Author Topic: Forum Purge? (Read 10364 times)

Prof Underwood · « **on:** January 02, 2009, 04:57:46 PM »

Has there been a huge purge of the forum?

I was looking for the thread on TEAMS play and noticed it was gone. Then I noticed that a WHOLE LOT of thread are gone. Is anyone else seeing this?

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #1 on:** January 02, 2009, 05:26:37 PM »

Yes. It happened sometime within the last week.

Clarinetguy097 · « **Reply #2 on:** January 02, 2009, 05:53:34 PM »

Yeah, like 90 pages of the off-topic were deleted.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #3 on:** January 02, 2009, 06:40:32 PM »

I was wondering why I had only started 20 some topics... and why redemption99's 101 topic starts were all gone

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #4 on:** January 02, 2009, 06:43:25 PM »

*sighs* I had a feeling. That is depressing, just cuz a thread is older doesn't make it useless.

Captain Kirk · « **Reply #5 on:** January 02, 2009, 06:58:46 PM »

I think most of the threads are fine to go, EXCEPT for the Ruling Question threads. I reference those frequently during online games if there is a question and I knew the answer was posted online for easy referencing. However, I discovered this past week I could not do that as there are only the most 12 recent pages in Ruling Questions... $:-\$

Kirk

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #6 on:** January 02, 2009, 07:31:01 PM »

maybe thats why 2 days ago i went from heroe to sr....

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #7 on:** January 02, 2009, 07:43:15 PM »

Quote from: Captain Kirk on January 02, 2009, 06:58:46 PM

I think most of the threads are fine to go, EXCEPT for the Ruling Question threads. I reference those frequently during online games if there is a question and I knew the answer was posted online for easy referencing. However, I discovered this past week I could not do that as there are only the most 12 recent pages in Ruling Questions... $:-\$

Kirk

Agreed, but the teams thread is gone too, along with other game types. And I hate seeing old decks go away. I use them frequently to see ideas in them and modify my old ones (bumping them after, but I have to edit them first) and other such nonsense. I don't mind the others much but decks/Rulings being deleted is bad

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #8 on:** January 02, 2009, 07:45:28 PM »

I agree with Kirk also. There have been several recent Rulings Questions threads that have rehashed old debate threads that finally came to a resolution. To have those resolutions thrown out is setting us up for more debates. There should at least be a sticky thread that takes final rulings and posts them for permanent recall.

Many of the RoA questions were asked long before the majority of the community even started building up their RoA collection. The questions are coming now, but the answers were figured out in threads that date back to Natz.

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #9 on:** January 02, 2009, 08:24:26 PM »

I'm with Red'Rocks in that I really enjoy going back and mining ideas from old decks.

MichaelHue's posts on DiamondWall? Gone, gone, gone.

Heroless of the North? Buh, bye.

Sean · « **Reply #10 on:** January 02, 2009, 08:45:46 PM »

What we really need is some sort of archive so that the old threads are out of the way but still able to be searched for and viewed.

Sean

michael/michaelssword · « **Reply #11 on:** January 02, 2009, 08:46:41 PM »

Quote from: Sean on January 02, 2009, 08:45:46 PM

What we really need is some sort of archive so that the old threads are out of the way but still able to be searched for and viewed.

Sean

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #12 on:** January 02, 2009, 11:44:48 PM »

A Redemption Forum Junkyard!

Cameron the Conqueror · « **Reply #13 on:** January 03, 2009, 12:55:38 AM »

Quote from: xCaLeBx on January 02, 2009, 08:46:41 PM

Quote from: Sean on January 02, 2009, 08:45:46 PM
What we really need is some sort of archive so that the old threads are out of the way but still able to be searched for and viewed.

Sean

LadyNobody · « **Reply #14 on:** January 04, 2009, 12:38:39 AM »

Matt, the Heroless of the North was broken by FooF, and probably even more so by RoA, though I have yet to get a good look at the new cards. I haven't had time for Redemption since...State, sadly. But I actually asked my bro today about heroless and he said it was broken. Which is too bad, seeing as how I was thinking it'd be fun for the Princess to randomly show up to a tournament with a heroless and having everyone be shocked that I was converted to the 'dark side'

~Britta

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #15 on:** January 04, 2009, 09:20:03 AM »

Broken? Maybe he hasn't had enough time to fully fix it eh?

The Schaef · « **Reply #16 on:** January 04, 2009, 11:21:23 PM »

I'm a little disappointed in this, myself. I was told a purge was coming, but I hoped the rulings thread would stay put.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #17 on:** January 04, 2009, 11:25:32 PM »

I'm surprised there wasn't a thread 'OMGOSH SCHAEF YOU DELETED ALL THE OLD THREADS!'

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #18 on:** January 04, 2009, 11:30:23 PM »

He did delete the old threads. This is all part of a Mod cover-up.

The Schaef · « **Reply #19 on:** January 04, 2009, 11:31:48 PM »

When the [Administrator] does it, it's not illegal.

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #20 on:** January 05, 2009, 12:23:18 AM »

I've seen Clear and Present Danger, so I'm not falling for that one. Don't make me call in Jack Ryan (with Alec Baldwin reprising the role).

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #21 on:** January 05, 2009, 12:45:23 AM »

I just want to state that I am upset by this. I will be contacting people regarding this issue in hopes of resolution.

Tsavong Lah · « **Reply #22 on:** January 05, 2009, 01:17:14 AM »

Quote

When the [Administrator] does it, it's not illegal.

mmm, still need to see that movie. How was it (assuming you saw it)?

The Guardian · « **Reply #23 on:** January 05, 2009, 04:56:49 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on January 05, 2009, 12:23:18 AM

I've seen Clear and Present Danger, so I'm not falling for that one. Don't make me call in Jack Ryan (with Alec Baldwin reprising the role).

Forget Jack Ryan...today's "I'll take on anyone even the President of the USA" hero is clearly Jack Bauer...

The Schaef · « **Reply #24 on:** January 05, 2009, 06:17:44 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on January 05, 2009, 12:23:18 AM

I've seen Clear and Present Danger, so I'm not falling for that one. Don't make me call in Jack Ryan (with Alec Baldwin reprising the role).

What you apparently have not seen are the 30-second TV spots or full-length trailers for Frost/Nixon. :p

JSB23 · « **Reply #25 on:** January 05, 2009, 08:18:05 AM »

Quote from: YourMathTeacher on January 04, 2009, 11:30:23 PM

He did delete the old threads. This is all part of a Mod cover-up.

Quote from: The Schaef on January 04, 2009, 11:31:48 PM

When the [Administrator] does it, it's not illegal.

It's not the original crime; it's the coverup.

Schaef, there's a Mr. Woodward and a Mr. Bernstein on line 1.

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #26 on:** January 05, 2009, 03:47:19 PM »

Quote from: The Guardian on January 05, 2009, 04:56:49 AM

Forget Jack Ryan...today's "I'll take on anyone even the President of the USA" hero is clearly Jack Bauer...

What is it with Jacks anyway?

Besides, noone is more intimidating than Alec Baldwin as Jack Ryan. He only gave up the role to Harrison Ford when he was offered the more lucrative role as the narrator in Thomas the Tank Engine.

However, now that Harrison Ford is busy filming Indiana Jones and the Chamber of Secrets, Baldwin can step back into his supreme role.

The Schaef · « **Reply #27 on:** January 05, 2009, 03:49:34 PM »

Ford Ryan > Baldwin Ryan. Any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

YourMathTeacher · « **Reply #28 on:** January 05, 2009, 03:56:26 PM »

Indeed, but Harrison Ford would have made a lousy Sir Toppam Hat.

News:

Author Topic: Forum Purge? (Read 10364 times)

Clarinetguy097

Warrior_Monk

michael/michaelssword

michael/michaelssword

The Schaef

The Schaef

The Schaef

The Schaef