Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: SignoftheStar on April 03, 2017, 05:06:18 PM
-
Both prints of Glittering Sword quote Deuteronomy 32:41, which comes from the Song of Moses.
Shouldn't Glittering Sword therefore involve music?
-
Sure. The real question is, why would anyone use Glittering Sword?
-
Sure. The real question is, why would anyone use Glittering Sword?
Booster draft.
-
Sure. The real question is, why would anyone use Glittering Sword?
Waaaaayyyy back in the day I liked using Glittering Sword on King Sennacherib because of his First Strike, but these days it's fairly non-playable.
Even so, why would it even matter? Cards like Music Leader that interact with "musical" cards typically specify "good cards that involve music."
-
Wrong Glittering weapon. Spear is evil, Sword is good.
-
Wrong Glittering weapon. Spear is evil, Sword is good.
:doh:
And that's what posting answers to ruling questions after a 16 hour work day will do for ya...
-
Sure. The real question is, why would anyone use Glittering Sword?
I dunno. With Musicians, their Chambers, and now a Reserve, I don't see how Glittering Sword couldn't be an option in the future.
-
An OT Purple battlewinner (granted, a conditional one) that can be played off of Throne and recurred by Music Leader is legit. Still, it probably wouldn't make the cut in most Throne/Musician decks.
-
An OT Purple battlewinner (granted, a conditional one) that can be played off of Throne and recurred by Music Leader is legit. Still, it probably wouldn't make the cut in most Throne/Musician decks.
I actually did use two of them in a T2 Throne deck (the one I played at the T2 Only this year in fact) as I wanted another battle winner besides Valley of Salt and Counsel of Abigail--especially since Valley can get tossed by Coliseum. 8)