Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Sean on October 17, 2020, 05:08:47 PM

Title: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Sean on October 17, 2020, 05:08:47 PM
If my opponent has Storehouse in play and I make a rescue and play Primary Objective, can my opponent discard their hand or would this be an automatic rescue?

Spoiler (hover to show)

Spoiler (hover to show)
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Reth on October 17, 2020, 05:23:10 PM
Since opponents hand is protected this would work towards an "automatic rescue". Nevertheless opponent could still negate Prim. Objevtive or add characters to battle helping out (via Gates of Hell or similar cards) if those characters would e.g. negate your GE or allowing opponent to play sth. or similar.
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on October 17, 2020, 05:45:55 PM
The original anti-storehouse card
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Sean on October 17, 2020, 07:18:45 PM
Since opponents hand is protected this would work towards an "automatic rescue". Nevertheless opponent could still negate Prim. Objevtive or add characters to battle helping out (via Gates of Hell or similar cards) if those characters would e.g. negate your GE or allowing opponent to play sth. or similar.
True, but it wouldn't matter if it was the last Redeemed Soul to win.  The Hero may or may not hand over initiative either.
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Asahel24601 on October 18, 2020, 02:16:07 AM
So, Primary Objective, Lamb's Righeousness, and Eternal Covenant makes three (ish, Lamb's restrictive) redeemed souls assuming Storehouse is in play. John, the Apocalyptist makes Lamb's and Primary Objective CBN and can play them. Add Rev Angel's Speed and a Namaan's Servant Girl Captive Princes for consistency's sake and I think we have a cheese deck in the making.
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Reth on October 18, 2020, 09:10:04 AM
I did not get how Eternal Covenant contributes to "cheesy redeemed souls" besides the fact it takes a human Hero from DC pile into play. Also Lamb's R. and Eternal Covenant do not interact/benefit from any storehouse in play. But maybe I missed sth. ...
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on October 18, 2020, 09:38:28 AM
So, Primary Objective, Lamb's Righeousness, and Eternal Covenant makes three (ish, Lamb's restrictive) redeemed souls assuming Storehouse is in play. John, the Apocalyptist makes Lamb's and Primary Objective CBN and can play them. Add Rev Angel's Speed and a Namaan's Servant Girl Captive Princes for consistency's sake and I think we have a cheese deck in the making.


Josiah and I debated using the "alt" rescue cards as our teams strategy at Nationals. There's enough of them now for it to be effective.
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Gabe on October 18, 2020, 11:06:04 AM
I did not get how Eternal Covenant contributes to "cheesy redeemed souls" besides the fact it takes a human Hero from DC pile into play. Also Lamb's R. and Eternal Covenant do not interact/benefit from any storehouse in play. But maybe I missed sth. ...

He meant Eternal Inheritance. Same set. Similar name. Most of us have mixed those up at least once.  ;)
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Asahel24601 on October 18, 2020, 12:47:28 PM
I did not get how Eternal Covenant contributes to "cheesy redeemed souls" besides the fact it takes a human Hero from DC pile into play. Also Lamb's R. and Eternal Covenant do not interact/benefit from any storehouse in play. But maybe I missed sth. ...

He meant Eternal Inheritance. Same set. Similar name. Most of us have mixed those up at least once.  ;)
Yeah, Eternal Inheretance, not covenant. Dangit, I thought I caught all those mistakes....
Title: Re: Primary Objective and Storehouse
Post by: Reth on October 18, 2020, 01:05:21 PM
He meant Eternal Inheritance. Same set. Similar name. Most of us have mixed those up at least once.  ;)
;D
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal