Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: browarod on September 24, 2011, 06:40:09 PM
-
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi55.tinypic.com%2Foi91qd.gif&hash=9bb2a50f4b38dde486efdf6044004ecbb240245a)
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi51.tinypic.com%2F2metlhg.gif&hash=a1fb45452d11882abb2cfd612ae0ab43c940db4f)
-
I like. I like very much. Are these going to be submitted to the player made expansion?
-
I like. I like very much. Are these going to be submitted to the player made expansion?
I was considering it. Do you think they're useful enough?
-
I like. I like very much. Are these going to be submitted to the player made expansion?
I was considering it. Do you think they're useful enough?
I think that Halah is more useful - Assyrians TGT defense - but all multi-soul per site cards are useful.
-
I like them too, but I still don't like Assyrians :(
Haha, fair enough. I think I would like Halah for my current Assyrian deck, and I might consider switching to more capture if Assyria had this ability.
-
I like both of them, but I would Human Character, it doesn't make sense if an Angel can be put there.
-
I don't know that Assyrians can capture many angels, plus a captured angel could still be put in it anyway (since it can hold a Lost Soul normally besides the captured characters) so I'm inclined to just leave it. Thanks for the suggestion, though. Glad you like them. ^_^
-
No Prob!
-
I would change Assyria, as right now it doesn't seem particularly useful, and in fact, could be harmful (Assyrian Survivor is a big example of this). Make it a dual-colored site (Purple/Green), and give it the ability to hold as many souls as you have Assyrians in play (make sure the ability is a hold ability, not a place ability - if an Assyrian gets discarded, and you've reached the max amount of souls, one of those souls has to be taken out (holder's choice).
I'm mixed on Halah. I just can't see myself using it in my deck. Not being ignored is nice, but right now, TGT isn't being used at all really, and Zeb is easily taken care of. Being able to stomp Israelite Kings is nice, but again, can be taken care of if you plan for it a little bit. Basically, it addresses two specific strategies and nothing else. "Protect your Assyrians from being brought into battle by an opponent" would make this + Assyrian Camp all-encompassing protection, and would make it a staple in Assyrian decks. Just my opinion.
-
Assyria currently would be treated like Babylonian Banquet Hall: if one of the targets (Assyrian or Babylonian Site respectively) is removed from the field it doesn't kick anything out of the site, it just means nothing additional can be put into the site if it is at or above the maximum. Also, I think some of the Assyrian kings + Assyria's x/x gain + Covenant with Death would make an interesting battle.
Genesis has more ignore than just Zeb; though the CBIg was mostly added to give it a little something more so I don't have my heart set on it or anything, lol.
Thanks for the comments, I'll mull them over. ^_^