No. | Name | (Set) | Site Choice? |
1. | Prof Underwood | (FooF, 2007 and 2011) | C |
2. | Wyatt Marcum | (Priests) | D |
3. | Red | (Disciples) | D |
4. | _JM_ | (RoA, 2008, 2011, 2013) | C |
5. | Drrek | (I/J Decks) | D |
6. | browarod | (G/H Decks) | C |
7. | Isildur | (Original Set and Prophets) | D |
8. | theselfevident | (TexP) | D |
9. | Westy | (E/F) | D |
10. | Redoubter | (Angel Wars) | C |
11. | Gabe | (Warriors) | D (E) |
12. | TechnoEthicist | (Kings) | C |
13. | KoalaKing | (Apostles) | D |
14. | jbeers285 | (C/D Decks) | D |
15. | Red Dragon Thorn | (Patriarchs) | ? |
16. | RTSManiac | (Women) | D |
I'll join and reserve FooF.
This is an interesting idea. My first thought is HOW on earth can this be at all balanced. But then I Remembered that the old sets/starter decks that I wouldn't think would have a chance actually could. All starter decks get the advantage of having great dominants (SoG/AotL/CM/Burial), and Women's get Falling Away.
This could be really fun.
I definitely think this format is broken, but it's also meant to be broken probably in some ways. If I had more time, I'd probably join with RoA, but I can't commit to it.
I actually think that G/H probably has the best chance of winning. As far as sites, I don't know how much of an issue they will be since most decks in this format are going to be many, many colors. I'd say limiting sites might be the way to go though (maybe 2x?)
I choose Disciples.
that would only matter for newer colored sites, like teal. but there are heros with site access everywhere.
but everyone will have rainbow decks. only one or two sets will manage to make a deck that is fairly focused on a single color. and those are priests, and mabey angel wars.You'd be susprised Wyatt. You'd be susprised.
Sure, this sounds fun, I'll take I/JDang it you beat me by like 2 minutes. :(
I'll take the Blue and the Green.
I'm in with texp with a vote for option D
With a question tho, are you not allowed to use doms from other sets like a & b decks?
I'm in with texp with a vote for option D
With a question tho, are you not allowed to use doms from other sets like a & b decks?
I need to double check whether or not RTS/hamachi is working for me (I haven't tested it since downloading the new cards), and while I might be able to do it tonight, it probably won't happen until Friday. May I reserve E/F, or should I want until I know for sure?
And D. I'm fine with sites.
Will do. Though E is tempting, I'll stick with D.I need to double check whether or not RTS/hamachi is working for me (I haven't tested it since downloading the new cards), and while I might be able to do it tonight, it probably won't happen until Friday. May I reserve E/F, or should I want until I know for sure?
And D. I'm fine with sites.
You can reserve it for now, but please let me know ASAP if you can't make it.
In this case, may I change to Un/Limited/A/B Decks/Prophets with choice C
By the way, I would find it hilarious if I won first, since my prize would either be 1 card from the I/J starters, or an I/J starter deck.
Hey,
Do promos go with the set they were printed with or are they not used by anyone?
Does the Warriors Player get to use Goshen and Kingdoms as access sites? :)
Tschow,
Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly
I'll take Warriors. If it's ok that I don't use hamachi that is. I host RTS the old fashioned way and let people connect to me directly.
For Sites my first choice is D, my second is E.
Since this is an elimination tournament instead of a swiss or round robin, should we try to rank the sets to get seeds?
As each new set comes out, several new cards are added to decks, but not all of the old cards are replaced. Some older cards have stood the test of time, despite reprints, hard counters, and the stigma of being "old". Well, now it's time to find out which set is best. Here's how it will work:
Since this is an elimination tournament instead of a swiss or round robin, should we try to rank the sets to get seeds?
Well, those who happened to get the better decks shouldn't get more of an advantage, I would think. Random seeding would be best and most fair...as long as I don't draw Apostles.
I'll take Warriors. If it's ok that I don't use hamachi that is. I host RTS the old fashioned way and let people connect to me directly.
For Sites my first choice is D, my second is E.
That is ok with me, as long as you are able to explain to people who haven't done so how to do that.
I'll take Warriors. If it's ok that I don't use hamachi that is. I host RTS the old fashioned way and let people connect to me directly.
For Sites my first choice is D, my second is E.
That is ok with me, as long as you are able to explain to people who haven't done so how to do that.
It's literally no different for the opponent. I give them my IP address and they connect using the default port. ::)
Are we allowed to use multiple copies of each card from our set?
ill renig and take limited unlimited a/b prophets
fail i didnt realize this was gone i guess ill go c/d decks
Drrek and Isildur, I don't have your votes on the site issue.
I would guess you'd both probably be C or E, but I don't want to presume. Maybe you like a challenge... ::)
How:
There is no need to check in decks, and you can use as many different decks as you want. You can "customize" your deck based on what your opponent is using before your game.
How:
There is no need to check in decks, and you can use as many different decks as you want. You can "customize" your deck based on what your opponent is using before your game.
You know it.
Too OP!
I am cool with D.... So long as there is a rule or a gentlemens agreement between players NOT to use sites in a color the other player does not have access to...
Example would be since Gabe has picked the Warriors set he would not include Silver sites in his deck because I have no cards with the color Silver in the Blues and Greens.
You know it.
Too OP!
Don't forget 3 plots in 4 games
I'm fine with it, as long as I can change if the set I'm against can get in to them.
I'd be happy to fill that gap.
...
TxP
E/F
Women
A/B with prophets
Apostles
C/D
Angel Wars
I can't see how starter decks... and Angel Wars...could possibly be below TexPI don't want to give ideas to my opponent that may come back to bite me, but suffice it to say that there are some sneaky things that I would do if I were using TxP, that I think give it a better chance than the sets below it. For instance, how do you see A/B getting any LSs past Philly Garrison after they use their AotL, and he comes back once off Philly Outpost? For that matter, that one move will shut down multiple decks going against TxP. It's not as bad as you think.
I can't see how starter decks... and Angel Wars...could possibly be below TexPI don't want to give ideas to my opponent that may come back to bite me, but suffice it to say that there are some sneaky things that I would do if I were using TxP, that I think give it a better chance than the sets below it. For instance, how do you see A/B getting any LSs past Philly Garrison after they use their AotL, and he comes back once off Philly Outpost? For that matter, that one move will shut down multiple decks going against TxP. It's not as bad as you think.
I can't see how starter decks... and Angel Wars...could possibly be below TexPI don't want to give ideas to my opponent that may come back to bite me, but suffice it to say that there are some sneaky things that I would do if I were using TxP, that I think give it a better chance than the sets below it. For instance, how do you see A/B getting any LSs past Philly Garrison after they use their AotL, and he comes back once off Philly Outpost? For that matter, that one move will shut down multiple decks going against TxP. It's not as bad as you think.
I count exactly 1 way for TxP do get past one of the 10/10 demons of Original/Prophets/A/B (and even that doesn't get rid of it forever), how do you propose that TxP gets the 5 souls?10/10 demons pssh real men use The False Prophet 8)
Stalks of FlaxShhhhh. That was one of the sneaky things :)
Stalks of FlaxShhhhh. That was one of the sneaky things :)
Also capture trade with JudahBummer, someone found another of the sneaky things I was talking about. And wouldn't you know it, I got paired up with TSE first round, so now all these great ideas are indeed going to come back to bite me :)
hey Mr.U, looks like I get to play you!Yep, I'll look forward to it.
If there isn't a back up I'll take over Kings.