Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 01:57:03 PM

Title: New Sites
Post by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 01:57:03 PM: what would you think if Cactus made Rivers into sites and name the cities on that river so heroes could use it for access to multiple sites? What about mountain ranges & deserts, etc?
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: megamanlan on May 12, 2011, 02:20:27 PM: If u want to then just find some ideas and make them into card ideas and post them here. That's what this forum is for.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: SomeKittens on May 12, 2011, 03:05:28 PM: I'm fairly sure delarosajon knows what this place is for.

How exactly would the "multiple site access" work? Could I access the cities that were along those rivers?
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: browarod on May 12, 2011, 06:02:10 PM: I assume he means something like this:

The Nile
Hero gains access to Egypt, Pharaoh's Prison, Banks of the Nile, and Pharaoh's Court sites this battle.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 06:05:06 PM: Correct and of course in addition to just site access, they can have special abilities as well.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: SomeKittens on May 12, 2011, 07:23:44 PM: While it's an interesting concept, I don't think they'll see much play.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Minister Polarius on May 12, 2011, 08:50:38 PM: Euphrates
Blue Site
"Any ability used by a Babylonian that targets Humans may also target Angels. If in battle, Heroes have access to all Babylonian Sites."

Perhaps something like that?
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 09:00:39 PM: Not exactly what I had in mind, but it could work.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Ironica on May 12, 2011, 09:01:27 PM: I would love that site (especially since some one in my play group is making a T2 deck full of angels).
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Minister Polarius on May 12, 2011, 09:04:22 PM: Humn, from the OP I'd have thought that's exactly what you meant. What did I misinterpret?
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 09:31:51 PM: Quote from: Minister Polarius on May 12, 2011, 09:04:22 PM
Humn, from the OP I'd have thought that's exactly what you meant. What did I misinterpret?

When you said Euphrates with the ability to give access to all Babylonian sites. Let's say if a Nineveh site were to be created, the ability mention shouldn't work because technically it's located on the Tigris river. Then again you could get there by boat I'd imagine, since they intercept. Bad example.

It shouldnt work if say a Babylonian site is created for a city that's not on or near that river.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Minister Polarius on May 12, 2011, 09:48:56 PM: I see what you're saying, but the "river civilizations" are Babylon and Egypt. The SA's would be way, way too long if you tried to list every individual city that's mentioned in the Bible along the given river. For the Nile and the Euphrates, it'd be accurate enough to just say "Egyptian" and "Babylonian" imo.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: Deck Metrics on May 12, 2011, 10:23:05 PM: I meant for sites or cities that have actually been created, but you're still right. This is all just ideas up for discussion.
Title: Re: New Sites
Post by: megamanlan on May 13, 2011, 01:29:12 AM: Yea, for the Nile it would be just Egyptian Sites. Besides Nineveh was in Assyrian City. Only the Tigris would give access to it.