Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => Topic started by: Gabe on April 24, 2018, 07:57:40 AM
-
If you haven’t been to LoR yet today there’s a new post you won’t want to miss! (http://landofredemption.com/?p=7929) Nathan has given us a side by side comparison between the previewed version and the final version of every FoM card!
Thanks, Nathan!
-
A very impressive set!
-
Just out of curiosity, it looks like the dual-brigade cards were switched so that the colors were in alphabetical order. Was this the reason they were changed and if so is there a reason Corrupted Temple and Envy were kept the same?
-
Just out of curiosity, it looks like the dual-brigade cards were switched so that the colors were in alphabetical order. Was this the reason they were changed and if so is there a reason Corrupted Temple and Envy were kept the same?
We try to be consistent with our layout. One way to do that is to have the brigades arranged the same each time. One of the people helping us proof noticed that we were inconsistent on a few of the multi-brigade cards. The two brigade cards are easy to keep consistent if we arrange them alphabetically. Cards with 3 brigades are a bit trickier. Two light brigades look much better with a darker brigade between them than they do stacked on top of one another (and vice versa).
-
It looked to me like they were changed to allow for white numbers wherever possible.
-
It looked to me like they were changed to allow for white numbers wherever possible.
It appears that way because the numbers are black by default. The previous color arrangement was selected in such a way that the color of the numbers wouldn’t need to be changed.
-
Well either way it's better than half black/white numbers on the same side :P
-
Will the 4 cards that only have the warrior class symbol on one side receive an errata now that the symbol doesn't apply to the whole card?
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
-
Will the 4 cards that only have the warrior class symbol on one side receive an errata now that the symbol doesn't apply to the whole card?
Did i miss something?
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
Basically, does the evil side of King Abijam, King Saul & Joab get to be warrior class, or not because the symbol isn't below the evil side.
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
Basically, does the evil side of King Abijam, King Saul & Joab get to be warrior class, or not because the symbol isn't below the evil side.
Gotcha thanks!!
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
Basically, does the evil side of King Abijam, King Saul & Joab get to be warrior class, or not because the symbol isn't below the evil side.
Wait, i thought there were weapon symbols on some of the EEs?
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
Basically, does the evil side of King Abijam, King Saul & Joab get to be warrior class, or not because the symbol isn't below the evil side.
Wait, i thought there were weapon symbols on some of the EEs?
All of the dual-alignment enhancements are fine because the icon boxes were on the same side previously. The class icon change only affects those 4 characters.
-
We will be discussing that and hopefully have an answer before FoM officially releases.
Until FoM releases, the current rules will remain in place (icons apply to the whole card).
:miss:
Basically, does the evil side of King Abijam, King Saul & Joab get to be warrior class, or not because the symbol isn't below the evil side.
For clarity, I forgot who the other character was. So the question is basically saying, does the Warrior Class only pertain to the left side of the following 4 characters:
King Abijam (Rock of Ages, tin #26)
King Saul (Cloud of Witnesses)
Joab (Cloud of Witnesses)
Roman Jailer (Early Church)