Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: The Warrior on September 18, 2009, 05:54:11 PM

Title: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: The Warrior on September 18, 2009, 05:54:11 PM

Type: Evil Char. • Brigade: Black • Ability: 6 / 8 • Class: None • Special Ability: Character is immune to all angels except Michael and Gabriel. • Identifiers: OT Male Demon • Verse: Ezekiel 28:2 • Availability: Warriors booster packs (Uncommon)

is he immune to Aotl?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: SirTimothy on September 18, 2009, 05:56:51 PM

No it is not a silver brigade hero.

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: SirNobody on September 18, 2009, 05:57:39 PM

Hey,

"Angels" is a type of character.  Angel of the Lord is not a character, so it does not qualify as an angel.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: The Warrior on September 18, 2009, 05:58:33 PM

Errta? the Warriors Pot?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: lightningninja on September 18, 2009, 06:34:46 PM

Prince of Persia and Judas Iscariot are the only ecs immune to aotl. Did you mean prince of persia and not prince of tyrus?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: The Warrior on September 18, 2009, 06:44:55 PM

no -_-

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: lightningninja on September 18, 2009, 06:49:53 PM

Well then I agree with the above posts. ;D

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: The Warrior on September 18, 2009, 06:52:10 PM

ty
Sirnobody
sirtimithy
and
FireNinja

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 21, 2009, 01:09:39 AM

I agree, but not for that reason. You can't be Immune to Dominants.

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: lightningninja on September 21, 2009, 01:10:49 AM

Judas? Prince of Persia?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 21, 2009, 01:25:23 AM

You can be immune to types of abilities, like Discard, and Protected from Dominants.

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: lightningninja on September 21, 2009, 04:30:57 PM

Ah, I see. But I don't think it's a rule that you can't be immune to dominants. Is there something like that in the REG?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on September 21, 2009, 04:35:45 PM

Amaziah, the Ungodly Priest is the closest I can get to "Immune to dominants."

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: Minister Polarius on September 21, 2009, 06:27:13 PM

Quote from: lightningninja on September 21, 2009, 04:30:57 PM

Ah, I see. But I don't think it's a rule that you can't be immune to dominants. Is there something like that in the REG?

I think it's in the definition of "Immunity."

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: SirNobody on September 21, 2009, 07:28:41 PM

Hey,

In theory you are "immune" to cards; you are "protected" from abilities.  So you shouldn't ever be "immune to discard" (although there are some old cards that are worded that way).  Also if a card has 0 strength (which is the case with all dominants) being immune to the card is effectively the same as being protected from the ability on the card.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: lightningninja on September 21, 2009, 11:33:48 PM

So it is possible to be immune from dominants? We just haven't made a card that does that yet?

Title: Re: Pot/Aotl?
Post by: SirNobody on September 22, 2009, 02:14:27 AM

Hey,

Quote from: lightningninja on September 21, 2009, 11:33:48 PM

So it is possible to be immune from dominants? We just haven't made a card that does that yet?

A card that cannot be targeted by a dominant in general would be protected from dominants not immune to them.  The only way I could imagine a card being immune to dominants would be in an ability that said something like "immune to all good cards."

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly