I support censorship.
Help Stop American Internet Censorship: http://americancensorship.org/ (http://americancensorship.org/)<a style="width:400px;height:100px;vertical-align:middle;text-align:center;background-color:#000;position:absolute;z-index:5555;top:50px;left:50px;background-image:url(http://americancensorship.org/images/stop-censorship-small.png);background-position:center center;background-repeat:no-repeat;" href="http://americancensorship.org"></a> is the code to add a cencorship shortcut to a web site, Perhaps you could add one on Redemption Connect
Help Stop American Internet Censorship: http://americancensorship.org/ (http://americancensorship.org/)<a style="width:400px;height:100px;vertical-align:middle;text-align:center;background-color:#000;position:absolute;z-index:5555;top:50px;left:50px;background-image:url(http://americancensorship.org/images/stop-censorship-small.png);background-position:center center;background-repeat:no-repeat;" href="http://americancensorship.org"></a> is the code to add a cencorship shortcut to a web site, Perhaps you could add one on Redemption Connect
Like a bossHelp Stop American Internet Censorship: http://americancensorship.org/ (http://americancensorship.org/)<a style="width:400px;height:100px;vertical-align:middle;text-align:center;background-color:#000;position:absolute;z-index:5555;top:50px;left:50px;background-image:url(http://americancensorship.org/images/stop-censorship-small.png);background-position:center center;background-repeat:no-repeat;" href="http://americancensorship.org"></a> is the code to add a cencorship shortcut to a web site, Perhaps you could add one on Redemption Connect
Already did.
This is dangerously close to turning into another "should Christians force their morality on people" debate.If anything, this debate is "Corporations vs. People"
This is dangerously close to turning into another "should Christians force their morality on people" debate.If anything, this debate is "Corporations vs. People"
We should censor anyone who doesn't agree with me.
We should censor anyone who doesn't agree with me.
Reported for being dangerously close to causing irreparable damage to our beloved community. How dare you threaten us with your talk of irresponsible censorship. You should have your tongue cut out boy.
This is why I'm a minimalist with the goverment.
This is why I'm a minimalist with the goverment.
That's actually not true if you believe in no legal abortions or banning homosexual marriages.
Then is there no difference between a "minimalist" and an anarchist? After all, the minimum of anything is zero. Phrases like "minimalist" are too vague, in my opinion, because almost everyone agrees that government should do SOMETHING. We just don't agree on what those "minimal" things are.This is why I'm a minimalist with the goverment.
That's actually not true if you believe in no legal abortions or banning homosexual marriages.
1 - Minimalism refers to the elimination of everything unnecessary, so unless you believe everything is unnecessary, it would not equate to your idea of anarchy.Well we're arguing semantics then, which is pointless. "Minimalism" has its origins in art and music forms, but we're now using it in political speech. I think we are agreeing actually. I'm just saying that where the bar is set for what constitutes "minimal government" will change with every person that you speak to, making it, in my opinion, a rather useless phrase. It's like me saying I'm for "smaller government", but at the same time I wish that on MY pet issues the government played an even larger role than it currently does. Instead I think we need to be more specific on what we'd like to be cut and what we'd like to see increased, otherwise we are rightly accused by Alex and others of just cherry-picking our favorite issues while we scream for "minimal" government intervention.
2 - Anarchy does not mean lawlessness.
This is all pretty irrelevant since every opinion exceptFTFYmineThe Mods is going to be deleted pretty soon.
Guys, this is here to raise awareness of an awful idea. Please keep all posts on that, rather than the definition of minimalism.Agree Censoring is just a bad Idea for all involved
Guys, this is here to raise awareness of an awful idea. Please keep all posts on that, rather than the definition of minimalism.
I support censorship. ;)Either YMT's snapped and started trolling, or there's some alternate definition of censorship I've missed.
I'm a parent of a teenage boy. I support censorship. :o
I'm a parent of a teenage boy. I support censorship. :o
No offense, but censor your child yourself. Don't push that job upon the government and the rest of us.
I'm a parent of a teenage boy. I support censorship. :o
No offense, but censor your child yourself. Don't push that job upon the government and the rest of us.
No offense taken, since that was the type of censorship I was referring to. ;)
you will never stop piracy. ever. the only thing they can do with this bile is block domain names, you can still get to the sites by using their IP addresses. the only thing this bill will accomplish is the complete destruction of the DNS system. Have fun typing in 69.171.24.11 every time you want to check your facebook kids.Yep. I use OpenDNS to block both ads and other objectionable content. However, I won't be allowed to do so if this bill passes.
That is ironic.you will never stop piracy. ever. the only thing they can do with this bile is block domain names, you can still get to the sites by using their IP addresses. the only thing this bill will accomplish is the complete destruction of the DNS system. Have fun typing in 69.171.24.11 every time you want to check your facebook kids.Yep. I use OpenDNS to block both ads and other objectionable content. However, I won't be allowed to do so if this bill passes.
Any Development on this?
The MPAA and RIAA are powerful lobbies with lots of connections on Capitol Hill. I'm hoping they get shot down, as my entire career depends on this not being passed.
This is so stupid!= most government/poloitical thinking
I support censorship.
Kinda like the fact that in some states, you need one form of ID to buy a gun, but two forms if you want to pay with a check.
Kinda like the fact that in some states, you need one form of ID to buy a gun, but two forms if you want to pay with a check.
Maybe because you don't have a Constitutional right to a checking account?
Well he did promise "hope and change" I guess this would be the change by making us more like China.Funny you should blame this on Obama, who has publicly stated he'd veto the bill.
Well he did promise "hope and change" I guess this would be the change by making us more like China.Obama not only has nothing to do with this bill, but has already stated he would veto this if it passed. People really need to start learning that congress has a lot more power that the president.
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi680.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fvv161%2Fdartfrog_bucket%2Fthe-right-to-arm-bears-demotivation.jpg&hash=325b8eb05b1c72fd61cbaf830842dd36e1329a0a)
If you can teach that thing how to aim and pull the trigger then I would gladly send it to war. I think we might win based on shear intimidation.
He saying that so people won't think he's behind it. Don't you rember what Bush 41 said "Read my lips, No new taxes." He made more taxes so don't believe everything a politician says.Just saying that he's against it cost him millions in contributions. He's already sacrificed for this bill.
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fstatic.fjcdn.com%2Fpictures%2FSoviet_000300_1223196.jpg&hash=927947dfb110377dde8503157a8c749e44558b6c)(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi680.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fvv161%2Fdartfrog_bucket%2Fthe-right-to-arm-bears-demotivation.jpg&hash=325b8eb05b1c72fd61cbaf830842dd36e1329a0a)
If you can teach that thing how to aim and pull the trigger then I would gladly send it to war. I think we might win based on shear intimidation.
I know they have more power, but still you can always trust what they sayWell he did promise "hope and change" I guess this would be the change by making us more like China.Obama not only has nothing to do with this bill, but has already stated he would veto this if it passed. People really need to start learning that congress has a lot more power that the president.
so don't believe everything a politician says.
I know they have more power, but still you can always trust what they [politicians] sayAre you by any chance a politician?
I ment to put can't there. That was a typo. No I am not a politician and never want to be oneIncidentally, my father retired a few years ago. He's had a lifelong interest in politics, and so when there was an opening at the county level, he decided to run, and won. He also promised that he'd arrive here (my college) around 3PM on Sunday. Should I not trust him?
I said you can't always, not that you can never trust them. Those are two very different statements right there. The kind I was talking about were the washington dc politicians, not local or county ones.I ment to put can't there. That was a typo. No I am not a politician and never want to be oneIncidentally, my father retired a few years ago. He's had a lifelong interest in politics, and so when there was an opening at the county level, he decided to run, and won. He also promised that he'd arrive here (my college) around 3PM on Sunday. Should I not trust him?
/Making sweeping statements is fun!
Kinda like the fact that in some states, you need one form of ID to buy a gun, but two forms if you want to pay with a check.
Maybe because you don't have a Constitutional right to a checking account?
Guns can be used in murder. I've never heard of anyone killed with a $50 bill. (Someone will inevitably find a story somewhere on google where someone was drowned in nickels or something, and I welcome you to post that story because it would be a hilarious read, but you get my point) Do I think that ALL guns should be extremely tightely regulated? No. I would like it to be a little harder to get anything that can't be used in practical situations, such as hunting or defending yourself, but other than that I think one form of ID and a background check is okay for shot guns and pistols. If you're buying an assualt rifle or an AK-47, I am a little worried and might want to run some more checks.
Anyway the MPAA released a statement yesterday that made them look like (more of) idiots. I'm going to put it in a spoiler tag because the title of the article does contain a synonym for butt.
I was never saying it was a party platform issue. I was going by his record do far. For example he said that within a year of his term Gitmo would be shut down, and is it shut down no it is still open.
So you make a general sweeping statement, and then when presented with facts to the contrary, change your position? Hmm, sounds like the aforementioned H.W. Bush, and many other politicians (including many now about SOPA/PIPA)I said you can't always, not that you can never trust them. Those are two very different statements right there. The kind I was talking about were the washington dc politicians, not local or county ones.I ment to put can't there. That was a typo. No I am not a politician and never want to be oneIncidentally, my father retired a few years ago. He's had a lifelong interest in politics, and so when there was an opening at the county level, he decided to run, and won. He also promised that he'd arrive here (my college) around 3PM on Sunday. Should I not trust him?
/Making sweeping statements is fun!
And I do not expect them to keep every promise they make only a idiot would, plus I didn't even vote for the moron in the first place.
But I say, if you are even angry with someone, you are subject to judgment! If you call someone an idiot [aka moron], you are in danger of being brought before the court. And if you curse someone, you are in danger of the fires of hell.
Again you are saying that I said never trust a politician. How about you actually read what I type first. Besides most local ones tend to keep their word better than the higher up ones are less trustworthy.
And I do not expect them to keep every promise they make only a idiot would, plus I didn't even vote for the moron in the first place.
That's epic. Where do you get all that stuff?
Meanwhile at Anon HQLove that meme. So many uses.
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa.static.memegenerator.net%2Fcache%2Finstances%2F400x%2F12%2F13092%2F13406250.jpg&hash=ea84071c6a3d3abae5539dff0f67f5ae9f3fdfe3)
Basically the government tried to close off the Internet mafia's territory and the Internet mafia is fighting to defend itself?Yeah. It's quite clear the Megaupload was punitive.
BMI just went down as well. I also just got a report that a total of 10 sites are down. Trying to find out what the other 4 are
Edit: Whitehouse.gov is the next target
But Obama's against it....
BMI just went down as well. I also just got a report that a total of 10 sites are down. Trying to find out what the other 4 are
Edit: Whitehouse.gov is the next target
If I keep refreshing my page at whitehouse.gov, will that help the ddos? ::)
https://twitter.com/AnonDaily/statuses/160148067025289216...404. Unless that was the joke.
lol good joke
It's still up, I saw it.Huh, I tried again and it worked. Guess I copied wrong the first time.
Bye bye warner music groupOH THE HUMANITY!
Anonymous had restored MegaUpload's streaming video service but the server seems to have crashed.In other words....Nothing changed!
Anonymous had restored MegaUpload's streaming video service but the server seems to have crashed.In other words....Nothing changed!