Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: The_ARk on September 02, 2010, 05:09:21 PM

Title: Golgotha
Post by: The_ARk on September 02, 2010, 05:09:21 PM: Golgotha us nit considered Roman? I ask because of Nero.

Golgotha (Di)
Type: Site • Brigade: White • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Anytime during battle, you may place a skull icon card from hand or discard pile on Golgotha: N.T. characters of that brigade cannot be ignored. Return that card to its previous location at end of turn. • Identifiers: Jew • Verse: Matthew 27:33 • Availability: Disciples booster packs ()
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Nameless on September 02, 2010, 05:11:32 PM: I don't think so but ask someone that is more experience
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: The_ARk on September 02, 2010, 06:01:45 PM: According to the REG it's not listed as Roman, but it was a Roman execution site.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Nameless on September 02, 2010, 06:03:13 PM: it was a roman execution site.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Master KChief on September 02, 2010, 08:02:24 PM: nice, all tgt decks should be packing emperor nero now.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Red Dragon Thorn on September 02, 2010, 08:04:08 PM: :) Way ahead of you ;) Plus he fits in so well in that miniscule defence :)
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: RTSmaniac on September 02, 2010, 08:09:52 PM: Ouch! bet you wish nobody saw that RDT.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Master KChief on September 02, 2010, 08:11:56 PM: on a complete side note, your avatar is a mtg card rtsmaniac, did you know that? :)
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Professoralstad on September 02, 2010, 08:20:10 PM: I've always assumed that the only Sites that are considered Roman are those within the city of Rome. Otherwise, pretty much all NT sites (and even some OT ones) could be considered Roman, as part of the Roman empire. As much as I might like to see another way to get rid of Golgotha, I don't think Nero will be it.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Master KChief on September 02, 2010, 08:24:39 PM: wait, so you're pro-tgt?

...

SHES A WITCH! BURN HER, BURN HER!
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Professoralstad on September 02, 2010, 09:10:37 PM: Quote from: Master KChief on September 02, 2010, 08:24:39 PM
wait, so you're pro-tgt?

...

SHES A WITCH! BURN HER, BURN HER!

If Golgotha's main purpose in game was as an anti-TGT card, perhaps I would be more in favor of it. But as any T2 player knows (or soon will know) it's far, far more than that.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: Rawrlolsauce! on September 02, 2010, 09:11:34 PM: Golgatha is good with Nathan. Ring Wraith and Lawfuldawg created a really cool Golgatha combo :).
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: The_ARk on September 02, 2010, 11:35:44 PM: Quote from: Professoralstad on September 02, 2010, 08:20:10 PM
I've always assumed that the only Sites that are considered Roman are those within the city of Rome. Otherwise, pretty much all NT sites (and even some OT ones) could be considered Roman, as part of the Roman empire. As much as I might like to see another way to get rid of Golgotha, I don't think Nero will be it.

This is what I want to hear.

It is a perfect site to stop King David from crippling my Emperor deck.
Title: Re: Golgotha
Post by: RTSmaniac on September 03, 2010, 10:51:15 PM: Quote
on a complete side note, your avatar is a mtg card rtsmaniac, did you know that?

What are you talking about? kidding

IONA FTW!

(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2FE1JKw.png&hash=59d343083a76f33f4b736da1ed20a7310678363c)
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimgur.com%2FObVjK.png&hash=d027a9c11340716895ccdfe921b3a6d3e246a42e)