-
This is for the Feb/March ROOT tournament. If you're interested in joining, please post in this thread and you'll be added to the list. We will be going until the end of March.
"No 1st turn RA's or Doms" is out:
This month we will not be experimenting with the proposed 'No 1st turn RAs or Dominants' rule. However, please share your experiences with the rule here (http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/redemption-online-official-tournament/feedback-on-1st-turn-limits-%28used-in-jan-root%29/).
No rule experiments this month!
We're taking a month off of the rule changes to let any newcomers that might be joining due to LordZardeck's excellent Redemption Connect lobby get adjusted, as well as give the ROOT veterans a bit of a break. Rule experiments will continue after this tournament.
Matchups for week 7/7 (last):
adotson85 v. Alex Olijar
Minister Polarius v. Chronic Apathy
Prof Underwood v. Professoralstad
Lord Zardeck v. theselfevident
RTSmaniac v. Hobbit13
_JM_ v. megamanlan
Irish Luck v. katedid
slugfencer v. Praeceps
Final Rankings:
1. (22/12) Alex Olijar *1 HP used
2. (22/10) Chronic Apathy *1 HP used
3. (22/9) Minister Polarius *2 HP used
4. (22/9) Professoralstad
5. (22/6) adotson85
6. (19.5/9) Lord Zardeck
7. (19/8) Prof Underwood
8. (16/4) theselfevident *2 HP used
9. (14/1) RTSmaniac
10. (14/-4) Hobbit13
11. (14/-6) _JM_
12. (13/-5) Irish Luck
13. (12/-3) megamanlan
14. (12/-7) katedid
15. (12/-13) Praeceps *1 HP used
16. (11.5/-15) slugfencer
--. (9/-4) SomeKittens dropped out of tourney
--. (6/-12) Red dropped out of tourney
--. (2/-11) NWJonathan dropped out of tourney
-
I'll give it a shot this time around
-
Time for me to get back in on this. Sign me up!
-
This Jedi master is up for another go. :kenobi:
-
Praise the Lord it's not rule exeperiments. I'm in.
-
Im up for it
-
+1
-
Get. Shame there's no rules augmentations, but I'll make do.
-
I'm in
-
Get. Shame there's no rules augmentations, but I'll make do.
Don't worry, we'll be trying something for the next one, and you'll even get to pick between 3 choices for it :)
As for this ROOT, I'm in :)
-
Victory is mine! Sign me up.
-
I'll do it.
-
*sigh* Guess I'll do it so Chris won't beat me to a pulp...
-
Sure
-
In.
-
Jawohl
-
Week 0 Rankings
& Week 1 Matchups
are posted.
-
I would like to be added. I can play JM this week.
-
I'm in!
-
Week 0 Rankings
13. SomeKittens
Oh good, I've already reached my goal.
-
I would like to be added. I can play JM this week.
I'm in!
Both of you are added. In the future, please sign-up ahead of time to make things more fair for everyone else who is randomly assigned opponents the 1st round (thanks random.org). I don't mind new players joining late, but both of you are returning players. We'll let it go this month, but everyone should consider this the general warning to all.
-
Can you re randomize? You completely skipped me, and I did sign up.
-
OK, I'll be re-randomizing. Please don't play games yet.
-
I beat katedid over 9000 to zero.
-
Jawohl
Why am I not on the list? Jawohl=German for 'yes indeed' :)
-
You completely skipped me, and I did sign up.
Why am I not on the list?
I apologize. We had a simple glitch here where CA started this thread and updated the list as people signed up. Then I modified the OP so that it would show the rankings and games. I assumed that the list was up to date without reading through all the replies (my mistake). Therefore the last few people who signed up were not included (Adotson, Alex, and Slug).
I will now re-randomize the new list and post the new games. Sorry again for the confusion.
-
So we can start playing games now?
-
So we can start playing games now?
Yes, the rankings have been updated.
-
I won the standard coin flip 5-4, Red used a Plot.
-
I won the standard coin flip 5-4, Red used a Plot.
+1
-
You completely skipped me, and I did sign up.
Why am I not on the list?
I apologize. We had a simple glitch here where CA started this thread and updated the list as people signed up. Then I modified the OP so that it would show the rankings and games. I assumed that the list was up to date without reading through all the replies (my mistake). Therefore the last few people who signed up were not included (Adotson, Alex, and Slug).
I will now re-randomize the new list and post the new games. Sorry again for the confusion.
No prob-thanks for running the tourney! :)
-
I won against Irish luck 5-1, in a game that was much closer than the score appears. I used a plot.
-
Red used a Plot.
I used a plot.
Wow, Haman's Plots are dropping like flies. 2 games into a 7 round tournament, and we already have 2 ripped.
-
That's kinda a waste unless you think your opponent is a boss :)
-
Count me in
-
I had Gallows out when TheSelfEvident used Plot so he still has three
-
I had Gallows out when TheSelfEvident used Plot so he still has three
In that case, it's actually better to just not report the use of the plot. Otherwise, I might get confused :)
-
After discussing things with Prof Underwood, we've agreed to implement a new rule from here on out. After the pairings and rankings of a week are announced, anyone who requests to join afterwards will have to wait until the next week to join. A possible exception will be made if someone drops out and a person offers to take their place.
-
I had Gallows out when TheSelfEvident used Plot so he still has three
In that case, it's actually better to just not report the use of the plot. Otherwise, I might get confused :)
Actually that is my confusion as I didn't realize Gallows was global and so I must thank Irish_Luck for that info =)
-
After discussing things with Prof Underwood, we've agreed to implement a new rule from here on out. After the pairings and rankings of a week are announced, anyone who requests to join afterwards will have to wait until the next week to join. A possible exception will be made if someone drops out and a person offers to take their place.
Or unless there is a bye I hope?
-
Or unless there is a bye I hope?
We'll probably make exceptions for this too. We just want to make sure that people don't set up their first round game by joining late. It also makes it easier on us to manage if everyone signs up on time :)
-
That's kinda a waste unless you think your opponent is a boss :)
Apparently I did because I plotted Mega to win 5-1.
-
I won 5-2.
-
loss to chronic 2-5
-
Wow, didn't realize it had started. I'd like to join.
-
I defeated Praeceps 5-0.
-
I defeated Praeceps 5-0.
Confirm
-
Wow, didn't realize it had started. I'd like to join.
Glad to have you back again, I'll assign you a game starting next week :)
-
Wow, didn't realize it had started. I'd like to join.
Glad to have you back again, I'll assign you a game starting next week :)
Is there any way to auto-sign-up? Cause I'm never going to remember to sign up the first week, let alone even remember when the first week's sign-up is.
-
The first week sign up is usually during the last week of the previous month.
-
Is there any way to auto-sign-up? Cause I'm never going to remember to sign up the first week, let alone even remember when the first week's sign-up is.
Unfortunately, if we did auto-sign-ups, then we would start the month with several people who do NOT plan on playing the next month, and then all of their 1st round opponents would get ghosted on. We already have enough of an issue with people ghosting occasionally that I don't want to increase that negative experience.
However, SK is right that the new sign-up always shows up around the last week of the current tournament (in this case, that will be the last week of March).
-
I one versus _JM_ 5-1.
-
I one versus _JM_ 5-1.
Confirmed.
-
I would like in!!!! Thanks!
-
I would like in!!!! Thanks!
You are in :)
-
Won my match against NWJonathan 5-2.
-
I won 5-0 in spite of technology gremlins.
-
I won 5-0 in spite of technology gremlins.
I confirmeth--actually he shoulda got credit for beating me like 9 times considering how many times we had to reconnect/restart/re-whatever. :)
-
I won 5-0 in spite of technology gremlins.
I confirmeth--actually he shoulda got credit for beating me like 9 times considering how many times we had to reconnect/restart/re-whatever. :)
This wouldn't be in relation with the issues some of the players are having with the RTS Lobby would it?
-
I won 5-0 in spite of technology gremlins.
I confirmeth--actually he shoulda got credit for beating me like 9 times considering how many times we had to reconnect/restart/re-whatever. :)
This wouldn't be in relation with the issues some of the players are having with the RTS Lobby would it?
I have no idea what was going on--we were using red connect. I am very puter unskilled. I do appreciate your hard work in making redemption connect available for us to play on. :)
-
Just for disclosure, I did get ghosted on this week.
-
Week 1 Rankings
& Week 2 Matchups
are posted.
-
In a game where offense cried,
LordZardeck=0
me=0
GG :)
-
confirm. though if the time limit had been literally 5 min longer, i would have won 3-0. :p curse tourny time limits ;-)
-
I lost 4-5.
-
I lost 4-5.
Confirm
-
I won against Hobbit 5-0 in a very good game that was a lot more fun than it seems on paper...
In this game I did rip a plot
-
Confirm, gg.
-
I won 5-0 vs. Pracepts... w/o SoG/NJ... thats rare.
-
I won 5-0 vs. Pracepts... w/o SoG/NJ... thats rare.
Confirm. I also ripped a plot.
-
I won 5-0 vs. Pracepts... w/o SoG/NJ... thats rare.
Very nice. Kudos
-
I won 5-0 vs. Pracepts... w/o SoG/NJ... thats rare.
Oddly enough I won my game against Hobbit 5-0 w/o sog/nj/aotl...
-
I won 5-0 vs. Pracepts... w/o SoG/NJ... thats rare.
Oddly enough I won my game against Hobbit 5-0 w/o sog/nj/aotl...
Yeah, SoG and NJ are outdated. ;-)
-
Underwood 5 Good Guys 3
-
Underwood 5 Good Guys 3
That's weird, I thought it was Alex 3, Good guys 5 :)
Either way, it was a well-played game despite connection difficulties and unequal card drawing.
-
I haven't seen my opponet at all this week. I do not want to get ghosted as I have sent a pm.
-
When did you send a PM?
-
I think I sent one early this week. And to be truthful I wish you wouldn't pair me with with NWJ again.
-
It's done randomly, not based on what the participants want. I have gotten paired with people I would prefer not to play with as well, but it's not my call, nor is it Underwood's. If you and NWJ don't get a game in, and he doesn't confirm the ghosting, I'm going to need you to screencap your PM.
-
This will be the second month in a row I was paired with an opponet that makes no effort to contact me. Last month him not making any effort to play with me cost me a placing. I don't want it to happen again. I've been active. I shouldn't have to screencap a pm.
-
Underwood and I will discuss this before the start of next month. In the meantime, my statement sticks - it's done randomly, not based on what participants want.
-
This will be the second month in a row I was paired with an opponet that makes no effort to contact me. Last month him not making any effort to play with me cost me a placing. I don't want it to happen again. I've been active. I shouldn't have to screencap a pm.
You could just auto-save your PMs like everyone else does instead of screen capping??
-
Quite simply, I don't like trusting someone's word when it comes to ghosting. Anyone can just make up text and send it to me in the correct format, and I'm of the opinion that if someone can't take the 2-3 minutes necessary to save and upload a screencap, they don't need the points. I distinctly recall Red mentioning in the previous topic not to trust a person's word when they say they've been ghosted, and that's exactly what I'm doing. Now that said, I realize that things happen and sometimes people (especially younger members) can't screencap for whatever reason. If NWJonathan comes on and confirms the ghosting (or otherwise doesn't post here or PM Underwood or myself to defend himself), then Red doesn't need to screencap. If he denies the charges, however, then I need to see some screencaps. I meant to elaborate on that in my previous post, and for that, Red, I apologize. In regards to last month, I didn't receive a PM from you and you didn't post in the topic, so unless you PM'd Underwood about it (in which case, I trust his judgement completely), you can't blame your opponent for not attempting to make contact with you.
-
i dont even know how to screen cap or what it is...
-
Screencapping (or Print Screening) allows you to save a snapshot of whatever your screen looks like at that moment to the clipboard. You can paste it in Paint or Photoshop or something and save it as a picture file.
-
Red defeated me 5-2.
-
+1
-
This will be the second month in a row I was paired with an opponet that makes no effort to contact me. Last month him not making any effort to play with me cost me a placing. I don't want it to happen again. I've been active. I shouldn't have to screencap a pm.
You could just auto-save your PMs like everyone else does instead of screen capping??
You can auto-save your sent pms??? how???
-
I won 5-3, using a much-needed Plot.
-
I won 5-3, using a much-needed Plot.
Confirm.
-
I won 5-0
-
I won 5-0
confirm.
-
Week 2 Rankings
& Week 3 Matchups
are posted.
-
This will be the second month in a row I was paired with an opponet that makes no effort to contact me. Last month him not making any effort to play with me cost me a placing. I don't want it to happen again. I've been active. I shouldn't have to screencap a pm.
You could just auto-save your PMs like everyone else does instead of screen capping??
You can auto-save your sent pms??? how???
Profile -> Account Settings then on that screen modify profile -> Personal messaging
second to last check box
-
This will be the second month in a row I was paired with an opponet that makes no effort to contact me. Last month him not making any effort to play with me cost me a placing. I don't want it to happen again. I've been active. I shouldn't have to screencap a pm.
You could just auto-save your PMs like everyone else does instead of screen capping??
You can auto-save your sent pms??? how???
Profile -> Account Settings then on that screen modify profile -> Personal messaging
second to last check box
oh noes! Thank you SOO much. I've been wanting to do that for 4 years! :p
-
I won 5-1.
-
I defeated Praeceps 5-3.
-
I defeated Praeceps 5-3.
Confirm
-
I won 5-1.
yeah over an opponet that's sick and not at full capcity.
-
I took out one corner of Fortress Alstad 5-0
-
I took out one corner of Fortress Alstad 5-0
Confirm.
-
I won 5-4 in a really tough game
-
confirmed
-
Hey, quick heads up for whoever gets me next round. There's a good chance I will be without internet access until Friday. I'll have all kinds of time to play next weekend, just probably won't be in contact until then.
-
I won 5-1, TSE used a plot.
-
I won 5-1, TSE used a plot.
Confirm, this game was much closer than this looked, much much closer, I hate you MAYHEM...
-
katedid=2
me=3
GG :)
-
Andrew=2
FTM=5
;)
-
Confirmed.
I've also received PMs to the affect of giving ghost points to Zardeck and Kittens. If NWJ or Hobbit want to dispute this, please contact me.
-
I ghosted Some Kittens.
-
NWJ did contact me saying he dropped out.
-
Week 3 Rankings
& Week 4 Matchups
are posted.
-
Alex won 5-2. Chronic renounces Redemption forever.
-
Alex won 5-2. Chronic renounces Redemption forever.
Confirm.
-
ProfAlstad=7
me=4
GG weathering time and RTS bugs! :)
-
ProfAlstad=7
me=4
GG weathering time and RTS bugs! :)
Confirm. GG
-
ProfAlstad=7
me=4
GG weathering time and RTS bugs! :)
Could you pm me the details of the issues you were having?
-
ProfAlstad=7
me=4
GG weathering time and RTS bugs! :)
Could you pm me the details of the issues you were having?
Done.
-
Just won 5-1 in a fun game. Oh, and I wasted my first plot ever.
-
I won 5-4.
-
I won 5-4.
Yep, in an epic game of the final unbeatens for this month, Pol avenged his loss from last month and eeked out a close victory. He deserved the win as I made too many mistakes and he played too well to lose :)
-
I sent JM a pm on my availability yet did not save it in my inbox... :'(
-
Pulled off a 5-4 win against TSE.
-
Pulled off a 5-4 win against TSE.
It was close for sure, great game here
-
I won versus Praeceps 5-0, gg.
we both used plot.
-
Just won 5-1 in a fun game. Oh, and I wasted my first plot ever.
Confirm, I totally messed up by forgetting to put 2-liner In a Site.
-
jm win 5-2
-
jm win 5-2
confirmage.
-
I won 5-2. Kittens used a plot
-
I won 5-2. Kittens used a plot
Confirm
-
Week 4 Rankings
& Week 5 Matchups
are posted.
-
6th place?? Wow. I never imagined i'd get so close to the top 5. Now only if luck will stay with me...
-
I'm gonna have to drop out. Life is pretty busy. Maybe by the time the summer gets here.
-
Oulasted LordZ for a 5-3 victory.
-
adotson stole my 5th place victory with a VERY long and tough game. In a last ditch effort I ANB'd him, but left me with no defense for his final ra. gg at 5-3
-
I won 5-1.
-
I won 5-1.
confirm, chronic ripped a plot
-
Hobbit=7
me=5
GG :)
-
Confirm GG :)
-
im interested in joining. how do i get the new 2011 set on my rts?
-
im interested in joining. how do i get the new 2011 set on my rts?
If you have RTS already installed, you can use my updater http://play.redemptionconnect.com/rts/Update.exe (http://play.redemptionconnect.com/rts/Update.exe).
If you DON'T have RTS installed, you can use my all-in-one installer http://play.redemptionconnect.com/rts/setup.exe (http://play.redemptionconnect.com/rts/setup.exe)
-
wish i just downloaded this from u in the first place, i got it from the captain of the host site, trying to make sure it is all working because one of them created a rts folder in program files and another created redemption table simulator
i delete the old files and downloaded from you. Got all the cards now thanks.
-
I lost 3-5 to Pol
-
Confirm.
-
Are we going to finish the February/March ROOT without the new rule changes, or are they being implemented here?
-
Good question. I'd prefer they be implemented now, but I'll defer to Underwood.
-
Good question. I'd prefer they be implemented now, but I'll defer to Underwood.
Just my two cents obviously, but I don't think it's a good idea to change rules mid-tourney. A week is not nearly enough time to adjust, they will probably have their decks adjusted but the first time two players forget about no more FTM there will be issues. Do what you want, I just don't think it would be wise.
-
Good question. I'd prefer they be implemented now, but I'll defer to Underwood.
Just my two cents obviously, but I don't think it's a good idea to change rules mid-tourney. A week is not nearly enough time to adjust, they will probably have their decks adjusted but the first time two players forget about no more FTM there will be issues. Do what you want, I just don't think it would be wise.
Yeah, that's the direction I think we'll end up leaning towards, but the big advantage of ROOT is that, even now, there's a week and a half before the end of next week, so people have plenty of time to build new decks to compensate. If they happen to forget the other rules, that's bound to happen even if we don't start until the April ROOT, and I've forgotten to test rules in various weeks, probably more than even the average participant. I don't feel that strongly either way about it.
-
I can see both sides on this one. I feel strongly that we will finish THIS week using the old rules. Then that only leaves 1 more week for this month (which means 1 game). I don't think that it is likely to be worth it to make everyone switch their decks just for 1 game.
Also, we can use the sign up for the April ROOT as a good reminder to everyone of the new rule changes. Hopefully by then we will also have a definite answer regarding whether Evil AND Good doms will be restricted from being played in the 1st round of a game (and possibly the ruling about duplicate characters that everyone is waiting on).
-
If I'm not mistaken, we have two weeks left for this month not including the rest of this week. We said seven weeks, and we're on week five. Did you decide to change that? Regardless, do see a problem in letting people play by the new rules if they choose to, but if there's a disagree, default to the old rules for the rest of this month?
-
Well, this is my last ROOT tourney because of the new rules. I would really hope you'd wait until the end of the current tourney to implement the new rules, but I'll finish one way or the other. I do need time to adjust my deck if you decide to implement them now.
-
If I'm not mistaken, we have two weeks left for this month not including the rest of this week. We said seven weeks, and we're on week five. Did you decide to change that? Regardless, do see a problem in letting people play by the new rules if they choose to, but if there's a disagree, default to the old rules for the rest of this month?
You are not mistaken, there are indeed 2 weeks left. This longer than normal tourney had me confused for a bit :)
I would be ok with letting people play by the new rules if both players agree to it. However, I think the default should be to finish this tournament with the old rules.
-
If I'm not mistaken, we have two weeks left for this month not including the rest of this week. We said seven weeks, and we're on week five. Did you decide to change that? Regardless, do see a problem in letting people play by the new rules if they choose to, but if there's a disagree, default to the old rules for the rest of this month?
You are not mistake, there are indeed 2 weeks left. This longer than normal tourney had me confused for a bit :)
I would be ok with letting people play by the new rules if both players agree to it. However, I think the default should be to finish this tournament with the old rules.
I agree with this.
All members of ROOT can consider this official: Play by the new rules if you want, however, the default is the old rules, if there's any dispute.
-
Regardless, Mayhem has been errata'd officially, so there will be no FTM's regardless of whether the players use the new rules.
-
Regardless, Mayhem has been errata'd officially, so there will be no FTM's regardless of whether the players use the new rules.
The Mayhem errata is, for all intents and purposes, considered "part of the new rules." If people choose to play without it (though this should be extremely well-established by both players before the draw), I'm going to allow that.
-
I don't think that's right. Mayhem has been errata'd, that's different than a new batch of rules. All it does is stop FTM, why would you be opposed to that?
-
Mayhem's errata was originally a rule change, until the rule change was voted down by the community. I don't imagine that many people will choose to play without the errata, but for the next two weeks of ROOT, as per Underwood and I's decision in this thread, I'm going to allow people to play without it if they so choose. If Underwood or Rob himself posts in this thread and says the errata sticks for all games, then I'll consider myself overruled, but that's the decision I'm going with.
-
Can you play with the errata and w/o dom cap?
-
Can you play with the errata and w/o dom cap?
Yeah, that's fine. Feel free to pick and choose which rules you want to play with, just keep in mind that starting in April, all rule changes go into effect for all the games.
-
I understand where Pol is coming from about the Mayhem errata. However, I'll support Chronic's call on for the remainder of this tournament. Since we're in the middle of a tournament, I don't feel right in forcing people to change decks in the middle of things.
At the same time, I think just about everybody hates FTM, therefore I suspect that most games both players will agree to go with the new errata :)
-
What is FTM?
-
What is FTM?
First Turn Mayhem.
-
Oh. I don't see what the big problem was. What makes the first turn so bad to use mayhem on than any other?
-
Oh. I don't see what the big problem was. What makes the first turn so bad to use mayhem on than any other?
I'll pitch a scenario to you. The game starts and you drew one soul, while your opponent drew two, and he opts to go first. He then proceeds to put down all but three cards from his hand into play (a few heroes, an EC or two, maybe a couple artifacts), and then ends his turn, putting down Mayhem as soon as you draw. He now has an eight card lead on you, and in the first turn of the game, an eight card lead is the difference between winning or losing a good chunk of the time.
-
FTM can be as much as an 11 card advantage. Besides which, instead of starting the game out with 11 cards to work with, you have only 6, meaning you not only have an card disadvantage, but a setup disadvantage as well. I have won a few games where I got FTM'd, but they're the exception. The winner of last year's nationals got 6 FTMs and none against him.
-
Ok, yeah I can see how that can be a problem
-
I defeated Katedid 5-3.
-
I defeated Katedid 5-3.
Confirm. I was an intersting game to say the least
EDIT: Interesting enough to note that had we decided to play by the new rules, this game would have ended as a 3-3 tie with no more available lost souls.
-
I'm dropping out. I'm giving the game to _JM_, 5-0
-
I'm dropping out. I'm giving the game to _JM_, 5-0
confirmed.
-
I defeated Katedid 5-3.
Confirm. I was an intersting game to say the least
EDIT: Interesting enough to note that had we decided to play by the new rules, this game would have ended as a 3-3 tie with no more available lost souls.
How did you get 14 LSs between you down to 6 exactly? burial gets rid of 2.
-
i won an extremely technical game against mega 5-2
-
i won an extremely technical game against mega 5-2
confirm... only because we reset the game when I had the best hand ever.
-
EDIT: Interesting enough to note that had we decided to play by the new rules, this game would have ended as a 3-3 tie with no more available lost souls.
I can see how you could think that, but if you hadn't used your SoG/NJ on your LS's, there would have been two more LS's available for me to rescue with my SoG/NJ.
-
Just for the record, I was ghosted on by Irish Luck.
-
Just for the record, I was ghosted on by Irish Luck.
Confirm
-
When are the new matchups and rankings going to be posted?
-
Week 5 Rankings
& Week 6 Matchups
are posted.
-
I did not use a 3rd HP, I said Chronic Apathy used an HP
-
I did not use a 3rd HP, I said Chronic Apathy used an HP
I edited the post to reflect this. =)
-
I did not use a 3rd HP, I said Chronic Apathy used an HP
Sorry about that. Thanks for fixing it Chronic :)
-
I won 5-4 in an appropriately tight game.
-
I just got beat 5-4 in a really good game with Chronic. Congrats to my fellow ROOT leader :)
-
when does the new tourney month start? I got on redemption connect now and interested in playing the next month.
-
when does the new tourney month start? I got on redemption connect now and interested in playing the next month.
April 1st or 2nd. We'll be glad to have you join us :)
-
I showed TheHobbit why #7 is better than #8. I won 5-0.
;)
-
I won 5-1 vs. Slugfencer.
-
I won 5-1 vs. Slugfencer.
I confirmeth after like 4 retries with computer problems :o
GG :)
-
when does the new tourney month start? I got on redemption connect now and interested in playing the next month.
April 1st or 2nd. We'll be glad to have you join us :)
sounds good, looking forward to playing you again. z
-
I showed TheHobbit why #7 is better than #8. I won 5-0.
;)
Confirm. ;)
-
I won against Katedid 5-0
-
I won against Katedid 5-0
confirm
-
I lost 2-5.
-
I lost 2-5.
Confirm. Pol used a plot.
-
Win over Praeceps 5-4
-
Win over Praeceps 5-4
Confirm
-
JM message me and said he ghosted.
-
Irish Lucky messaged me and said he was going to give me Ghosting points.
-
JM message me and said he ghosted.
confirmed.
-
Irish Lucky messaged me and said he was going to give me Ghosting points.
confirm
-
Week 6 Rankings
& Final Week Matchups
are posted.
-
I thought I already played Chronic this month ??? Maybe I'm just confused.
-
I thought I already played Chronic this month ??? Maybe I'm just confused.
Perhaps you're confusing this ROOT with the Jan/Feb ROOT? I don't have any record of you guys playing each other, so I really hope you didn't (otherwise I've got bigger problems) :)
-
Praeceps=2
me=0
GG :)
-
Praeceps=2
me=0
GG :)
Indeed
-
I thought I already played Chronic this month ??? Maybe I'm just confused.
We played towards the end of last month, not this month. I sent you a PM.
-
I just won an EXTREMELY close game against tse, 5-4. I was on the edge of my chair with that game.
-
I just won an EXTREMELY close game against tse, 5-4. I was on the edge of my chair with that game.
Confirm, I honestly don't think it could have been any closer than it was. Zardeck used a plot.
-
Amidst connection issues, I won 5-3.
-
Confirm.
-
I won 5-4
-
I won 5-4
Confirm
-
Prof A: 5
Prof U: 4
Another epic matchup between the Profs.
-
Prof A: 5
Prof U: 4
Another epic matchup between the Profs.
Confirm. It was a great final game to finish a really great ROOT. Well played sir :)
-
Final Rankings
are posted.
Congratulations to our winners (Alex Olijar, Chronic, and Polarius). It was super close at the top with 5 people sharing the lead for victory points and a circle of victory at the top (#1 beat #2, #2 beat #3, and #3 beat #1) so we had to go by differential.
An honorable mention goes to Adotson, who had the hardest schedule of the ROOT. He ended up going 4-2 against the top 8 players and added in a win against NWJ on top of that. It was a month to be proud of.
-
I like that my plots are less urgent than TSE's.
-
I'm not sure what happened... My opponent stopped responding during our round today and I couldnt make contact w/ him afterwards... I'm not sure how to put that. We both had 2 LS's.
-
I'm not sure what happened... My opponent stopped responding during our round today and I couldnt make contact w/ him afterwards... I'm not sure how to put that. We both had 2 LS's.
confirm. My internet connection dropped on me, and it didn't get back on until this morning.
-
I'm not sure what happened... My opponent stopped responding during our round today and I couldnt make contact w/ him afterwards... I'm not sure how to put that. We both had 2 LS's.
confirm. My internet connection dropped on me, and it didn't get back on until this morning.
Since it won't change anything in the top 3, and since this wasn't reported until after midnight PST, I think we'll just leave this be rather than re-figuring stuff. But hopefully you'll be able to get your connection working for your next game :)
-
I'm fairly confident it's a one time issue. I'm guessing either comcast decided to perform maintenance on their network (not an unknown occurrence here, but usually we get a notification of that) or there was some kind of accident that shut things down.