Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Playgroup and Tournament Central => Redemption® Official Tournaments => Topic started by: everytribe on May 18, 2014, 02:44:45 PM
-
NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL TOURNAMENT
Date: July 18-19, 2014
Location: North Heights Lutheran Church (Gym)
1700 West Highway 96
Arden Hills, MN 55112
Registration Fee: $10.00
Open Categories Free
All Closed - $10.00 (Booster Draft will be Classic-L,P,A,Pat,K,Priest and Disciples or Treasures)
Doors will open around 5:00pm Friday and 8:00am Saturday for deck check-in. Play will start at 6pm and 9am respectively.
Free lodging at the church.
Tentative Schedule: (subject to change based on number of players)
Category Rounds Scheduled Time
Sealed - 2 player 4 Fri 6pm-10:00pm
Type 2 - Multiplayer 2 Fri 6pm-9:00 pm
Type 2 - 2 player 3 Sat 9pm-2:30pm
Type 1 - 2 player 6 Sat 9am-3:30pm
Type A - 2 player 5 Sat 9am-2:30pm
Type 1 - Multiplayer 3 Sat 4pm-8pm
Booster Draft 3 Sat 4pm-8pm
Teams 3 Sat 4pm-8pm
Any Questions PM everytribe(Bill Voigt)
-
If plane tickets are not outrageous and I have a spot to sleep I'll try to be there.
-
Wish I could be there. :)
-
I planned to go to at least one tournament this year, but I have concert tickets to my favorite band that weekend and it's the weekend right after my birthday, so I might be a little busy :(.
-
Nats is at westys house, go to that
-
Westy just might win his first National Championship since he has home field advantage.
-
If plane tickets are not outrageous and I have a spot to sleep I'll try to be there.
Definitely free lodging at the church Friday night. If you needed a place to stay Thursday or Saturday night we could probably work something out.
-
Westy just might win his first National Championship since he has home field advantage.
lol funny not gonna happen haha
-
Details in first post.
-
I'll see if I can get if off work, but I already need to take that Wednesday off, and it'd make it less likely I'd get Nats off... but we'll see.
-
See everybody tomorrow. Doors will open at 5:00pm. Play starts at 6:00pm. Perkins run at 10:30pm
-
My excel is not able to support the spread sheet for running tournaments because it is not up to date. If someone has a PC with a spreadsheet that works and would be willing to bring it Tomorrow night that would be great!
-
My excel is not able to support the spread sheet for running tournaments because it is not up to date. If someone has a PC with a spreadsheet that works and would be willing to bring it Tomorrow night that would be great!
Will do.
-
RESULTS
Closed Deck 2-player
First: Justin Alstad
Second: Noah Wagenknecht
Third: Peter Wenderlick
Booster Draft
First: Britta Alstad
Second: Jordan Alstad
Third: Josh O’Neill
Type 1 - 2-player
First: Jordan Alstad
Second: Noah Wagenknecht
Third: David Carlson
Type 1 Multi-Player
First: Noah Wagenknecht
Second: Tim Maly
Third: Noah Peterson
Type 1 - Teams
First: Justin Alstad and Jayden Alstad
Second: Nathan Voigt and Martin Miller
Third: Doug Weber ands David Carlson
Type 2 – 2-Player
First: Jayden Alstad
Second: Johnathan Wagenknecht
Third: Justin Alstad
Type 2 – Multi-Player
First: Nathan Voigt
Tie for Second: Jordan Alstad and Jayden Alstad
Type A - 2-player
First: Arianna Turnidge
Second: Nathan O’Neill
Third: Noah Peterson
-
Be prepared to play against a little defense when you come to Nationals this year for type 1 - 2 player. Top 5 were balanced or heavy defensive decks.
EXAMPLES
Jordan Alstad Vs Tim Maly: Timed out win for Jordan 1-0
David Carlson Vs Jordan Alstad: 1-1 Tie
-
Bill, I think you may have gotten some of the Wagenknechts confused because unless Noah was playing two categories at once, I don't think he could've placed in T1 2P and T2 2P.
-
Yeah, I believe it was Jonathan Wagenknect who played in T2 and placed second.
-
Just a typo. I had it right on the Tournament winners list. Thanks for catching it. They do look alike. How do we really know which one played what category?
-
How do we really know which one played what category?
:laugh: True enough!
-
Type A - 2-player
First: Arianna Turnidge
That name...the next Belle Reuter?
Has Jordan really come over to the dark side of T1? I mean, the metagame is way more healthy than T2, but still...
-
Type A - 2-player
First: Arianna Turnidge
That name...the next Belle Reuter?
Has Jordan really come over to the dark side of T1? I mean, the metagame is way more healthy than T2, but still...
Surprisingly there were only four Type A players so competition wasn't all too difficult however it's possible.
Well, Jordan played T1 at States because it wasn't paired against anything and he played T1 at East Central Regs because it wasn't paired with T2 2P and since he won both T1 and T2 2 player at East Central he played Type 1 2P at North Central because it evened out the numbers.
-
I mean, the metagame is way more healthy than T2, but still...
I agree the T1 metagame is at a really good place, but the T2 meta is also really good right now. Most games were very competitive and there was definitely variety in decks being used.
6 players (I used 2 decks):
Judges/Assyrians/Magicians
Disciples/Magicians
Disciples/Egyptians
Judges/Priests/Gates of Jerusalem
Genesis/Egyptians
WC Banding/Pharisees
Disciples/Priests/Assyrians/Magicians
Obviously some common themes, but no two decks exactly alike. 8)
-
As the only Iowan representative at the tourney, I just want to say thank you to everyone there for the welcoming environment. I had a lot of fun and look forward to seeing you all again at Nats. Also, Bill, I think I may have gotten Potiphar's Wife mixed up in the cards that I was trading with you...it may have happened when that group of cards got thrown in the wrong pile. I don't want to complain since I already know I got a great deal, but I'm just curious if you see her in there so I don't go crazy searching my cards for it. Thanks again.
-
Just because the decks aren't alike doesn't mean the metagame is in a good place. :)
-
Also consider that first and second were both using disciples, making Westy a little more correct, although I think I agree more with Justin than with Westy.
-
Just because the decks aren't alike doesn't mean the metagame is in a good place. :)
I guess I'm just curious as to why you think that... :P
Also consider that first and second were both using disciples, making Westy a little more correct.
True, but your Disciple deck beat the second place one 7-0 and my Judges/Priests deck would have beat yours had I been able to draw one more card...
-
my Judges/Priests deck would have beat yours
But it didn't... ;)
-
Hay guys I'm missing a FOOF tin with 2 maroon sleeves in it. It also says sleeves on the bottom in red marker.