Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => Ruling Questions => Topic started by: Korunks on November 16, 2010, 10:40:38 AM

Title: CBN vs Immunity
Post by: Korunks on November 16, 2010, 10:40:38 AM
I was perusing some older threads and a statement was made in a discussion about ANB vs Immunity that went uncontested.  the statement was:


This is why Cannot be Negated can be used on a Immune card (because Y still targets X but the immunity can't stop it) but doesn't work on Protected cards (because Y can't target X at all).

This is how I learned it, but I'm not even sure where anymore.  I've been looking for REG quotes to back but so far no luck.  If I'm just crazy, let me know.  :P

Can CBN affect a character immune to the affect?  I would say no.  Am I wrong?
Title: Re: CBN vs Immunity
Post by: Daniel TS RED on November 16, 2010, 10:42:23 AM
a regardless of immunity should be added to ANB because it's difficult to start a new turn if you got an EC that won't leave battle.
Title: Re: CBN vs Immunity
Post by: SomeKittens on November 16, 2010, 11:58:27 PM
I've always ruled that they return to territory, after a successful block (by removal)
Title: Re: CBN vs Immunity
Post by: RedemptionAggie on November 17, 2010, 01:46:13 AM
A CBN card shouldn't be able to effect an immune character.  "Immune to" and "Protected from" are essentially the same (on characters), according to the REG.
Title: Re: CBN vs Immunity
Post by: Korunks on November 17, 2010, 10:17:41 AM
Thats what I thought, but I never trust my initial assumptions with CBN anymore. 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal