Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: BubbleBoy on May 08, 2010, 11:09:30 PM

Title: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: BubbleBoy on May 08, 2010, 11:09:30 PM: So, I would like to get a really official, final ruling on this. Does I Am Truth (http://redemptionreg.com/REG/iamtruth.htm) work on enhancements with "ignores" in the SA? This ruling I believe is linked to whether Leprosy (http://redemptionreg.com/REG/leprosy.htm) and Joseph's Brothers' Scheme (http://redemptionreg.com/REG/josephsbrothersscheme.htm) can work with High Places (http://redemptionreg.com/REG/LinkedDocuments/High%20Places%20(TP).gif). I sure hope the answer is yes, because I would like to see all these cards used more (especially Leprosy)...
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Minister Polarius on May 08, 2010, 11:14:05 PM: I doubt it will be. But if it is, I'm making a Gates of Jerusalem deck RIGHT NOW.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: BubbleBoy on May 08, 2010, 11:17:44 PM: Quote from: Minister Polarius on May 08, 2010, 11:14:05 PM
I doubt it will be. But if it is, I'm making a Gates of Jerusalem deck RIGHT NOW.
:miss:
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Minister Polarius on May 08, 2010, 11:22:34 PM: If Jo-Bro's scheme becomes High Places legal, I'll break the game in three seconds flat.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Lamborghini_diablo on May 08, 2010, 11:23:39 PM: Yeah, i think the High places ruling stands firm, it only works with Place, not places, for reasons like Pol stated.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: BubbleBoy on May 08, 2010, 11:25:27 PM: Quote from: Minister Polarius on May 08, 2010, 11:22:34 PM
If Jo-Bro's scheme becomes High Places legal, I'll break the game in three seconds flat.
Not if we make a rule that says characters can only enter battle in the battle phase...which is essentially already a rule with the current card cache.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 08, 2010, 11:27:15 PM: Breaking the game sounds fun.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Sean on May 09, 2010, 12:02:12 PM: Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 08, 2010, 11:27:15 PM
Breaking the game sounds fun.
Eh...its been done.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Red on May 09, 2010, 01:18:51 PM: Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 08, 2010, 11:27:15 PM
Re-breaking the game sounds fun.
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 09, 2010, 07:03:26 PM: Well I've only broken it once so...
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: Red on May 09, 2010, 08:44:56 PM: Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 09, 2010, 07:03:26 PM
Well I've only broken it once so...
RDT breaks it again.(how did you break it?)
Title: Re: Now necessary for deck building purposes...
Post by: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on May 09, 2010, 09:11:43 PM: Doubt and teams. 'nuff said.