Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: YourMathTeacher on June 09, 2012, 02:09:37 PM
-
Where do we keep the list of Giant-Slayers?
-
Where do we keep the list of Giant-Slayers?
http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/ruling-questions/giant-slayers/ (http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/ruling-questions/giant-slayers/)
-
Which could have been found by googling "giant slayers site:cactusgamedesign.com"
Just a little google-fu for y'all.
-
Which could have been found by googling "giant slayers site:cactusgamedesign.com"
Just a little google-fu for y'all.
Yup, I actually found the list by googling "giant slayers cactusgamedesign.com."
-
What's this "google" thing y'all keep talking about?
-
http://www.google.com/ (http://www.google.com/)
-
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=google (http://lmgtfy.com/?q=google)
-
I do it the old-fashioned way, Read the Bible.
Yeah, I know it's so much of a novel idea, reading the Bible to find information from the Bible. =) (lol)
-
Reading Redemption cards helps, too. I already knew Elhanan, Sibbecai, and Abishai were giant-slayers because their SA says so. ;)
Jonathan (not the son of Saul) is the one I keep forgetting. :-\
Thanks guys! ;D
-
I know one... David!
-
I do it the old-fashioned way, Read the Bible.
Yeah, I know it's so much of a novel idea, reading the Bible to find information from the Bible. =) (lol)
That's crazy talk, megamanlan. If I actually went with what was in the Bible, then both Asherah Pole and Altar of Ahaz (especially Altar as it was specifically built to be placed in the temple) would have to be a temple artifacts.
-
Not true. Temple Artifacts are items that were made to represent something that God wanted in the Temple to note to some kind of future event ( almost all of them noted to Christ) both of those are Idols which even though they were in the Temple did not belong so they are not Temple Artifacts.
-
have to agree with megamanlan on that this one
-
I think MJB was trying to be playful, just like I was about Google. ;)
-
I think MJB was trying to be playful, just like I was about Google. ;)
True that. I thought starting with "That's crazy talk" made the smiley unnecessary.
-
I was tired when I posted that so it didn't notice the joke, lol.