I'm trying not to read any articles until after I've seen it at least a second time to cement my own ideas. But I'll keep it in mind.
my only complaints are the holes in the movie, as well as the science never explained since i am a sucker for the science
Hole: the totems. She made it then it was never shown again. What is the point? a concept that vanished from the movie
no science: it never actually said HOW people got in the other's dream. so strange. also the moment one realizes they are in a dream, their conscience becomes active (called lucid dreaming) and they can make the dream into whatever they want. They should have at least thrown SOMETHING in there to explain the whole idea. All they used was theoretics :P
Anyone else see Inception yet? It's by far one of the best movies I've seen and it has earned its place as #2 on my favorite movie list, only behind #1 which is The Dark Knight coincidentally.in my top ten for sure, but Batman Begins is definitely my number 1. TDK is #5.
dude BB stunkAnyone else see Inception yet? It's by far one of the best movies I've seen and it has earned its place as #2 on my favorite movie list, only behind #1 which is The Dark Knight coincidentally.in my top ten for sure, but Batman Begins is definitely my number 1. TDK is #5.
LIES. it had ninjas, awesome character development, ninjas, an intense enemy (fear itself), ninjas, music by Hans Zimmer, ninjas, Alfred. and NINJAZZZZdude BB suckedAnyone else see Inception yet? It's by far one of the best movies I've seen and it has earned its place as #2 on my favorite movie list, only behind #1 which is The Dark Knight coincidentally.in my top ten for sure, but Batman Begins is definitely my number 1. TDK is #5.
That would be great if I could see what was going onLIES. it had ninjas, awesome character development, ninjas, an intense enemy (fear itself), ninjas, music by Hans Zimmer, ninjas, Alfred. and NINJAZZZZdude BB suckedAnyone else see Inception yet? It's by far one of the best movies I've seen and it has earned its place as #2 on my favorite movie list, only behind #1 which is The Dark Knight coincidentally.in my top ten for sure, but Batman Begins is definitely my number 1. TDK is #5.
A. Bubbleboy doesn't suck. he's one pretty cool guy. B. They're ninjas. you aren't supposed to see them. duhh. and C. when was the last time you watched that movie? I've never had a problem with seeing what's happening.That would be great if I could see what was going ondude BB suckedLIES. it had ninjas, awesome character development, ninjas, an intense enemy (fear itself), ninjas, music by Hans Zimmer, ninjas, Alfred. and NINJAZZZZ
I saw it in IMAX last time though, and I don't want to cough up that money again, but if I don't it will look only half as good I am afraid.FWIW, unlike much of The Dark Knight, this wasn't shot on IMAX cameras... just normal 35mm ones. It may look better at its native resolution, unless you simply like the oversized screen. I had no complaints at 35mm.
A lot of things went on in Inception and I'm starting to lean towards disliking it... just like I dislike the Dark Knight <- (But that's because everyone hyped it up so much before I saw it. I ended up having super high expectations for it and was quite disappointed once I actually saw it).It was hyped up so much b/c it was one of the best movies ever made...
QuoteA lot of things went on in Inception and I'm starting to lean towards disliking it... just like I dislike the Dark Knight <- (But that's because everyone hyped it up so much before I saw it. I ended up having super high expectations for it and was quite disappointed once I actually saw it).It was hyped up so much b/c it was one of the best movies ever made...
Anyway I don't really see your point being valid on inception. It's about dreams, not a Philosophy IMO.
So because the movie reminded you of The Matrix you don't like it?
And everyone in the world but me seemed to like the Dark Knight, so don't fret.
QuoteAnd everyone in the world but me seemed to like the Dark Knight, so don't fret.
Finally! Someone else who agrees!
So what secret handshake are we going to have? What secret password? Or is it just not going to be a secret! :o
QuoteAnd everyone in the world but me seemed to like the Dark Knight, so don't fret.
Finally! Someone else who agrees!
QuoteAnd everyone in the world but me seemed to like the Dark Knight, so don't fret.
Finally! Someone else who agrees!
I guess you can call me a convert :P. I first loved the movie but after watching a movie that was soaked in prayer and I could see God working through it, I was convicted about how dark TDK was (plus a couple other movies I had). I ended up getting rid of them.
As for Inception, I was looking forward to it until I read about all the suicide parts (especially near the end). I lived with it for a long time so I don't like to watch movies that heavily involves it.
As for Inception, I was looking forward to it until I read about all the suicide parts (especially near the end).Go see it, don't go off someone else's opinion, especially if you wanted to originally see it. There was not suicide in it.
There was not suicide in it.
The thing you have to realize about christian media "reviewers" is that they will make a huge deal about anything and blow it way out of proportion.The thing you have to realize about Christian teenagers is that they will try to compartmentalize their lives so that they can lead lives of holiness in some areas, while in other areas they can continue to follow their natural desires instead of wanting God's best.
The thing you have to realize about christian media "reviewers" is that they will make a huge deal about anything and blow it way out of proportion.The thing you have to realize about Christian teenagers is that they will try to compartmentalize their lives so that they can lead lives of holiness in some areas, while in other areas they can continue to follow their natural desires instead of wanting God's best.
In order to not feel badly about this inconsistency in their lives they will try to minimize the sinfulness that is glorified in movies/games/music/etc. that they want to listen to, and will blow off the advice of Christian media reviewers and other more experienced Christians that God has put in their lives for them to learn from.
Too all who have seen Inception:
Is this true?
Do any characters (other than that one) commit suicide?
Does the movie actually encourage suicide?
Or does it show suicide as a horrible thing that ruins lives?
I've wrestled with severe depression and suicidal thoughts for years and I saw nothing that encourages suicide in the movie
that long post made me a bit sleepy but otherwise i'm wide awake ;)
Mr Hiatus:Did you actually see the movie?
Did you happen to read the entire review or just what was posted? If you haven't read the whole thing, then you can't really judge it.
Also, some people do go do something fun one last time before committing suicide. There is a girl who desiced to do one last fun thing before commiting suicide so she went to a Skillet concert. After hearing the song "Last Night", she gave her life to Christ. The point of the story (for this discussion anyways) is that you can never say for certain what people will do before going through with it.
QuoteAnd everyone in the world but me seemed to like the Dark Knight, so don't fret.
Finally! Someone else who agrees!
I guess you can call me a convert :P. I first loved the movie but after watching a movie that was soaked in prayer and I could see God working through it, I was convicted about how dark TDK was (plus a couple other movies I had). I ended up getting rid of them.
As for Inception, I was looking forward to it until I read about all the suicide parts (especially near the end). I lived with it for a long time so I don't like to watch movies that heavily involves it.
Did you happen to read the entire review or just what was posted? If you haven't read the whole thing, then you can't really judge it.Of course I only read what was posted because that was the point of the conversation at the time, and what was being argued. It was just part of the review that he posted, and I only commented on that part. So why would I go read a whole review when he posted only an excerpt, because that excerpt was the only part of the review that we were discussing. To sum it up, he posted a part of the review that had to do with what we were talking about, so why go read the rest of a review if it is not about what we are discussing?
Also, some people do go do something fun one last time before committing suicide.Ok you are comparing a Skillet concert to going and see a movie...
Did you actually see the movie?If you're asking me, then yes I saw it.
Too all who have seen Inception:
Is this true?
Do any characters (other than that one) commit suicide?
Does the movie actually encourage suicide?
Or does it show suicide as a horrible thing that ruins lives?
I've wrestled with severe depression and suicidal thoughts for years and I saw nothing that encourages suicide in the movie
where did you get the "nothing is real concept"?
I just saw Inception today. It was just as good as expected, probably the best movie since The Dark Knight. I thought that I would have trouble following, as I usually do with psychological movies, but I actually did just fine. I could pretty easily keep track of what was going on at all times. But this is a movie you can easliy watch twice and still extract a lot of depth from.
was it all a dream or was reality shown at all during the movie?The end leaves you guessing, but I'd like to say reality was shown.
When why did his kids look the same as he had remembered, many years prior >:c.was it all a dream or was reality shown at all during the movie?The end leaves you guessing, but I'd like to say reality was shown.
QuoteDid you happen to read the entire review or just what was posted? If you haven't read the whole thing, then you can't really judge it.Of course I only read what was posted because that was the point of the conversation at the time, and what was being argued. It was just part of the review that he posted, and I only commented on that part. So why would I go read a whole review when he posted only an excerpt, because that excerpt was the only part of the review that we were discussing. To sum it up, he posted a part of the review that had to do with what we were talking about, so why go read the rest of a review if it is not about what we are discussing?
That review is just trying to bash a film because they took it the wrong way.
The concept of a dream within a dream is an important one for Inception. Cobb and his cohorts construct dreams like nesting dolls to confuse their subjects. Wake up, you're still dreaming. Wake up again, and you may be dreaming still. Each dream-layer accesses a deeper level of subconscious.
A proper critique, then, demands the same treatment.
Layer 1: Artistically, Inception is one of the year's most provocative, compelling films. The story's the thing here—so strong that the film's topnotch cast and stunning visual effects serve it without overwhelming it. Directed by The Dark Knight's Christopher Nolan, Inception aspires to art without relinquishing its popcorn-munching bona fides. It's a film that'll likely resonate with critics and moviegoers alike.
So I can't help but wonder how someone who is already toying with the idea of ending it all would view this film—if they might look through the eyes of a "suicidal" character and find their own tragic longings mirrored there.
QuoteAlso, some people do go do something fun one last time before committing suicide.Ok you are comparing a Skillet concert to going and see a movie...
Anyone contemplating suicide would not say, "Hey it's a friday night, I'm gonna go see a movie."
Okay then....This is your review you posted. In no where did you say, hey go read the rest of this review. And then you asked questions based on this excerpt of the review, meaning (to me) that the rest of the review was insignificant to the discussion.
This is a direct quote from focus on the Family's review of Inception
Layer 2: Inception's content centers on its suicide-fueled violence—which trivializes the act of self-annihilation. In doing so, we're forced to a place where, looking through the eyes of some characters, suicide appears to be a convenient, beneficial out from a reality you don't want anymore: Let's scrap this world, because the real one—presumably a better one—lies beyond. In this ethos, suicide isn't an act of desperation or despair, but one of hope and promise. So I can't help but wonder how someone who is already toying with the idea of ending it all would view this film—if they might look through the eyes of a "suicidal" character and find their own tragic longings mirrored there.
I was trying to point out that some people, before going through with it, do one last fun thing. So it would be possible that they would go see a movie before they do it. I wasn't trying to compare a concert to a movie.Well we think very differently, because I think someone contemplating suicide does not go out to a movie before hand. But that's just me.
Regardless if the movie was meant to be a dream or not, watching two people putting there heads onto a train track while a train is coming is still something I chose not to watch.This is completely out of context. The train wreck was a kick to get her out of Limbo, not suicide.
I'm just getting tired of coming to these message boards (which most people claim to be Christians) bashing a Christian site that is meant to help other believers keep their mind clear of junk and for parents to know whats in a movie before they let their kids see it.I'm tired of people going to extremes and not letting things go. I think some review site, ANY NOT JUST CHRISTIAN, go too in depth sometimes when they find it offending and take parts of the movie out of context.
Please know that I am not trying to get people to not watch the movie. I'm just getting tired of coming to these message boards (which most people claim to be Christians) bashing a Christian site that is meant to help other believers keep their mind clear of junk and for parents to know whats in a movie before they let their kids see it.I tired of christian sites twisting fact to suit their needs
I think some review site, ANY NOT JUST CHRISTIAN, go too in depth sometimes when they find it offending and take parts of the movie out of context.I don't think it's going too in depth to warn parents that suicide is being portrayed in a movie. That is something that they deserve to know.
I tired of christian sites twisting fact to suit their needsI'm tired of Christian teens twisting the Christian worldview to suit their desires.
Please know that I am not trying to get people to not watch the movie. I'm just getting tired of coming to these message boards (which most people claim to be Christians) bashing a Christian site that is meant to help other believers keep their mind clear of junk and for parents to know whats in a movie before they let their kids see it.I tired of christian sites twisting fact to suit their needs
@ Rawr
You should find these interesting
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/fullcredits#cast (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1375666/fullcredits#cast) look at the stuff about the kids
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/08/inception_costume_designer_rev.html (http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/08/inception_costume_designer_rev.html)
@ Alex
so you're saying Cobb wanted to be separated from his wife and kids?
Ya know, I honestly forgot about the train stuff, jumping off the building thing, etc... But you wanna know why that is? Because it's a movie, I'm old enough to discern what is true and what is false, and I'm not a fan of the movie. The movie has an "R" rating, which means it's not for kiddies. Seriously, there's more to be concerned about in the Lion King (I like that movie) and other animated cartoons that are rated PG and are geared for children. Everyone has their own convictions about what God wants them to/not do, and it's up to each one of us to listen and follow our convictions (With caution). If you are young in the faith and haven't spiritually matured, you should be very cautious about what you view.
Oh my goodness, I got WAY serious up there :O
There was an AND OTHER ANIMATED MOVIES added to that. Children are more impressionable and thus, are susceptible to influence.
There was an AND OTHER ANIMATED MOVIES added to that. Children are more impressionable and thus, are susceptible to influence.
Children are susceptible to more things, but if they don't understand the subtle message, than they can't be impressioned by it.
There was an AND OTHER ANIMATED MOVIES added to that. Children are more impressionable and thus, are susceptible to influence.
Children are susceptible to more things, but if they don't understand the subtle message, than they can't be impressioned by it.
They don't understand suicide or what bad words mean/why they're bad, so what's ya point? (I'm really not trying to start a debate.)
I'm tired of Christian adults deciding that their interpretation of Christianity forms the exact worldview that said Christian teens should be following.Do I expect all Christian teenagers to agree with my worldview on everything? No. Am I going to sit there and let a Christian teenager insult other Christians who are reviewing all these movies as a service (and perhaps even a ministry) to Christian parents out there? No.
Really? could have fooled me.I'm tired of Christian adults deciding that their interpretation of Christianity forms the exact worldview that said Christian teens should be following.Do I expect all Christian teenagers to agree with my worldview on everything? No.
Really? could have fooled me.I understand why you may have that perspective. But just because I believe my worldview, and try to communicate it doesn't mean that I expect everyone to agree. Of course I do kinda hope for that to happen, but I recognize that I have many Christian brothers and sisters who see things differently :)
JSB (who you directly quoted) didn't insult themActually I think that accusing the Christians (who are volunteering to review movies to aid other Christians to make wise viewing choices) of twisting things for selfish reasons is insulting.
what about the argument you and I and YMT had a little while ago?Really? could have fooled me.I understand why you may have that perspective. But just because I believe my worldview, and try to communicate it doesn't mean that I expect everyone to agree. Of course I do kinda hope for that to happen, but I recognize that I have many Christian brothers and sisters who see things differently :)
There was an AND OTHER ANIMATED MOVIES added to that. Children are more impressionable and thus, are susceptible to influence.
Children are susceptible to more things, but if they don't understand the subtle message, than they can't be impressioned by it.
They don't understand suicide or what bad words mean/why they're bad, so what's ya point? (I'm really not trying to start a debate.)
But they do understand violence. In primitive terms, it is concievable that a 7 year old would come out of Inception saying "maybe if I hurt myself, I will get somewhere else!". The same child will never come out of Lion King and say " I should go worship animals!" or "I should save the rainforests!" or "This tree has the same life energy as I do!".
I would love to participate in this discussion, but you guys talk too much. :P
When why did his kids look the same as he had remembered, many years prior >:c.
Same clothes and everything >:c.
>:c
As far as whether it is appropriate for christians or not, I think it is a bit ridiculous to say that a movie has questionable elements to it. Any intelligent and critical thinking person can easily deduce that the overall movie is fine. I think it is a bit shameful for organizations like focus on the family to get caught up in that and become harbingers of fear than to correctly interpret the movie.This is how comments like this sound to me. How dare a Christian organization try to even warn other Christians ahead of time so that they can make an informed choice as to whether they want to watch a certain movie? We should just detest organizations like this and just go watch whatever movies Hollywood puts out. After all, why be any different from the World, right?
So we should exercise discernment about the movies we watch, but we should not exercise discernment about the reviews we read?Exercise discernment, sure. But "detesting" Focus on the Family....really? That organization may be more conservative than some Christians identify with. Or they may be more outspoken or political than some Christians are comfortable with. But "shameful"....really?
So we should exercise discernment about the movies we watch, but we should not exercise discernment about the reviews we read?Exercise discernment, sure. But "detesting" Focus on the Family....really? That organization may be more conservative than some Christians identify with. Or they may be more outspoken or political than some Christians are comfortable with. But "shameful"....really?
Shameful that Focus on the family would set aside their biblical call to preach christ crucified and spend an excessive amount of their time and resources pushing a conservative political even when it conflicts with the gospel.This right here is HUGE. So often these days, we can become anti-democrats instead of Christians.
I have had my fill of Focus on the Family. You can have your own opinions but if you want to impress your views upon me, I will warn you that while I dont discount all of what Dobson says, I dont listen to much of it.I'm not forcing my views on you any more than you are on me. We're both simply stating our perspectives for the other person to read and do with what they will.
This right here is HUGE. So often these days, we can become anti-democrats instead of Christians.And so often these days, liberals can become anti-Christians instead of anti-conservatives. Debate the conservative/liberal issue, don't attack Christian organizations who are trying to do what they believe God is calling them too (unless they are promoting something anti-Biblical).
That doesn't avoid the issue that Christian media is just out to get the liberals at times.This right here is HUGE. So often these days, we can become anti-democrats instead of Christians.And so often these days, liberals can become anti-Christians instead of anti-conservatives. Debate the conservative/liberal issue, don't attack Christian organizations who are trying to do what they believe God is calling them too (unless they are promoting something anti-Biblical).
I don't know why you're defending Focus on the Family because they say parents should "coach" their teenagers and we all know that leads to teenage rebellionSo we should exercise discernment about the movies we watch, but we should not exercise discernment about the reviews we read?Exercise discernment, sure. But "detesting" Focus on the Family....really? That organization may be more conservative than some Christians identify with. Or they may be more outspoken or political than some Christians are comfortable with. But "shameful"....really?
I don't know why you're defending Focus on the Family because they say parents should "coach" their teenagers and we all know that leads to teenage rebellion
I don't know why you're defending Focus on the Family because they say parents should "coach" their teenagers and we all know that leads to teenage rebellion
You'll need to cite some references for such a claim, otherwise you just sound like a rebellious teenager. ;)
a conservative political even when it conflicts with the gospel.Proof or it didn't happen. No tenant of conservative theory contradicts the Bible.
I'm not forcing my views on you any more than you are on me. We're both simply stating our perspectives for the other person to read and do with what they will.
Yes, but the thrust of your perspective seems to be that having a strong opinion against an organization of people is equivalent to rebellion against God.I never said anyone was rebelling against God. However, I do not appreciate the liberal attacks on Christian organizations in the last decade or so. I am offended by people who no longer even want to identify themselves as "Christians".
In the 90's there was a movement that tried to identify Christianity with being Republican. It focused primarily on being pro-life, anti-homosexuality, and pro-politics in general. Now in the 2000's there is a movement that tries to identify Christianity with liberalism. It focuses primarily on environmentalism, eliminating poverty, and avoiding politics in general.
Quotea conservative political even when it conflicts with the gospel.Proof or it didn't happen. No tenant of conservative theory contradicts the Bible.
I just happen not to think that anyone who has a problem with Focus on the Family - or even more narrowly, their form of film criticism - is by default a). ideologically liberal, b). intent upon watching anything produced by Hollywood with no discernment, or c). intent upon exhibiting purely secular behavior.
Having professed each of these three opinions at one point or another, I stand by my observation about what your statements seem to be saying.
FWIW, you can still vote on local issues without having to submit yourself to Sophie's Choice. In fact, my dyed-in-the-wool-10th-Amendment-states-rights-conservatism depends on your involvement on a local level. ;)
If you mind is always open, wouldn't your brain fall out :P
There are some things that being "closed minded" about is a good thing. Everýone should have somethungs that they are set about else they will be fikkle and just go with whoever sounds better.
a). you can vote on issues and not politicians. e.g. there is a library levy on our local ballot this year of some import.
I also mainly focus on the props (especially since I'm a conservative in Cali, my votes are mostly meaningless (except next week where we might finally win back Cali)). I see the props as the best way to have our voices heard (well...unless the losers whine and drag it out in court forever).And what would you be winning California back from?
Governor/senate/house.:doh: Forgot to look at the date
Fact: The people of CA, overwhelmingly democrat, voted for Prop 8.Governor/senate/house.First off there is next to no chance of republicans gaining control of California
Secondly if they did that would be bad because republicans don't really understand "Liberty and justice for all" means all people, not just heterosexuals
Fact: Prop 8 had nothing to do with liberty or justice.Yes it does,
Fact: The zero-gravity fight was epic.
I know I'm hoping for a Republican victory and they take the majority. And when it happens, I hope my boi BHO doesn't want to negotiate the budget, so one isn't passed. That'd be epicly interesting.
Your logic confuses me, the only way to limit spending is not to limit it hmm....I know I'm hoping for a Republican victory and they take the majority. And when it happens, I hope my boi BHO doesn't want to negotiate the budget, so one isn't passed. That'd be epicly interesting.
That would be nice. I think the only way for the government to not overspend is to get them to not pass a budget to begin with.
Personally I believe a balanced budget amendment should be passed with a war time only emergency exception.
Your logic confuses me, the only way to limit spending is not to limit it hmm....
If you're mad at me about the science thread get mad at me over there. Your holier-then-thou-tirades aren't wanted here.Your logic confuses me, the only way to limit spending is not to limit it hmm....
His logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.
First of all, economic emergencies don't count.The Great Depression?
IMO there is no "too big to fail" and if there is the the government let it happen on their watch and they all deserve to reap the benefits of the angry voters that come to Washington with pitchforks and torches.See previous
Second, I would not consider Iraq or Afghanistan an Emergency.It may not be an emergency but we are at war
If you're mad at me about the science thread get mad at me over there. Your holier-then-thou-tirades aren't wanted here.
???If you're mad at me about the science thread get mad at me over there. Your holier-then-thou-tirades aren't wanted here.
That you're treating Matt (and Ironica) with so little consideration is a fact that has nothing to do with me or with other threads.
This isn't about anybody being holier than anybody. This is about stopping with the snide comments long enough to actually listen to what other people are saying.If I make snide comments about someone's post I would have needed to read the post first
If you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.
Other then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an example
If I make snide comments about someone's post I would have needed to read the post first
I would like to remind you this is the internet, I can express myself in anyway I choose.
If you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.
So basically, I was correct to say you should not treat people that way.QuoteUhhh.. no, I deleted the post because it was just plain wrong, if it had been accurate I would have kept itQuoteOther then that I have treated have treated Matt fine. if you feel I have been treating them badly please give me an example
The specific sentence I quoted was your sarcastic response to him that misinterprets what he said. So either you were being sarcastic because you wanted to belittle his intelligence, or you were deliberately misinterpreting him to make him sound unintelligent. So far I have given you benefit of the doubt that you were not doing this deliberately, and suggested that working to achieve an understanding instead of crossing people about a misunderstanding has a positive outcome for everybody.QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me. As I said before if he was offended he would have said something
and this was your idea of meeting half way?QuoteHis logic does not confuse you, apparently his statement does. If you spent half as much time working towards an understanding as you did crafting sarcastic responses, you'd probably get a lot more out of these discussions, and so would your brethren.Quoteviolates those policies or turns into a disruptive force on the boards
I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
If you're talking about that I deleted the post because it was wrong and in poor taste.I deleted the post because it was just plain wrong, if it had been accurate I would have kept it
You're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me.
and this was your idea of meeting half way?
I would like to see this policy I'm "violating"
I'm surprised you can tell what I meant better then I can, you must be psychic or something.QuoteYou're making an assumption, I was asking a legitimate question, his thought process confused me.Based on a misinterpretation. And your tone did not reflect a mere question.
You're not really making your other posts look any better by attacking me also. It just proves my point.Your point that you're psychic?
If you think that was my point, can you demonstrate where I made that claim?I just want you to explain to me how you "know" my post was an attack on Crustpope when I've said it wasn't and he didn't think so either
Exactly how long do you intend to keep seeing how far you can push me?
I've already explained everything I intend to explain. I'm not interested in playing mind games with you. And your response to me in the form of sarcasm and snide comments tells me you're not interested in playing this straight. So we're at an impasse.Let's see what you've explained:
I'm just curious how you knew my post was an attack when it clearly wasn't
I can't prove you're wrong so if it makes you happy to think you're right go right ahead I can't stop youI'm just curious how you knew my post was an attack when it clearly wasn't
I'm curious how "clearly" you can make this claim when it is so easily interpreted sarcastically and you have exhibited a pattern of sarcasm and condescension in this thread and others in recent days and weeks. In light of that, how "clear" is this really?
I can't prove you're wrong so if it makes you happy to think you're right go right ahead I can't stop you
Tonight I realized that Inception totally ripped off of The Princess Bride.
YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE PRINCESS BRIDE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! WATCH IT. NOW.Tonight I realized that Inception totally ripped off of The Princess Bride.
How so? (I've never seen The Princess Bride, so don't laugh too hard if I'm missing something).
-C_S
And HEY HOW ABOUT THAT MOVIE THAT WAS IN A THEATER...
Roger that, maybe I will sometime.YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE PRINCESS BRIDE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! WATCH IT. NOW.Tonight I realized that Inception totally ripped off of The Princess Bride.
How so? (I've never seen The Princess Bride, so don't laugh too hard if I'm missing something).
-C_S
Inception=Mawiage.