM

Title: Proactive.
Post by: Red on May 20, 2010, 07:59:14 PM
Proactive stances on combos is not ok.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 20, 2010, 08:16:29 PM
Why not? Combos are the terrorists of card games.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Red on May 20, 2010, 08:18:12 PM
Why not? Combos are the terrorists of card games.
lol Josh Kopp defending a anti-fun rule. I personlly think that the originaltartiy that is displayed in combo should not be punished.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 20, 2010, 08:19:41 PM
Not at all. I hate the rule, I just don't think we need a pro-active stance vs terrorism.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Red on May 20, 2010, 08:26:12 PM
Not at all. I hate the rule, I just don't think we need a pro-active stance vs terrorism.
That was my opinion so ignore that.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 20, 2010, 08:46:12 PM
If you want me to ignore it, don't post it.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: SomeKittens on May 20, 2010, 08:48:16 PM
PHILISTINES ARE TERRORISTS!!!  We must be more proactively proactive before they escape their prison cells cleverly disguised as proactive Redemption cards!
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: COUNTER_SNIPER on May 20, 2010, 08:50:02 PM
At the time, we were considered by the Jewish leadership and Roman Empire to be terrorists...  According to the British, we were terrorists.  It's all a matter of perspective  ;)  ;D :laugh:
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Bryon on May 20, 2010, 10:22:57 PM
Proactive stances on combos is not ok.
That's "are not" not "is not."  And... you are entitled to your opinion.  :)
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Alex_Olijar on May 20, 2010, 10:23:33 PM
Proactive>Reactive.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: COUNTER_SNIPER on May 20, 2010, 10:26:38 PM
In the words of a homicide detective I once knew: "Action is faster than reaction."  Although I would like to add, action is riskier than reaction and may have larger consequences...  ;D
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: YourMathTeacher on May 20, 2010, 10:38:08 PM
The title fooled me. I thought this thread was about a new performance-enhancing drug (which is known to be more heavily abused in the NFL than MLB).
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: SomeKittens on May 20, 2010, 10:43:37 PM
I sincerely doubt there'll be a "performance enhancing drug" scandal at Nationals
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: YourMathTeacher on May 20, 2010, 10:44:48 PM
I sincerely doubt there'll be a "performance enhancing drug" scandal at Nationals

You obviously have not seen the "Mountain Dew" card.   ;)
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Prof Underwood on May 20, 2010, 10:47:28 PM
The title fooled me. I thought this thread was about a new performance-enhancing drug (which is known to be more heavily abused in the NFL than MLB).
I got that :)
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: SomeKittens on May 20, 2010, 10:50:40 PM
I sincerely doubt there'll be a "performance enhancing drug" scandal at Nationals

You obviously have not seen the "Mountain Dew" card.   ;)
Isn't the point not to have the Mountain Dew card, but to make sure all your opponents cards become Mountain Dew cards?  I'm sure I saw something about "The Flood" in the REG.
Title: Re: Proactive.
Post by: Alex_Olijar on May 20, 2010, 11:00:30 PM
The title fooled me. I thought this thread was about a new performance-enhancing drug (which is known to be more heavily abused in the NFL than MLB).

It's ok YMT. I thought this was going to be a thread about some acne cream for my beauty marks, but I appear to have missed the mark as well.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal