Author Topic: You Pick The Card For The Next Design/Development Article (Read 4953 times)

Gabe · « **on:** January 27, 2012, 01:47:37 AM »

The first installation of "Design and Development" was about Joseph. If you missed it you can find it here.

I'm taking votes on which suggestion to use for the next Article. There's a good chance I'll end up writing several of these but popular vote will probably be a big determining factor in the order that I publish them. Your opinion matters! Let's see what you guys want.

The options are below. Voting will last one week.

Grapes
TXP Magicians
Territory Class

Thaddeus
Judas Themed Cards

Covenant With Death
Angel Under the Oak/Angel With the Secret Name
Gates of Samaria
Bravery of David
Tower of Thebez

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #1 on:** January 28, 2012, 07:03:32 PM »

It's cool to see the votes spread out quite a bit. 22 votes and no idea has more than six votes? Neat. =)

SomeKittens · « **Reply #2 on:** January 28, 2012, 07:05:38 PM »

I'm liking how no one cares for Cov w/ Death.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #3 on:** January 28, 2012, 07:06:35 PM »

Bryon posted the history of Thad a while back. I'm still rooting for Gates of Samaria

.

browarod · « **Reply #4 on:** January 28, 2012, 08:18:45 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on January 28, 2012, 07:06:35 PM

Bryon posted the history of Thad a while back. I'm still rooting for Gates of Samaria .

Me, too.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #5 on:** January 28, 2012, 08:32:54 PM »

Sauce said Gates of Samaria. I must vote for Gates of Samaria.

Gabe · « **Reply #6 on:** January 28, 2012, 10:28:14 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on January 28, 2012, 07:05:38 PM

I'm liking how no one cares for Cov w/ Death.

There were a couple drastic changes to that card too. I thought it would be a pretty interesting story.

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on January 28, 2012, 07:06:35 PM

I'm still rooting for Gates of Samaria .

I have all the notes for the testing of the entire set and I've still never heard of the version of that card you claim to have seen.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #7 on:** January 28, 2012, 11:07:59 PM »

Aww. I have the file dated at 2/11/11, but I think there was an earlier version I saw. I was really confused at it because I don't think it works as worded.

46. Gates of Samaria
Evil Fortress
Protect Evil Kings of Israel in your territory from opponent's cards. Your brown Kings of Israel cannot be ignored. Opponent must discard 1 card (from hand) for each hero in battle.

Gabe · « **Reply #8 on:** January 28, 2012, 11:28:44 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on January 28, 2012, 11:07:59 PM

Aww. I have the file dated at 2/11/11, but I think there was an earlier version I saw. I was really confused at it because I don't think it works as worded.

46. Gates of Samaria
Evil Fortress
Protect Evil Kings of Israel in your territory from opponent's cards. Your brown Kings of Israel cannot be ignored. Opponent must discard 1 card (from hand) for each hero in battle.

Oh, I see what you mean now. The reason that wasn't familiar to me is that last line, about discarding, was never actually on any version of the card or something we tested. It was simply a suggestion someone made along the way.

Gabe · « **Reply #9 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:35:27 AM »

The angels are running away with the votes! Does anyone have a chance to catch them?

lp670sv · « **Reply #10 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:37:35 AM »

We haven't talked about how broken Thad is recently. Let's do that.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #11 on:** January 30, 2012, 09:59:52 AM »

Quote from: Gabe on January 30, 2012, 08:35:27 AM

The angels are running away with the votes! Does anyone have a chance to catch them?

Are they really that special? I didn't think that they required much thought.

Quote from: lp670sv on January 30, 2012, 08:37:35 AM

We haven't talked about how broken Thad is recently. Let's do that.

We already know what happened to Thad. They thought he would be underused, made him "a little" better too late to properly playtest him. The rest is history.

lp670sv · « **Reply #12 on:** January 30, 2012, 10:04:28 AM »

I know, I just like talking about Thad.

Gabe · « **Reply #13 on:** January 30, 2012, 10:19:05 AM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on January 30, 2012, 09:59:52 AM

Quote from: Gabe on January 30, 2012, 08:35:27 AM
The angels are running away with the votes! Does anyone have a chance to catch them?
Are they really that special? I didn't think that they required much thought.

You can decide after you read the write up about them.

Arrthoa · « **Reply #14 on:** January 30, 2012, 10:40:49 AM »

Almost every card needs to have alot of thought put into it, especially when you see them in almost every samuel or judges deck.

SomeKittens · « **Reply #15 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:19:17 PM »

Quote from: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 12:01:42 PM

I'm still waiting for the article on ANB.

/awaits STAMP's .

Appropriately -1'd, so the balance of the ANB force is maintained.

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #16 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:25:08 PM »

Quote from: SomeKittens on January 30, 2012, 12:19:17 PM

Quote from: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 12:01:42 PM
I'm still waiting for the article on ANB.

/awaits STAMP's .
Appropriately -1'd, so the balance of the ANB force is maintained.

Ow, my feelings.

They burn.

lp670sv · « **Reply #17 on:** January 30, 2012, 12:54:08 PM »

plus 1'd to spite balance, New World Order!

300th post.

Nameless · « **Reply #18 on:** January 30, 2012, 05:48:03 PM »

I feel like we will know about the angels.

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #19 on:** January 30, 2012, 06:00:03 PM »

Quote from: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 12:01:42 PM

I'm still waiting for the article on ANB.

/awaits STAMP's .

+3'd and -3'd. STAMP's vote is still the deciding factor.

lp670sv · « **Reply #20 on:** January 30, 2012, 06:01:41 PM »

I'm afraid I will have to shift my vote to minus to go along with my policy of new world order. now it is -2

SomeKittens · « **Reply #21 on:** January 30, 2012, 07:47:49 PM »

Quote from: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 06:00:03 PM

Quote from: Chronic Apathy on January 30, 2012, 12:01:42 PM
I'm still waiting for the article on ANB.

/awaits STAMP's .

+3'd and -3'd. STAMP's vote is still the deciding factor.

Ouch, two swung votes. Incidentally, I was doing it first

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #22 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:09:32 PM »

I'm still waiting for the article on ANB.

/awaits STAMP's +1.

lp670sv · « **Reply #23 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:12:22 PM »

If we minus -1's as part of a joke, why would we not -1 for you reposting it?

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #24 on:** January 30, 2012, 08:14:34 PM »

Shush. I'll keep deleting it until STAMP is the only like, then I'll screencap it, and make it my avatar.

Gabe · « **Reply #25 on:** February 02, 2012, 12:00:02 AM »

I wonder how it would impact voting if I were to consider starting with the card that got the least votes and working my way up to the one that got the most to increase the anticipation.

lp670sv · « **Reply #26 on:** February 02, 2012, 12:02:10 AM »

Quote from: Gabe on February 02, 2012, 12:00:02 AM

I wonder how it would impact voting if I were to consider starting with the card that got the least votes and working my way up to the one that got the most to increase the anticipation.

It would inverse. pretty simple.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #27 on:** February 02, 2012, 12:05:54 AM »

Actually, there's a pretty big difference between of poll of "what should I do first" and "what should I do last."

News:

Poll

Which article would you like to see next?

Author Topic: You Pick The Card For The Next Design/Development Article (Read 4953 times)

Chronic Apathy

Rawrlolsauce!

browarod

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!

Chronic Apathy

Chronic Apathy

Chronic Apathy

Chronic Apathy