Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Official Rules & Errata => REG and ORDIR => Topic started by: RedemptionAggie on May 11, 2017, 02:25:21 AM

Title: REG 4.1.0 Corrections & Questions
Post by: RedemptionAggie on May 11, 2017, 02:25:21 AM
Deck Building Rules
T2 - Maximum 1 probably needs Covenants (and potentially Curses, for future cards) added to account for Seventh Seal. 

T2 - Maximum 2 - Is Babylon/The Harlot supposed to be caught by this, or should it be limited to Curses, Covenants, Enhancements, Heroes and Evil Characters?

Two typos in the first bullet under other rules:
Quote
Dual-alignment cards count as evil/neutral/good based on their face-value alignment (I.E. Saul/Paul (Ap) is an evil card at face value and counts as evil for deck building purposes). If a dual-alignment card is different alignments at face-value it counts as all of those alignments for deck building purposes. If neutral is one of the alignments the card counts as good and/or evil based on the other alignment(s).

Capture
How to Play:
1st Paragraph, Last Sentence
Quote
While held captive in a Land of Bondage, captured human characters are also Lost Souls.

4th Paragraph
Quote
A captured human is treated as a Lost Soul.

This addition of the 4th paragraph seems redundant.

Look
The last updated line just has a date, whereas other entries have Last Updated: Date.  There's other formatting issues spread around, but Gabe mentioned something about changing the REG structure on the LoR thread which may take care of them anyway.

Rescue
Default Conditions, 2nd Bullet, Typos:
Quote
Rescue a abilities only target Lost Souls and humans

Default Conditions:
Quote
Targets must be in an opponent’s Land of Bondage.
Special Conditions:
Quote
A rescue ability with a non-Lost Soul target can rescue that target from a location other than the Land of Bondage.

Couldn't the special condition be removed by changing the default condition to be Lost Soul Targets instead of just Targets?  Those statements just seem weird that close together.

Resurrect
Does this entry need a Clarification for older resurrect language?  i.e. Raising of Lazarus (http://redemption.wikia.com/wiki/Raising_Lazarus_(I))
Title: Re: REG 4.1.0 Corrections & Questions
Post by: Gabe on May 11, 2017, 09:01:32 AM
Thanks for all your feedback! I'm conferring with my associates on a couple of these items before making the changes, but these fixes will be made and uploaded soon.

We also caught that the deck building section is not linked and the top. We want Reserve to stand out there since it's new and people will be looking for it.
Title: Re: REG 4.1.0 Corrections & Questions
Post by: asrgimli on May 31, 2017, 10:19:13 AM
Should Reserve be added to the list of Out of Play?
Title: Re: REG 4.1.0 Corrections & Questions
Post by: Gabe on May 31, 2017, 10:45:47 AM
Should Reserve be added to the list of Out of Play?

Yes, sir. I think that makes sense.
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal