New meta d9 giant band off Hebron??
Fascinating. I'm always a fan of interesting in-game decisions and flexibility, although a couple of these might be fairly locked in as far as which side sees play in certain decks.
I didn't see Zion's Unity at first so I thought it was going to be a staple. As it is, more Throne buffs! Yaaaaayyy?..
Just for clarification, you CANNOT block with an EC held in a fort, correct? You can only enter/exit during prep?
I wonder if this'll bring Shipwreck back into the meta...
My prediction for #7 is that it's Moabite, possibly Kir. No idea what it'll do - gotta see more Moabites to make that prediction ;) - but it would make sense since it seems like that theme seems to be seeing some print this year.
I see you there, Raining Fire.
So what are the deck building rules for these when it comes to T2?
Since cities count as both fortresses can I have 5 of the same city per (100-card) deck (2 as sites and 3 more as fortresses) or only 2 (count like sites) or 3 (count like fortresses) or 1 (follow the DAC count the brigades rule)?
Do cities count as neutral or evil or both evil and neutral (DAC rules)?
Does Zion work when you have no Heroes or does it require at least one Hero for Unity to turn on?
Does Zion work when you have no Heroes or does it require at least one Hero for Unity to turn on?
So what are the deck building rules for these when it comes to T2?
Since cities count as both fortresses can I have 5 of the same city per (100-card) deck (2 as sites and 3 more as fortresses) or only 2 (count like sites) or 3 (count like fortresses) or 1 (follow the DAC count the brigades rule)?
Do cities count as neutral or evil/good or both evil/good and neutral (DAC rules)?
Cities would count as good or evil (like Covenants and Curses).
Cities would count as good or evil (like Covenants and Curses).
A. Weren't Covenants and Curses changed to be neutral?
B. If you play a City as it's site half is it not a neutral card since its a site?
In his article John alluded to revealing the 2nd UR from FoM. Has anyone figured out the first one that has already been spoiled?
Good guess, but it's not Kir. It is a reprint though
In his article John alluded to revealing the 2nd UR from FoM. Has anyone figured out the first one that has already been spoiled?
Is it Adam? I bet it's Adam. Doesn't look like we've seen a borderless and he has the coolest border.
Good guess, but it's not Kir. It is a reprint though
Hmm... Hormah, maybe? To go with the Genesis stuff?
calling it now, Pit of Dothan.
In his article John alluded to revealing the 2nd UR from FoM. Has anyone figured out the first one that has already been spoiled?
In his article John alluded to revealing the 2nd UR from FoM. Has anyone figured out the first one that has already been spoiled?
Is it the Fall of Man Curse?
calling it now, Pit of Dothan.
Pit of Dothan was a... City?
...I was just thinking of sites to reprint lol :doh:
...I was just thinking of sites to reprint lol :doh:
You've been duped. John did say it's a reprint. He didn't say it's a reprint of a Site. ::)
Love the new card type! With Shipwreck out there though, it would be nice for a way to protect them...
Love the new card type! With Shipwreck out there though, it would be nice for a way to protect them...
Nothing is sacred. Everything is vulnerable. But that includes Shipwreck too. This new card might help if you play some of these Cities as a Site, including the other UR John alluded too.
Seems there's a Lot of hidden spoilers in that article that people haven't found yet... ::)
Seems there's a Lot of hidden spoilers in that article that people haven't found yet... ::)
Those are awesome! Were those changed recently? When i was on there at 8 this morning, i only saw the older versions of those cards...
Those are awesome! Were those changed recently? When i was on there at 8 this morning, i only saw the older versions of those cards...
They hid them in the punctuation.
The name of the new UR has been mentioned in this thread. If someone can tell me if it's good or evil and it's brigade I'll post the imageAll right, I'll bite.
Assuming that it's a reprint of a non-site, and that it's Genesis (as per Gabe's hints), I think it's likely Babel, an evil fort and blue (for Abraham) site. It was last printed as an enhancement in Pats, and would have a Genesis 11 reference. (Also URs tend to be big, recognizable things, which this fits).
The name of the new UR has been mentioned in this thread. If someone can tell me if it's good or evil and it's brigade I'll post the imageAll right, I'll bite.
Assuming that it's a reprint of a non-site, and that it's Genesis (as per Gabe's hints), I think it's likely Babel, an evil fort and blue (for Abraham) site. It was last printed as an enhancement in Pats, and would have a Genesis 11 reference. (Also URs tend to be big, recognizable things, which this fits).
Otherwise I could see Goshen (Genesis 45:10; probably evil Egyptian and either blue for Joe or gold for Moses).
I'm getting a bit concerned with the amount of free splashable Reserve access in this set.
I'm getting a bit concerned with the amount of free splashable Reserve access in this set.
Look on the bright side - it always negates Fire foxes and usually Uzzah. Much as I love my splashable chump blocks, cutting down on them is good for the game. (Though if I'm being honest it probably just means that humble's gonna be more of a staple than ever)
I'm getting a bit concerned with the amount of free splashable Reserve access in this set.
Look on the bright side - it always negates Fire foxes and usually Uzzah. Much as I love my splashable chump blocks, cutting down on them is good for the game. (Though if I'm being honest it probably just means that humble's gonna be more of a staple than ever)
I'm getting a bit concerned with the amount of free splashable Reserve access in this set.
Look on the bright side - it always negates Fire foxes and usually Uzzah. Much as I love my splashable chump blocks, cutting down on them is good for the game. (Though if I'm being honest it probably just means that humble's gonna be more of a staple than ever)
I'm talking about the site side. The Fortress side is great. It also doesn't matter most of the time against Uzzah and Foxes because Humble is almost always active for the defensive player.
I'm getting a bit concerned with the amount of free splashable Reserve access in this set.
Look on the bright side - it always negates Fire foxes and usually Uzzah. Much as I love my splashable chump blocks, cutting down on them is good for the game. (Though if I'm being honest it probably just means that humble's gonna be more of a staple than ever)
I'm talking about the site side. The Fortress side is great. It also doesn't matter most of the time against Uzzah and Foxes because Humble is almost always active for the defensive player.
Can you sacrifice the fort side to use the site?
Joshua (CoW) and at least one new Hero will take a Site/City and use it against you. There's a certain amount of risk/reward with playing a Site these days.
Your comments seems based on what you know now. Looking only at the current card pool, Babel is a must have for me today. But with almost 70 new cards that can access the Reserve about to be added to the pool that won't aways be the case.
That being said, Babel is amazing which is one of the reasons it was chosen as an UR.
That's assuming I don't Covet your Humble... :o
Since DASs are being called Cities and DAAs are called Covenants/Curses, is there any plan to have a name for DACs besides just DAC?
Wow! Has that art ever been used on a card? Incredible.
With all these spoilers coming out, when are we going to get a release date? Need to know how much time I have to save up for cards...
That's assuming I don't Covet your Humble... :o
Who has it to pre-order?
When I spoiled this guy (http://www.cactusforums.com/redemption-card-play/new-card-type-spoiled-on-land-of-redemption-today!/msg580709/#msg580709) I probably should have included this:
When I spoiled this guy (http://www.cactusforums.com/redemption-card-play/new-card-type-spoiled-on-land-of-redemption-today!/msg580709/#msg580709) I probably should have included this:
Joshua (CoW) and at least one new Hero will take a Site/City and use it against you. There's a certain amount of risk/reward with playing a Site these days.
Hasn't this already been true? :PWhen I spoiled this guy (http://www.cactusforums.com/redemption-card-play/new-card-type-spoiled-on-land-of-redemption-today!/msg580709/#msg580709) I probably should have included this:
Joshua Captain: Beast mode confirmed