Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: JSB23 on August 28, 2010, 12:34:08 PM
-
Anybody have a picture?
-
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.redemptionreg.com%2FREG%2FLinkedDocuments%2FPithom%2520%28P%29.gif&hash=d73ebf00ecf047637b9618029919cba71e5ce25b)
-
thats goood
-
Muwahaha :maul:
-
when are we gonna be able to choose this one as a choice for a promo this season?
-
i hope we can
-
The following Redemption® cards are considered Egyptians:
• (Good): Midwives (G), Midwives (Wo), and Pharaoh's Daughter (Wo)
• (Evil): Egyptian Archer (Ki), Egyptian Charioteers (H), Egyptian Horsemen (H), Egyptian Warden (FF), Egyptian Wise Men (Pa), Huge Egyptian (FF), Jambres (Pi), Jannes (Pi), King Shishak (Ki), King So (Ki), Pharaoh (AL), Pharaoh (AU), Pharaoh (DL), Pharaoh (DU), Pharaoh (H), Pharaoh (L), Pharaoh (UL), Pharaoh Hophra (Pi), Pharaoh Neco (Ki), Pharaoh's Magicians (Pa), Potiphar (Pi), Potiphar's Wife (Wo), Potiphera, Priest of On (Pi), Queen Tahpenes (RA), Task Master (AL), Task Master (L), Taskmaster (AU), Taskmaster (DL), Taskmaster (DU), Taskmaster (H), Taskmaster (UL), The Amalekites' Slave (RA),
-
Caleb like this, especially with Egyptian Heroless.......
-
Moses should be ruled Egyptian. He was adopted by the Pharaoh's Daughter.
-
The following Redemption® cards are considered Egyptians:
• (Good): Midwives (G), Midwives (Wo), and Pharaoh's Daughter (Wo)
• (Evil): Egyptian Archer (Ki), Egyptian Charioteers (H), Egyptian Horsemen (H), Egyptian Warden (FF), Egyptian Wise Men (Pa), Huge Egyptian (FF), Jambres (Pi), Jannes (Pi), King Shishak (Ki), King So (Ki), Pharaoh (AL), Pharaoh (AU), Pharaoh (DL), Pharaoh (DU), Pharaoh (H), Pharaoh (L), Pharaoh (UL), Pharaoh Hophra (Pi), Pharaoh Neco (Ki), Pharaoh's Magicians (Pa), Potiphar (Pi), Potiphar's Wife (Wo), Potiphera, Priest of On (Pi), Queen Tahpenes (RA), Task Master (AL), Task Master (L), Taskmaster (AU), Taskmaster (DL), Taskmaster (DU), Taskmaster (H), Taskmaster (UL), The Amalekites' Slave (RA),
what about jacabed moses's mother is she egyption ???
-
I would say yes, but that would necessitate ruling the Moses, Miram, Aaron, and possible Women of Israel and Elders of Israel as egyptian as well.
-
what about jacabed moses's mother is she egyption ???
Jochebed, Aaron, Miriam, as well as many other Exodus characters were Egyptian slaves, not technically Egyptians. It depends on how Slaves get ruled.
Moses, however, was adopted. He was not a slave.
-
Are female players immune to this card?
If MKC wears a dress, is s/he immune to this card?
Is Faithful Servant immune to this card?
-
Are female players immune to this card?
If MKC wears a dress, is s/he immune to this card?
Is Faithful Servant immune to this card?
1) The card incurs that female players are not affected by it.
2) removed
3) No.
Bonus: I would hate to face RR's Egyptian Heroless with Pithom added in.
-
i should make a speed deck with Pharoah's Daughter and Pithom in it.
-
i should make a speed deck with Pharoah's Daughter and Pithom in it.
Phillies + Siegeworks = bye-bye Pithom......
-
O.T. evil fortress, one of the easiest things in-game to discard.
-
The card incurs that female players are not affected by it.
That's sexist. I demand a card that dudes are immune from!
-
Are female players immune to this card?
If MKC wears a dress, is s/he immune to this card?
Is Faithful Servant immune to this card?
1. The masculine pronoun is acceptable if the gender in question is unknown.
2. MKC is awesome.
3. You're awesome.
-
Remember that we have little kids here.
Carry on.
-
Remember that we have little kids here.
Carry on.
( please dont not visualize the following as angry for it not ment to be a 6/6 brown briagde EC the negates and exchanges heros) this is what annoys me : if ANYTHING is the LEAST bit mature moderators just use the exuse that "there are little kids on here." even though they (the supposed kids) HAVEN'T POSTED ONCE.
On a Related Not i think that Access to Open discussion should be judged on Maturity not age (though age should be be taken in consideration, it should just not the deciding factor)
-
It angers me that even though this is a family forum, all of the members I have seen would be able to hold mature conversations so this should not have been deleted.
On an unrelated related note I think that cccess to open discussion should be judged not only by age, but maturity as well.
This is what a contributing post looks like.
-
Remember that we have little kids here.
Carry on.
( please dont not visualize the following as angry for it not ment to be a 6/6 brown briagde EC the negates and exchanges heros) this is what annoys me : if ANYTHING is the LEAST bit mature moderators just use the exuse that "there are little kids on here." even though they (the supposed kids) HAVEN'T POSTED ONCE.
On a Related Not i think that Access to Open discussion should be judged on Maturity not age (though age should be be taken in consideration, it should just not the deciding factor)
My kids often reads the boards over my shoulder. Of all places, I would think that the family-friendly side of the board would be free from anything I'd rather my kids not be exposed to yet.
I was confused by your last sentence. Were you suggesting that YOU are mature enough for the OD section of the board? Someone who expresses annoyance rather than apologizing when reminded kindly to keep things family-friendly? For someone who is 1910 years old, I'd think you'd show a little more maturity than that. :)
-
exactly what part of this thread isnt family-friendly?
-
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsattlers.org%2Fmickey%2Fculture%2Fclothing%2Fkilts%2Fimages%2F2005-02-charles-in-kilt-1.jpg&hash=0862578141788c43a83df31d80c9c6513ad90530)
Dialogue:
My kilt > your skirt
-
Remember that we have little kids here.
Carry on.
( please dont not visualize the following as angry for it not ment to be a 6/6 brown briagde EC the negates and exchanges heros) this is what annoys me : if ANYTHING is the LEAST bit mature moderators just use the exuse that "there are little kids on here." even though they (the supposed kids) HAVEN'T POSTED ONCE.
The vast majority of people who view a thread don't post on it.
As of now, this thread has 330 views and 16 posters (I may have counted wrong).
Also, I'm thinking that RLKs are less likely to post than veteran, older players.