Author Topic: Babylonian D  (Read 2727 times)

Offline Crashfach2002

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+145)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3057
    • -
    • East Central Region
Babylonian D
« on: November 18, 2009, 03:55:10 PM »
0
I saw on the boards in the last couple of days where someone stated that Crimson Babylonian defense was good a site lock out.  Is that more, well the Babylonian sites are good for site lock out or is crimson actually a decent site lock out defense?  I thinking more the sites than brigade.

Offline acree3

  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 201
  • ROLL TIDE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2009, 04:28:11 PM »
0
The bab baniunt hall wit bab sites is a strong site lock out theme. The carecters and enhansments them selves foucous on capture wich does nit work with site lockout!
ROLL TIDE !!!!!!!!!!

Offline lightningninja

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5397
  • I'm Watchful Servant, and I'm broken.
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2009, 04:32:11 PM »
0
They have Saphira who negates which is useful. The enhancement midianites attack does the same thing, negates. Mask of Vanity takes a site. Set Fire kills either a site or a fortress every turn. There are a few cards that make your opponent have to discard a card from hand or give you a site. Overall, it's pretty useful, not to mention Nergalsharezzer and his horses, making cards that steal your sites cbn. They also just got a new weapon class enhancement that helps to get rid of sites but I don't remember the ability. I think it's something like they have to discard a fortress or discard a site.
As a national champion, I support ReyZen deck pouches.

Offline Crashfach2002

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+145)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3057
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2009, 06:46:15 PM »
0
OK, so I knew it was a great def. against site lock out, but not a good site lock def.  Just wanted to see what others thought!

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2009, 07:10:20 PM »
0
They have Saphira who negates which is useful. The enhancement midianites attack does the same thing, negates. Mask of Vanity takes a site. Set Fire kills either a site or a fortress every turn. There are a few cards that make your opponent have to discard a card from hand or give you a site. Overall, it's pretty useful, not to mention Nergalsharezzer and his horses, making cards that steal your sites cbn. They also just got a new weapon class enhancement that helps to get rid of sites but I don't remember the ability. I think it's something like they have to discard a fortress or discard a site.

Axe- discard a fortress in opponent's territory. Opponent may discard a site instead
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Offline Crashfach2002

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+145)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3057
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2009, 07:35:58 PM »
0
If they don't have a fortress, then they have to discard a site, right?

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2009, 07:40:38 PM »
0
If they don't have a fortress, then they have to discard a site, right?
They only discard a Site if they choose to instead of a Fortress. They aren't required to discard a Site if they don't have a Fortress (I don't think).

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Babylonian D
« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2009, 07:46:52 PM »
0
If they don't have a fortress, then they have to discard a site, right?
They only discard a Site if they choose to instead of a Fortress. They aren't required to discard a Site if they don't have a Fortress (I don't think).
I agree.  The word "instead" infers that a valid fortress target must exist.  The site discard is only an option if they choose to not discard a fort.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal