Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Isildur on August 29, 2010, 09:34:49 PM

Title: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Isildur on August 29, 2010, 09:34:49 PM: Does any one know if this card is still broken or not? I never remember this getting resolved in the thread it was brought up in....

And what was J Tower errata'd to exactly?

Thanks!
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: TheJaylor on August 29, 2010, 10:22:54 PM: since when was it broken? please inform me of this brokenness.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: BubbleBoy on August 29, 2010, 11:09:45 PM: Whatever the ruling on this turns out to be, we need to make it consistent with Strengthening Angel.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:05:05 PM: j-tower is a protect now.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Smokey on August 31, 2010, 04:08:57 PM: Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:05:05 PM
j-tower is a protect now.

J tower is a restrict now, and restrict won't be officially defined until the new REG comes out.

Plauged with diseases is permanent if played as an enhancement, Is that what you're reffering to?
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:11:34 PM: Quote from: Smokey on August 31, 2010, 04:08:57 PM
Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:05:05 PM
j-tower is a protect now.

J tower is a restrict now, and restrict won't be officially defined until the new REG comes out.

Plauged with diseases is permanent if played as an enhancement, Is that what you're reffering to?

I did a post on it a little bit ago and the PTB said protect i believe. lemme find it
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:20:46 PM: http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/index.php?topic=22001.0 (http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/index.php?topic=22001.0)
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Smokey on August 31, 2010, 04:36:01 PM: That thread is out-dated, theres a more recent post by Bryon about it. Also,
Quote
Play As: Restrict opponents' from removing cards from holder’s deck. Deck may still be searched, revealed, and/or shuffled
.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:42:36 PM: Quote from: Smokey on August 31, 2010, 04:36:01 PM
That thread is out-dated, theres a more recent post by Bryon about it. Also,
Quote
Play As: Restrict opponents' from removing cards from holder’s deck. Deck may still be searched, revealed, and/or shuffled
.

EDIT: So by means of Redemption, what is the definition of "Restrict"?
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: BubbleBoy on August 31, 2010, 05:40:22 PM: Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:42:36 PM
So by means of Redemption, what is the definition of "Restrict"?
It's like a negate that affects game functions rather than card abilities.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: browarod on August 31, 2010, 08:17:23 PM: Quote from: BubbleBoy on August 31, 2010, 05:40:22 PM
Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:42:36 PM
So by means of Redemption, what is the definition of "Restrict"?
It's like a negate that affects game functions rather than card abilities.
It seems more like a prevent of functions than a negate.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on August 31, 2010, 08:27:36 PM: For an example, Darius Decree restricts opponents from playing good enhancements if no EC is in battle.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 11:15:25 PM: Quote from: BubbleBoy on August 31, 2010, 05:40:22 PM
Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:42:36 PM
So by means of Redemption, what is the definition of "Restrict"?
It's like a negate that affects game functions rather than card abilities.

So would W@tW & HT still work since it is a restrict or no? Even with cbn status...
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: browarod on September 01, 2010, 12:15:33 AM: Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 11:15:25 PM
Quote from: BubbleBoy on August 31, 2010, 05:40:22 PM
Quote from: 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips on August 31, 2010, 04:42:36 PM
So by means of Redemption, what is the definition of "Restrict"?
It's like a negate that affects game functions rather than card abilities.

So would W@tW & HT still work since it is a restrict or no? Even with cbn status...
Restrict is not negating, it's simply reducing the number of targets. So CBN means nothing since it's not trying to negate.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Gabe on September 01, 2010, 12:48:28 AM: Jerusalem Tower is a protect now. The was a communication gap between the REG update and the final decision that it will be worded as a protect.
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Master_Chi on September 01, 2010, 09:12:30 AM: Quote from: BrianGabe on September 01, 2010, 12:48:28 AM
Jerusalem Tower is a protect now. The was a communication gap between the REG update and the final decision that it will be worded as a protect.

When is the new REG scheduled for release?
Title: Re: Plauged with Diseases
Post by: Prof Underwood on September 01, 2010, 04:16:28 PM: Quote from: BrianGabe on September 01, 2010, 12:48:28 AM
Jerusalem Tower is a protect now.
+1 This is also the latest ruling that I am aware of.