Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
My hubby and I were playing and I won the battle. He starts to hand me the lost soul and then throws the dominant Burial on the table which states "Discard any Lost Soul in play". He then grabbed the Lost Soul and discarded it. Is that legal? Because at that time it was a redeemed Soul. Also could you use that card on any Redeemed Souls? I'm assuming NO because they are not in play.Thanks for your help.
LOL...I just caught the last response. He had just pulled the lost soul and put it on the middle of the table and then slapped down the dominant on top of it. We play for ...blood. He had a nasty white enhancement that he tried to play during that battle (sorry, I can't remember the name) that would have forced me to discard my hand and draw an entirely new one. Fortunately I had a nice enhancement that allowed me to look in his hand and discard a white enhancement (among other things). He was ... unable to play that enhancement...LOLOL...Love it!!!
Okay... Lamborgini I don't think is corrrect 100%. If you're in a battle and you die by the NUMBERS, you CANNOT play dominants at that point. It goes to battle resolution.If you are in a battle and are being removed by an ABILITY, then you can play dominants before handing over the lost soul.There's a BIG difference between the two.
While that is true, Dominants do have to wait for instant actions to finish. Battle Resolution is instant.
I'm confused...I thought dominants could be played at any time.
I guess the better question would have been when does a LS become redeemed? We had already discarded our enhancements and such. He put out the LS in the middle of the table, but before I could get my grubby little paws on it, he put down the dominant. His other two LS were guarded by sites I didn't have access to.
All enhancements played during the Battle Phase (except set-aside or weapon-class enhancements, or cards placed on other cards during battle) are discarded to the respective owner’s discard pile. Assuming no dominants are played during Battle Resolution to prevent it, the rescue attempt is successful, and your opponent must select and surrender to you one available Lost Soul from his Land of Bondage.
As such, he should have played Burial then, rather than playing it when he did since that violates the "select and surrender" clause. He selected, but didn't surrender.
First question is if i go for a battle attempt and win then lay harvest time i get a ls?second if my opponent goes for a ra and lays angle of the lord i die then lay chriasten m. does it count as a succesfull block, i no playing cm is a succssesful block but is it if he angel of the lords me first??
First question, no, in the battle challenge you've already died by numbers, so you can't play dominants. It's battle resolution.
dirty deeds done dirt cheap
Quote from: crustpope on May 22, 2009, 09:54:02 AMMy opponents have used this against me all the time. You may have done this against me before. I know Soul Seeker has. I play babylonian Banquet hall or DoU to discard all LS and then they play HT to win a LS after they are all gone. Or I die by the numbers then play my Sog/NJ on a shuffler to protect the rescue and they play HT to pull out the hopper to rescue it.With the evil discards, the battle does not immediately end just because a character is (instantly) discarded. After a discard, you can play Unknown Nation or Madness to bring another EC in and continue your block. There is a lot of breathing room at the tail end of a battle to utilize specials on Arts and Dominants.The technical order of resolution for your numbers example, is that while your EC is in battle but still losing, you rescue your LS to take them off the table, the opponent plays his HT, and you are still in a losing situation. The important thing to remember about being at a numerical disadvantage, is that numbers (generally) determine initiative, they do not instantly discard a character. A character down in numbers does not die until the battle is completely over and you are doing cleanup.Treat SoG and Harvest Time the same way you treat CM or AotL. 98% of the time, you're basically throwing them out at the end of a battle to alter the outcome before you close the door. But for the 2% of the time when the order matters, it is important to remember that all of these cards are played during - not after - the battle phase has ended. Number-dead guys are discarded after - not during - the battle. You (technically) cannot declare the battle over and then Bury the LS, the proper order is that you bury, then your guy dies. Similarly, the opponent cannot play Harvest Time and tell you that it's too late to respond because you already let your guy die. HT must be played during the battle phase for this scenario, so your EC is still technically in-battle-and-losing, and you have an opportunity to respond, with Burial or DoU or whatever.
My opponents have used this against me all the time. You may have done this against me before. I know Soul Seeker has. I play babylonian Banquet hall or DoU to discard all LS and then they play HT to win a LS after they are all gone. Or I die by the numbers then play my Sog/NJ on a shuffler to protect the rescue and they play HT to pull out the hopper to rescue it.
The battle is completely over when you are losing (not mutual) and you choose not to play anything. Even if that weren't the case, either you have a LS and HT doesn't work, or your EC is Discarded during resolution, triggering Hormah, and it's too late to HT.
First question is if i go for a battle attempt and win then lay harvest time i can go for a rescue attempt after?second if my opponent goes for a ra and lays aotl i die then lay chriasten m. does it count as a succesfull block, i no playing cm is a succssesful block but is it if he angel of the lords me first??
I got this from the Hormah thread. It was ruled that once the character died by numbers, hormah would work because it's a trigger, but harvest time COULD NOT be played. Tim Maly, Gabe Isbell and others comfirmed that on the thread. I'm 100% sure about this.
because I dont know any respectable person who would accept a battle challenge and then not drop a CBN battle winner to totally Pwn the hero.
In all seriousness, no one should ever loose a battle challenge on defense anyway because a smart person would make sure that the B/C is going to end WAY in thier favor, if not he/she should decline it so in reality this is all complete conjecture because I dont know any respectable person who would accept a battle challenge and then not drop a CBN battle winner to totally Pwn the hero.
Quote from: crustpope on August 26, 2009, 10:52:33 AMIn all seriousness, no one should ever loose a battle challenge on defense anyway because a smart person would make sure that the B/C is going to end WAY in thier favor, if not he/she should decline it so in reality this is all complete conjecture because I dont know any respectable person who would accept a battle challenge and then not drop a CBN battle winner to totally Pwn the hero.I loved when I got battle challenged. That meant I could block with Galba! I don't care so much if I win the battle challenge, I just want to dehand them. Sabbath Breaker too, and not just in multiplayer.