Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => New Card Ideas => Topic started by: megamanlan on October 26, 2011, 11:08:54 PM
-
I had this idea, I want to see what all of u think on it.
Ascending Angel
5/5 Silver Hero
Rev. 7:2, Angel, Generic
Remove a Covenant in Deck or Discard Pile for this Card to gain that effect. If the Card has 'I Am' in the title, this card keeps that effect while in play. May Band to a Classless Revelation Angel.
-
"Classless" doesn't exist in Redemption, I think you mean "non-warrior-class". You certainly do like your banding, lol.
So, if I remove an "I Am" covenant and another covenant (or 2 "I Am"s), does he then have both abilities? I think it would be OP (and confusing) if he kept any abilities past each battle.
-
Once u reactivate his effect he loses the last one. The I am's were made to be somewhat of an exception. So u could remove I Am Mercy (I think...) to Protect ur Hand/Deck from Discard while he's in play. Also most I Am's would be useless to use on him. But no, he keeps the last I Am's effect that was Removed. And a covenant that is removed in battle until the end of the battle. Only the last Removed I Am card's effect stays in play. Just not sure how to put that on the card.
Also. I've been trying to make a better and smaller name for 'Non-Warrior Class' called Classless. Just to shorten the cards. Also it technically means not Territory Class when mentioned on Enhancements too. So I dont have to write 'A non-Weapon or Territory Class Enhancement' (some of my cards have that)
-
I think it'd work better if you could just activate them on him.
-
No, that would be too easy plus it doesnt have a cost then.
-
Just RFG afterward, unless it's an "I am"
-
As much as I hate megamanlan's silver Revelation craze, I actually really like this card. I really don't see what's so OP about him gaining abilities of all of the "I Am"s (especially since I am Justice would have him discarded after two battles), and it's not like people wouldn't just stick the "I Am"s on him anyway, but this way they cannot be DoN'd so easily. I really like the idea of gaining an ability instead of just activating stuff on it, or banding, or "if ___ is in battle". Noah represent!
I could care less about the Classless. Personally, I think one day we will have territory class characters, and it's a good term to start using. I like how all of the non-red (and illegal) custom heroes would become classless. Red is classy.
Drop the banding.
-
(https://www.cactusforums.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm7.static.flickr.com%2F6056%2F6286274753_e246c1bcfc_z.jpg&hash=e2127f926a215c3532ee2b49045a29e1c5c86e1d)
I edited the wording a bit and removed 'Generic' (I don't think he's generic).
-
Added to the gallery: http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/new-card-ideas/player-made-cards/ (http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/new-card-ideas/player-made-cards/)
-
Okay. I do like the idea of instead of saying Non-Warrior Class to Classless so we can shorten the cards.
I'm okay w/ dropping the Banding, but just to note, nearly any Revelation Set would have Angels as the main theme. As for my love of Revelation Angels is because Revelation is my favorite book so I want to make Card Ideas on it. And nearly all Revelation Ideas will be Angels & Martyrs & John-based on the good side, the Evil side will definitely Demon bonus
-
I think a John Herolite theme would be neat. Get a good reprint of him, with some Rev. angels and support cards. Maybe like the new Isaiah things.
-
I do that plus make a Revelation Angel stand-alone, Revelation Angels/Martyrs, Classless Revelation Angels and WC Revelation Angel sets.
-
Very cool card. I am Justice would be a cool use of this card.
-
Thx!
Also Minster Polarius, aren't u supposed to give me credit for the card idea on Player-Made Cards section?
-
No, credit is given to whoever makes the physical card.
the player made cards section is just based on look, not content
-
No, credit is given to whoever makes the physical card.
the player made cards section is just based on look, not content
Rockyaacdtm got credit for David, which was not made by him.
-
That's correct. Many of the cards on there were made by me, but you'll notice I'm not credited on there. The credit goes to whoever made the card image, not who had the idea for the card.
-
Okay, thx for clarifying.