Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Ammian on November 11, 2010, 12:59:43 PM
-
Maybe there's something in the REG I missed...
If you gain first strike through, say, Godspeed, and then your opponent gains first strike through, say, Ferocious attack, what does that mean? Do the first strikes just cancel each other out? In that case, aren't those cards being indirectly negated? I'm confused ...what happens?
Wondering yet again,
Ammian
-
edit---- never mind, wrong
-
Gotcha ...thanks! That's what I thought.
Blessings and peace,
Ammian
-
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.
-
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.
I also think that I remember it this way. (Unless you're using that one "first strike" card that says to negate all other first strikes, or regardless of other first strikes, or something like that).
-
I thought it was the first First Strike to enter battle is the one that works.
I also think that I remember it this way. (Unless you're using that one "first strike" card that says to negate all other first strikes, or regardless of other first strikes, or something like that).
Godspeed and Ferocious Attack is not that one poorly worded card...
-
This is why we need a second strike ability.
-
Nah, I think we need a preemptive strike. And instead of banding, we could have a coalition of the willing :)
-
awww.... they get infinite initiative if I am oblivious to them... ;D